Drug repurposing a reality: from computers to the clinic

Modern drug discovery has reached a roadblock, suffering a diminished pipeline with escalating costs, development times and safety concerns coupled to a very low chance of success [1–3]. As seren dipitous discoveries dwindle, there is a need for a shift from traditional drug discovery to the concept of drug repositioning, where currently approved drugs are repurposed for new indications. The technology to evaluate or re-evaluate new diseases, targets, pathways and functions continues to evolve so that research-led repositioning rather than random screening is now a viable strategic model for rapid drug development. Indeed, the number of repositioning publications is growing rapidly with the promise of reduced drug development costs and timelines. Using drug repositioning, pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions have achieved a number of successes, and the rate of new indication approval is growing every year [4]. A major advantage of utilizing approved drugs, given their previously successful clinical trials, is the potential for fast entry into Phase II trials for new indications. Therefore, the benefits of increased success rate and decreased costs, resources and development time make drug repurposing an ideal process to kick start productivity in drug development.

[1]  A. Barabasi,et al.  The human disease network , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Paul A Clemons,et al.  The Connectivity Map: Using Gene-Expression Signatures to Connect Small Molecules, Genes, and Disease , 2006, Science.

[3]  Ragini Pandey,et al.  C2Maps: a network pharmacology database with comprehensive disease-gene-drug connectivity relationships , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[4]  T. Ashburn,et al.  Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[5]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Drug Discovery Using Chemical Systems Biology: Repositioning the Safe Medicine Comtan to Treat Multi-Drug and Extensively Drug Resistant Tuberculosis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  Michael J. Keiser,et al.  Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  S. Mathur,et al.  Drug repositioning using disease associated biological processes and network analysis of drug targets. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[8]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Drug Discovery Using Chemical Systems Biology: Weak Inhibition of Multiple Kinases May Contribute to the Anti-Cancer Effect of Nelfinavir , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Yan Wang,et al.  Characterizing the Network of Drugs and Their Affected Metabolic Subpathways , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  Hua Xu,et al.  DTome: a web-based tool for drug-target interactome construction , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[12]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Computational methods for biomolecular docking. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[13]  Guanghui Hu,et al.  Human Disease-Drug Network Based on Genomic Expression Profiles , 2009, PloS one.

[14]  Oakland J. Peters,et al.  Predicting new indications for approved drugs using a proteochemometric method. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  S. Lawrence Pipelines turn to biotech , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Mohammed H Bohari,et al.  FDA approved drugs complexed to their targets: evaluating pose prediction accuracy of docking protocols , 2012, Journal of Molecular Modeling.

[17]  A. Chiang,et al.  Systematic Evaluation of Drug–Disease Relationships to Identify Leads for Novel Drug Uses , 2009, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[18]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  HUMAN DISEASE , 1957, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[19]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Drug—target network , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Charles C. Persinger,et al.  How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.