A new dawn for the naming of fungi: impacts of decisions made in Melbourne in July 2011 on the future publication and regulation of fungal names

A personal synopsis of the decisions made at the Nomenclature Section meeting of the International Botanical Congress in Melbourne in July 2011 is provided, with an emphasis on those which will affect the working practices of, or will otherwise be of interest to, mycologists. The topics covered include the re-naming of the Code, the acceptance of English as an alternative to Latin for validating diagnoses, conditions for permitting electronic publication of names, mandatory deposit of key nomenclatural information in a recognized repository for the valid publication of fungal names, the discontinuance of dual nomenclature for pleomorphic fungi, clarification of the typification of sanctioned names, and acceptability of names originally published under the zoological code. Collectively, these changes are the most fundamental to have been enacted at a single Congress since the 1950s, and herald the dawn of a new era in the practice of fungal nomenclature.

[1]  V. Demoulin (185-190) Proposals to amend Articles 15, 36 and 45 , 2010 .

[2]  Andrew N. Miller,et al.  MycoKeys, or why we need a new journal in mycology? , 2011 .

[3]  W. Greuter,et al.  Synopsis of Proposals on Botanical Nomenclature - Vienna 2005. A Review of the Proposals concerning the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature Submitted to the XVII International Botanical Congress , 1993 .

[4]  D. Hawksworth,et al.  Steps along the road to a harmonized bionomenclature. , 1995 .

[5]  Lorelei L. Norvell,et al.  Fungal nomenclature. 1. Melbourne approves a new Code , 2011 .

[6]  P. Crous,et al.  (016-020) Proposals to amend the Code to make clear that it covers the nomenclature of fungi, and to modify its governance with respect to names of organisms treated as fungi , 2009 .

[7]  George M. Garrity,et al.  Draft BioCode 2011: principles and rules regulating the naming of organisms. , 2011 .

[8]  D. Nicolson A History of Botanical Nomenclature , 1991 .

[9]  G. C. Ainsworth,et al.  Mycological Taxonomic Literature and Publication , 1955 .

[10]  John W. Taylor,et al.  One Fungus = One Name: DNA and fungal nomenclature twenty years after PCR , 2011, IMA fungus.

[11]  S. Redhead Report on the Special Committee on the Nomenclature of Fungi with a Pleomorphic Life Cycle , 2010 .

[12]  Seung-Beom Hong,et al.  The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature , 2011, IMA fungus.

[13]  Z. Pouzar,et al.  A SOLUTION OF THE STARTING POINT PROBLEM IN THE NOMENCLATURE OF FUNGI , 1981 .

[14]  Nicholas J. Turland,et al.  Report of the Special Committee on Electronic Publication , 2010 .

[15]  G. Rambold,et al.  Fungal nomenclature 3 : A critical response to the ‘Amsterdam Declaration’ , 2011 .

[16]  John McNeill,et al.  International code of botanical nomenclature (Vienna Code) : adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005 , 2006 .

[17]  Kevin D. Hyde,et al.  (117-119) Proposals to make the pre-publication deposit of key nomenclatural information in a recognized repository a requirement for valid publication of organisms treated as fungi under the Code , 2010 .

[18]  P. Kirk,et al.  (048-051) Proposals to exclude the phylum Microsporidia from the Code , 2009 .

[19]  A. Koekkoek Contributions to the discussion , 2003 .

[20]  P. Kirk,et al.  Draft BioCode (2011) Principles and Rules regulating the naming of organisms New draft, revised in November 2010 , 2011 .

[21]  R. Petersen,et al.  IMC9 Edinburgh Nomenclature Sessions , 2010, IMA fungus.

[22]  P. Crous,et al.  Molecules, morphology and classification: towards monophyletic genera in the Ascomycetes , 2000 .

[23]  D. Reynolds,et al.  Article 59 : reinterpretation or revision , 1992 .

[24]  John McNeill,et al.  XVII International Botanical Congress: preliminary mail vote and report of Congress action on nomenclature proposals , 2005 .

[25]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Progress in molecular and morphological taxon discovery in Fungi and options for formal classification of environmental sequences , 2011 .