Virtual Workbench: Near-Field Virtual Environment System with Applications

A prototype near-field virtual environment system is described that incorporates a CrystalEyes stereoscopic display (viewed in a mirror), a PHANToM manipulandum, and a stereo auditory display. The apparatus, which was designed to achieve registration of three sensory modalities (visual, haptic, and auditory), has a wide range of applications and has been used for both psychophysics and training research. Calibration-verification experiments are described in which human subjects positioned a physical probe attached to the manipulandum so that it appeared to coincide with a visual target on the stereoscopic display. The readings from the manipulandum and the calculated positions of the targets corresponded roughly within 0.5 cm over a large volume, although differences greater than 1 cm were observed near the sides of the workspace. The calibration of the manipulandum was tested independently on the z axis (running through the center of the workspace), and the perceived depth of the targets (probe z coordinate) was found to agree with the calculated depth within the accuracy of the measurements ( 0.4 cm). Some subjects had poorer positioning resolution when the visual target was far from the plane of the display screen (although their mean response was unaffected), and we hypothesize that this may have been caused by the different levels of accommodation that were needed to view the physical probe and the displayed target.

[1]  Yei-Yu Yeh.  Visual and perceptual issues in stereoscopic color displays , 1993 .

[2]  Warren Robinett,et al.  The Visual Display Transformation for Virtual Reality , 1995, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Christopher Schmandt,et al.  Spatial input/display correspondence in a stereoscopic computer graphic work station , 1983, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  Philip J. Bos.  Liquid-crystal shutter systems for time-multiplexed stereoscopic displays , 1993 .

[5]  David Zeltzer.  Virtual environment technology , 1991, Electronic Imaging.

[6]  R. Patterson,et al.  Factors that Affect Depth Perception in Stereoscopic Displays , 1992, Human factors.

[7]  Clifton Schor.  Spatial constraints of stereopsis in video displays , 1991 .

[8]  Michael Cohen,et al.  The design of multidimensional sound interfaces , 1995 .

[9]  David F. McAllister,et al.  Computing stereoscopic views , 1993 .

[10]  Thomas Harold Massie,et al.  Initial haptic explorations with the phantom : virtual touch through point interaction , 1996 .

[11]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head‐mounted display , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[12]  Thomas H. Massie,et al.  The PHANToM Haptic Interface: A Device for Probing Virtual Objects , 1994 .

[13]  Warren Robinett,et al.  A Computational Model for the Stereoscopic Optics of a Head-Mounted Display , 1991, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  Wayne L. Wooten,et al.  Reducing crosstalk between stereoscopic views , 1994, Electronic Imaging.

[15]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Towards Quantifying Depth and Size Perception in Virtual Environments , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[16]  R. Patterson,et al.  Human Stereopsis , 1992, Human factors.

[17]  David Walter Schloerb,et al.  Adaptation of perceived depth related to changes of the effective interpupuillary distance in computer-graphic steroscopic displays , 1997 .

[18]  S. Ellis,et al.  Distance Perception of Stereoscopically Presented Virtual Objects Optically Superimposed on Physical Objects by a Head-Mounted See-Through Display , 1994 .

[19]  Larry F. Hodges,et al.  Geometric Considerations for Stereoscopic Virtual Environments , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[20]  Larry F. Hodges,et al.  Relevant Cues for the Visual Perception of Depth: Is Where You See it Where it is? , 1994 .

[21]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Adaptation to supernormal auditory localization cues in an auditory virtual environment , 1994 .

[22]  David Zeltzer,et al.  Three Dimensional Visual Display Systems for Virtual Environments , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[23]  Fumio Kishino,et al.  Effects of fuzziness in perception of stereoscopically presented virtual object location , 1995, Other Conferences.

[24]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  Issues in the design of studies to test the effectiveness of stereo imaging , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[25]  Larry F. Hodges,et al.  Human stereopsis, fusion, and stereoscopic virtual environments , 1995 .

[26]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments , 1995, Vision Research.

[27]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computation and psychophysics of sensorimotor integration , 1996 .

[28]  Simon K. Rushton,et al.  Binocular vision in a bi-ocular world: new-generation head-mounted displays avoid causing visual deficit , 1994 .

[29]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  The Relationship of Binocular Convergence and Errors in Judged Distance to Virtual Objects , 1995 .

[30]  Thomas Harold Massie,et al.  Design of a three degree of freedom force-reflecting haptic interface , 1993 .

[31]  Gregg Podnar,et al.  Geometry of binocular imaging , 1994, Electronic Imaging.

[32]  Stephen R. Ellis.  Origins and elements of virtual environments , 1995 .

[33]  Luis Serra,et al.  The virtual workbench: dextrous VR , 1994 .

[34]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Asymmetrical Spatial Accuracy in 3D Tracking , 1994 .

[35]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Calibration and evaluation of virtual environment displays , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE Research Properties in Virtual Reality Symposium.