Design for Sustainability (DfS): the interface of sustainable production and consumption

Abstract Nowadays design is faced with the challenge to contribute to the transition towards a sustainable society. Design for Sustainability (DfS) is the response to this challenge. It includes but goes beyond what Design for the Environment or ecodesign provides, by integrating social, economic, environmental and institutional aspects and by offering opportunities to get involved, express one’s own identity beyond consuming standardised mass products. DEEDS, a Leonardo research project, had the mission to embed sustainability in design and design in sustainability. For this behalf, the project partners approached the issue from the angles of design, sustainability science and sustainable consumption analysis, developing tools and rules (the SCALES principles) to support DfS and to incorporate it into design education and practice. The paper describes the framework conditions as explored by sustainable consumption research, the obstacles identified by DEEDS and gives hints how to overcome them based in the lessons learnt in the course of the project.

[1]  M. Fischer-Kowalski,et al.  Society's Metabolism , 1998 .

[2]  Carmela Cucuzzella,et al.  The Precautionary Principle as a Framework for Sustainable Design: Attempts to Counter the Rebound Effects of Production and Consumption , 2008 .

[3]  Frederic P. Miller,et al.  IPCC fourth assessment report , 2009 .

[4]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[5]  R. Veenhoven.  The study of life-satisfaction , 1996 .

[6]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  Environmentally sustainable household consumption: from aggregate environmental pressures to priority fields of action , 2002 .

[7]  I. Fisher,et al.  The Nature of Capital and Income , 1965 .

[8]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[9]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress , 2011 .

[10]  F. Schmidt‐bleek.  Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch , 1994 .

[11]  M. Cogoy,et al.  The consumer as a social and environmental actor , 1999 .

[12]  V. Packard,et al.  Hidden Persuaders , 1977 .

[13]  J. Spangenberg,et al.  A methodology for CSR reporting: assuring a representative diversity of indicators across stakeholders, scales, sites and performance issues , 2008 .

[14]  Joachim H. Spangenberg.  Sustainable development indicators: towards integrated systems as a tool for managing and monitoring a complex transition , 2009 .

[15]  Manfred Max-Neef,et al.  Human Scale Development , 2009 .

[16]  Manasi Kumar,et al.  Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective , 2008 .

[17]  C. Taylor,et al.  Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[18]  I. Røpke.  The dynamics of willingness to consume , 1999 .

[19]  Charles Jencks,et al.  Theories and manifestoes of contemporary architecture , 1997 .

[20]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[21]  Karin Jaschke,et al.  DEEDS: a teaching and learning resource to help mainstream sustainability into everyday design teaching and professional practice , 2009 .

[22]  J. Dutoit.  The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2007 .

[23]  Tim Jackson,et al.  The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Consumption , 2006 .

[24]  L. Mainwaring,et al.  Environmental values and the frame of reference , 2001 .