Chemotactic responses of Escherichia coli to small jumps of photoreleased L-aspartate.

Computer-assisted motion analysis coupled to flash photolysis of caged chemoeffectors provides a means for time-resolved analysis of bacterial chemotaxis. Escherichia coli taxis toward the amino acid attractant L-aspartate is mediated by the Tar receptor. The physiology of this response, as well as Tar structure and biochemistry, has been studied extensively. The beta-2, 6-dinitrobenzyl ester of L-aspartic acid and the 1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethyl ether of 8-hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-tris-sulfonic acid were synthesized. These compounds liberated L-aspartate and the fluorophore 8-hydroxypyrene 1,3,6-tris-sulfonic acid (pyranine) upon irradiation with near-UV light. Photorelease of the fluorophore was used to define the amplitude and temporal stability of the aspartate jumps employed in chemotaxis experiments. The dependence of chemotactic adaptation times on aspartate concentration, determined in mixing experiments, was best fit by two Tar aspartate-binding sites. Signal processing (excitation) times, amplitudes, and adaptive recovery of responses elicited by aspartate jumps producing less than 20% change in receptor occupancy were characterized in photorelease assays. Aspartate concentration jumps in the nanomolar range elicited measurable responses. The response threshold and sensitivity of swimming bacteria matched those of bacteria tethered to glass by a single flagellum. Stimuli of similar magnitude, delivered either by rapid mixing or photorelease, evoked responses of similar strength, as assessed by recovery time measurements. These times remained proportional to change in receptor occupancy close to threshold, irrespective of prior occupancy. Motor excitation responses decayed exponentially with time. Rates of excitation responses near threshold ranged from 2 to 7 s-1. These values are consistent with control of excitation signaling by decay of phosphorylated pools of the response regulator protein, CheY. Excitation response rates increased slightly with stimulus size up to values limited by the instrumentation; the most rapid was measured to be 16 +/- 3 (SE) s-1. This increase may reflect simultaneous activation of CheY dephosphorylation, together with inhibition of its phosphorylation.

[1]  S. Chervitz,et al.  The two-component signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis: a molecular view of signal transduction by receptors, kinases, and adaptation enzymes. , 1997, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[2]  Frederick W. Dahlquist,et al.  Assembly of an MCP receptor, CheW, and kinase CheA complex in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway , 1992, Cell.

[3]  D. Koshland,et al.  Global flexibility in a sensory receptor: a site-directed cross-linking approach. , 1987, Science.

[4]  Joanne I. Yeh,et al.  Three-dimensional structures of the ligand-binding domain of the bacterial aspartate receptor with and without a ligand. , 1995, Science.

[5]  D. Koshland,et al.  Attractant- and disulfide-induced conformational changes in the ligand binding domain of the chemotaxis aspartate receptor: a 19F NMR study. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[6]  J. Adler,et al.  The Range of Attractant Concentrations for Bacterial Chemotaxis and the Threshold and Size of Response over This Range , 1973, The Journal of general physiology.

[7]  Kenji Oosawa,et al.  Phosphorylation of three proteins in the signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis , 1988, Cell.

[8]  D. Webb,et al.  Photoluminescence of solutions , 1969 .

[9]  M. Eisenbach,et al.  Phosphorylation-dependent binding of the chemotaxis signal molecule CheY to its phosphatase, CheZ. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[10]  R. Stewart,et al.  CheZ mutants with enhanced ability to dephosphorylate CheY, the response regulator in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1993, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[11]  H. Berg,et al.  A miniature flow cell designed for rapid exchange of media under high-power microscope objectives. , 1984, Journal of general microbiology.

[12]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  Signal processing times in bacterial chemotaxis , 1982, Nature.

[13]  H. Berg,et al.  Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  G. P. Reid,et al.  Excitatory signaling in bacterial probed by caged chemoeffectors. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[15]  S. Khan,et al.  Chemotactic signal integration in bacteria. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  G D Schellenberg,et al.  Resolution of the multiplicity of the glutamate and aspartate transport systems of Escherichia coli. , 1977, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  D. Koshland,et al.  Mutagenic studies of the interaction between the aspartate receptor and methyltransferase from Escherichia coli. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[18]  H. Berg,et al.  Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis: regulation of demethylation , 1985, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  J. Adler,et al.  Protein methylation in behavioural control mechanisms and in signal transduction , 1979, Nature.

[21]  R. Macnab,et al.  The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  D E Koshland,et al.  Aspartate receptors of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium bind ligand with negative and half-of-the-sites cooperativity. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[23]  A. Delcour Function and modulation of bacterial porins: insights from electrophysiology. , 1997, FEMS microbiology letters.

[24]  D. Koshland,et al.  Quantitation of the sensory response in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  D. Blair,et al.  How bacteria sense and swim. , 1995, Annual review of microbiology.

[26]  D. Koshland,et al.  Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell , 1976, Nature.

[27]  J. Nerbonne Design and application of photolabile intracellular probes. , 1986, Society of General Physiologists series.

[28]  H Wang,et al.  Characterization of the CheAS/CheZ complex: a specific interaction resulting in enhanced dephosphorylating activity on CheY‐phosphate , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  J. Armitage,et al.  Biology of the chemotactic response , 1990 .

[30]  J. Sekelsky,et al.  Use of a computer to assay motility in bacteria. , 1988, Analytical biochemistry.

[31]  G. P. Reid,et al.  Bacterial chemoreceptor signaling probed by flash photorelease of a caged serine. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[32]  G. P. Reid,et al.  [16] Synthesis and properties of caged nucleotides , 1989 .

[33]  W. Kay Two aspartate transport systems in Escherichia coli. , 1971, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[34]  D. Koshland,et al.  Multiple kinetic states for the flagellar motor switch , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[35]  P. S. Kim,et al.  Imitation of Escherichia coli Aspartate Receptor Signaling in Engineered Dimers of the Cytoplasmic Domain , 1996, Science.

[36]  G. P. Reid,et al.  Photolabile 1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethyl phosphate esters of adenine nucleotide analogs. Synthesis and mechanism of photolysis , 1988 .

[37]  P. Gardina,et al.  Attractant Signaling by an Aspartate Chemoreceptor Dimer with a Single Cytoplasmic Domain , 1996, Science.

[38]  J. Stock,et al.  Roles of the highly conserved aspartate and lysine residues in the response regulator of bacterial chemotaxis. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[39]  D E Koshland,et al.  Membrane receptors for aspartate and serine in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1979, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  H. Berg,et al.  Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[41]  M. Gutman,et al.  Fast Redox Perturbation of Aqueous Solution by Photoexcitation of Pyranine , 1996 .

[42]  D. Koshland,et al.  Tuning the responsiveness of a sensory receptor via covalent modification. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[43]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[44]  R. Weis,et al.  The serine receptor of bacterial chemotaxis exhibits half-site saturation for serine binding. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[45]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Signal Transduction via the Multi-Step Phosphorelay: Not Necessarily a Road Less Traveled , 1996, Cell.

[46]  D. Brown,et al.  Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  D. Bray,et al.  Computer analysis of the binding reactions leading to a transmembrane receptor-linked multiprotein complex involved in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1995, Molecular biology of the cell.

[48]  J. Corrie,et al.  Synthesis of photoactivatable fluorescein derivatives bearing side chains with varying properties , 1995 .

[49]  D. Bray,et al.  Signaling complexes: biophysical constraints on intracellular communication. , 1998, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[50]  M. J. Gradwell,et al.  Time-Resolved Infrared Spectroscopy of Intermediates and Products from Photolysis of 1-(2-Nitrophenyl)ethyl Phosphates: Reaction of the 2-Nitrosoacetophenone Byproduct with Thiols , 1997 .

[51]  M. Eisenbach,et al.  Control of bacterial chemotaxis , 1996, Molecular microbiology.