An anatomy of a YouTube meme

Launched in 2005 as a video-sharing website, YouTube has become an emblem of participatory culture. A central feature of this website is the dazzling number of derivative videos, uploaded daily by many thousands. Using the ‘meme’ concept as an analytic tool, this article aims at uncovering the attributes common to ‘memetic videos’ – popular clips that generate extensive user engagement by way of creative derivatives. Drawing on YouTube popularity-measurements and on user-generated playlists, a corpus of 30 prominent memetic videos was assembled. A combined qualitative and quantitative analysis of these videos yielded six common features: focus on ordinary people, flawed masculinity, humor, simplicity, repetitiveness and whimsical content. Each of these attributes marks the video as incomplete or flawed, thereby invoking further creative dialogue. In its concluding section, the article addresses the skyrocketing popularity of mimicking in contemporary digital culture, linking it to economic, social and cultural logics of participation.

[1]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[2]  Edward Carpenter,et al.  The Art Of Creation , 1907 .

[3]  Brenton J. Malin.  American masculinity under Clinton : popular media and the "crisis of masculinity" , 2001 .

[4]  Richard A. Lanham,et al.  The `Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information , 2006 .

[5]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[6]  Henry Jenkins.  Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture , 1992 .

[7]  H. Plotkin.  Learning, development, and culture: Essays in evolutionary epistemology , 1982 .

[8]  Joshua Green,et al.  YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture , 2009 .

[9]  D. Dennett,et al.  Darwinizing culture : the status of memetics as a science , 2001 .

[10]  Colin Lankshear,et al.  Online memes, affinities, and cultural production , 2007 .

[11]  Elizabeth Fish Hatfield.  “What it Means to Be a Man”: Examining Hegemonic Masculinity in Two and a Half Men , 2010 .

[12]  R. Lewontin.  ‘The Selfish Gene’ , 1977, Nature.

[13]  F. Jameson,et al.  Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism , 1992 .

[14]  Victor Raskin,et al.  Semantic mechanisms of humor , 1984 .

[15]  Thomas R. Lindlof.  Qualitative Communication Research Methods , 1994 .

[16]  D. Bassett.  Brenton J. Malin: American Masculinity under Clinton. Popular Media and the Nineties "Crisis of Masculinity" , 2006 .

[17]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy , 2008 .

[18]  Richard Collins,et al.  Rawls, Fraser, redistribution, recognition and The World Summit on the Information Society , 2007 .

[19]  Gregg J. Rickman.  : Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture . Henry Jenkins. , 1993 .

[20]  D. Hendrick,et al.  Introduction , 1998, Thorax.

[21]  G. Kuipers.  Media culture and Internet disaster jokes , 2002 .

[22]  José van Dijck,et al.  Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content , 2009 .

[23]  J. Burgess.  'All your chocolate rain are belong to us'?: Viral video, YouTube and the dynamics of participatory culture , 2008 .

[24]  Henry Jenkins.  Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[25]  C. Heath,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Emotional Selection in Memes: the Case of Urban Legends , 2022 .

[26]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Jan Fernback,et al.  Legends on the net: an examination of computer-mediated communication as a locus of oral culture , 2003, New Media Soc..

[28]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[29]  RESEARCHING HUMOR ON THE INTERNET , 2003 .

[30]  Michael Pickering,et al.  Beyond a joke : the limits of humour , 2005 .

[31]  R. Pech.  Memes and cognitive hardwiring: why are some memes more successful than others? , 2003 .

[32]  N. Baym,et al.  Amateur experts , 2009 .

[33]  Eduardo Di Petta.  Henry Jenkins (2006), Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century, Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation , 2012 .

[34]  R. Hanke.  The “mock‐macho” situation comedy: Hegemonic masculinity and its reiteration , 1998 .

[35]  J. Huizinga.  Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture , 1938 .

[36]  J. Morreall.  Humour and the Conduct of Politics , 2005 .

[37]  L. Shifman,et al.  Humor in the Age of Digital Reproduction : Continuity and Change in Internet-Based Comic Texts , 2007 .

[38]  Alexandra Juhasz.  Learning the Five Lessons of YouTube: After Trying to Teach There, I Don't Believe the Hype , 2008 .

[39]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  Social Transmission, Emotion, and the Virality of Online Content , 2010 .

[40]  Michael Billig,et al.  Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour , 2005 .

[41]  Richard Shusterman,et al.  Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism , 1992 .

[42]  U. Beck,et al.  Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences , 2001 .

[43]  金本 節子.  "Cultural Studies"としてみた「日本事情」 , 1994 .