Organizational Discourse as a Social Defense: Taming the Tiger of Electronic Government

This paper focuses on the role of discourse as a means of conferring identity and reducing task-related anxiety. Seeing discourse in this essentially defensive light leads to a new perspective on resistance to organizational change, portraying it as a threat to the defense structure of established discourses. To illustrate, the nascent discourse of electronic government will be examined. Although a potent new discourse, e-government clashes strongly with the discursively embedded social defense systems of local government. A case study is reported in a UK local authority. Drawing on actor network theory, it is shown how the hegemonic influence of the social defenses translated the radical rhetoric of e-government into an operational discourse that was bland and unthreatening.

[1]  L. Gould,et al.  The Systems Psychodynamics of a Joint Venture: Anxiety Social Defenses, and the Management of Mutual Dependence , 1999 .

[2]  Lawrence Pratchett.  New Technologies and the Modernization of Local Government: an Analysis of Biases and Constraints , 1999 .

[3]  David Wastell,et al.  The fetish of technique: methodology as a social defence , 1996 .

[4]  Rachel Silcock.  What is E-government , 2001 .

[5]  David Graham Wastell,et al.  Learning Dysfunctions in Information Systems Development: Overcoming The Social Defenses With Transitional Objects , 1999, MIS Q..

[6]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[7]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations through Discourse Analysis , 2000 .

[8]  A. Lowe,et al.  The construction of a network at Health Waikato. The "towards clinical budgeting" project. , 2000, Journal of management in medicine.

[9]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Facilitating Technology Transfer Through Partnership : Learning from Practice and Research , 1997 .

[10]  J. Little,et al.  Social Policy and Humanity: The Use of Language as a Social Defence Against Anxiety , 2001 .

[11]  Alison Linstead,et al.  Losing the Plot? Middle Managers and Identity , 2002 .

[12]  W. Kinsella.  Discourse, Power, and Knowledge in the Management of “Big Science” , 1999 .

[13]  Larry Hirschhorn,et al.  The Workplace Within: Psychodynamics of Organizational Life. , 1988 .

[14]  Leonard D. Goodstein,et al.  The Workplace Within: The Psychodynamics of Organizational Life , 1989 .

[15]  G. Longford,et al.  Digital Restructuring: Gender, Class and Citizenship in the Information Society in Canada , 2000 .

[16]  Richard Vidgen,et al.  Technology transfer: diffusion or translation? , 1997 .

[17]  Steven W. Usselman,et al.  The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America by Paul N. Edwards (review) , 1997, Technology and Culture.

[18]  Hans Doorewaard,et al.  The Osmosis of Ideas: An Analysis of the Integrated Approach to IT Management from a Translation Theory Perspective , 2001 .

[19]  Susan Long,et al.  The Tyranny of the Customer and the Cost of Consumerism: An Analysis Using Systems and Psychoanalytic Approaches to Groups and Society , 1999 .

[20]  D. Eagle,et al.  Community informatics : shaping computer-mediated social relations , 2001 .

[21]  C. Pearson.  Money talks? Competing discourses in the implementation of direct payments , 2000 .

[22]  C. Hardy,et al.  Discourse as a Strategic Resource , 2000 .

[23]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[24]  The construction of a network at Health Waikato. The "towards clinical budgeting" project. , 2000 .

[25]  Alan D. Lowe,et al.  Accounting information systems as knowledge-objects: Some effects of objectualization , 2001 .

[26]  David Wilson,et al.  Local Government in the United Kingdom , 1994 .