Towards quantitative imaging: stability of fully automated nodule segmentation across varied dose levels and reconstruction parameters in a low-dose CT screening patient cohort

Quantitative imaging in lung cancer CT seeks to characterize nodules through quantitative features, usually from a region of interest delineating the nodule. The segmentation, however, can vary depending on segmentation approach and image quality, which can affect the extracted feature values. In this study, we utilize a fully-automated nodule segmentation method – to avoid reader-influenced inconsistencies – to explore the effects of varied dose levels and reconstruction parameters on segmentation. Raw projection CT images from a low-dose screening patient cohort (N=59) were reconstructed at multiple dose levels (100%, 50%, 25%, 10%), two slice thicknesses (1.0mm, 0.6mm), and a medium kernel. Fully-automated nodule detection and segmentation was then applied, from which 12 nodules were selected. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to assess the similarity of the segmentation ROIs of the same nodule across different reconstruction and dose conditions. Nodules at 1.0mm slice thickness and dose levels of 25% and 50% resulted in DSC values greater than 0.85 when compared to 100% dose, with lower dose leading to a lower average and wider spread of DSC values. At 0.6mm, the increased bias and wider spread of DSC values from lowering dose were more pronounced. The effects of dose reduction on DSC for CAD-segmented nodules were similar in magnitude to reducing the slice thickness from 1.0mm to 0.6mm. In conclusion, variation of dose and slice thickness can result in very different segmentations because of noise and image quality. However, there exists some stability in segmentation overlap, as even at 1mm, an image with 25% of the lowdose scan still results in segmentations similar to that seen in a full-dose scan.

[1]  L. Tanoue,et al.  Variability of Lung Tumor Measurements on Repeat Computed Tomography Scans Taken Within 15 Minutes , 2012 .

[2]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Influence of lung nodule margin on volume- and diameter-based reader variability in CT lung cancer screening. , 2018, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  M. F. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Variability in CT lung-nodule quantification: Effects of dose reduction and reconstruction methods on density and texture based features , 2016, Medical physics.

[4]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Evaluating variability in tumor measurements from same-day repeat CT scans of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. , 2009, Radiology.

[5]  Sam Peterson,et al.  Algorithm Variability in the Estimation of Lung Nodule Volume From Phantom CT Scans: Results of the QIBA 3A Public Challenge. , 2016, Academic radiology.

[6]  Eran A Barnoy,et al.  Toward clinically usable CAD for lung cancer screening with computed tomography , 2014, European Radiology.

[7]  Lawrence H. Schwartz,et al.  Assessing the effect of CT slice interval on unidimensional, bidimensional and volumetric measurements of solid tumours , 2012, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[8]  Qiu Wang,et al.  A low dose simulation tool for CT systems with energy integrating detectors. , 2013, Medical physics.

[9]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2018 , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  Michael F. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Determining the Variability of Lesion Size Measurements from CT Patient Data Sets Acquired under “No Change” Conditions12 , 2015, Translational oncology.

[11]  M. Roizen Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening , 2012 .

[12]  L. Tanoue,et al.  Lung cancer screening. , 2015, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[13]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  Test–Retest Reproducibility Analysis of Lung CT Image Features , 2014, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[14]  M. Martel,et al.  High quality machine-robust image features: identification in nonsmall cell lung cancer computed tomography images. , 2013, Medical physics.

[15]  M. Melamed,et al.  The effect of surgical treatment on survival from early lung cancer. Implications for screening. , 1992, Chest.

[16]  M. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Variability in CT lung-nodule volumetry: Effects of dose reduction and reconstruction methods. , 2015, Medical physics.

[17]  John Hoffman,et al.  Technical Note: FreeCT_wFBP: A robust, efficient, open-source implementation of weighted filtered backprojection for helical, fan-beam CT. , 2016, Medical physics.