Material Constitution and the Trinity

(Forthcoming in Faith and Philosophy) Abstract. The Christian doctrine of the Trinity poses a serious philosophical problem. On the one hand, it seems to imply that there is exactly one divine being; on the other hand, it seems to imply that there are three. There is another well-known philosophical problem that presents us with a similar sort of tension: the problem of material constitution. We argue in this paper that a relatively neglected solution to the problem of material constitution can be developed into a novel solution to the problem of the Trinity.

[1]  THREE PHILOSOPHERS , 1935 .

[2]  K. J. Clark.  Trinity or Tritheism? , 1996, Religious Studies.

[3]  D. Robinson.  Can amoebae divide without multiplying , 1985 .

[4]  Michael Rea.  Constitution and Kind Membership , 2000 .

[5]  Jeffrey E. Brower.  Abelard on the Trinity , 2004 .

[6]  Cornelius A. Plantinga.  Gregory of Nyssa and the Social Analogy of the Trinity , 2017 .

[7]  James Cain.  The Doctrine of the Trinity and the Logic of Relative Identity , 1989, Religious Studies.

[8]  Lynne Baker on Material Constitution , 2002 .

[9]  L. Baker.  Persons and Bodies , 2000, African American Literature in Transition, 1865–1880.

[10]  A. Martinich.  Identity and Trinity , 1978, The Journal of Religion.

[11]  James E. Tomberlin,et al.  On the Plurality of Worlds. , 1989 .

[12]  D. Brown.  The Divine Trinity , 1985 .

[13]  A. Martinich.  God, Emperor and Relative Identity , 2015 .

[14]  C. Layman.  Tritheism and the Trinity , 1988 .

[15]  R. B. Redmon,et al.  Identity , 2021, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[16]  Michael Rea,et al.  Sameness without identity : An aristotelian solution to the problem of material constitution , 1998 .

[17]  Steven L. Porter.  SWINBURNIAN ATONEMENT AND THE DOCTRINE OF PENAL SUBSTITUTION , 2004 .

[18]  George H. Williams.  The Philosophy of the Church Fathers , 1957, Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture.

[19]  Lloyd Reinhardt,et al.  Ontology, Causality, and Mind: Essays on the Philosophy of D. M. Armstrong , 1993 .

[20]  D. Zimmerman.  Persons and Bodies: Constitution Without Mereology? , 2002 .

[21]  S. Davis.  A Somewhat Playful Proof of the Social Trinity in Five Easy Steps , 1999 .

[22]  R. Routley,et al.  Towards a Logic of Relative Identity , 1979 .

[23]  T. Bartel.  Could there Be More than One Almighty? , 1993, Religious Studies.

[24]  R. Swinburne.  The Christian God , 1994 .

[25]  T. Merricks.  Split Brains and the Godhead , 2006 .

[26]  Dean W. Zimmerman,et al.  Theories of Masses and Problems of Constitution , 1995 .

[27]  Michael Rea.  Relative Identity and the Doctrine of the Trinity , 2020, Essays in Analytic Theology.

[28]  David Lewis,et al.  Many, but Almost One , 2020, Interpreting Bodies.

[29]  T. Bartel.  The Plight of the Relative Trinitarian , 1988, Religious Studies.

[30]  P. Forrest.  Divine Fission: A New Way of Moderating Social Trinitarianism , 1998, Religious Studies.

[31]  Derk Pereboom.  On Baker's Persons and Bodies , 2002 .

[32]  E. Feser.  Swinburne's Tritheism , 1997 .

[33]  R. Feenstra,et al.  Trinity, Incarnation, and Atonement: Philosophical and Theological Essays , 1992 .

[34]  Lynne Rudder Baker,et al.  UNITY WITHOUT IDENTITY : A NEW LOOK AT MATERIAL CONSTITUTION , 1999 .