Chronic Myeloid Leukemia , Version 1 . 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is defined by the presence of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), resulting from a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 [t(9;22] that gives rise to a BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. CML occurs in 3 different phases (chronic, accelerated, and blast phase) and is usually diagnosed in the chronic phase. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is a highly effective first-line treatment option for all patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML (CP-CML). The selection TKI therapy should be based on the risk score, toxicity profile of TKI, patient’s age, ability to tolerate therapy, and the presence of comorbid conditions. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with CP-CML. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018;16(9):1108–1135 doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0071 NCCN Categories of Evidence and Consensus Category 1: Based upon high-level evidence, there is uniform NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate. Category 2A: Based upon lower-level evidence, there is uniform NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate. Category 2B: Based upon lower-level evidence, there is NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate. Category 3: Based upon any level of evidence, there is major NCCN disagreement that the intervention is appropriate. All recommendations are category 2A unless otherwise noted. Clinical trials: NCCN believes that the best management for any cancer patient is in a clinical trial. Participation in clinical trials is especially encouraged. Please Note The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) are a statement of consensus of the authors regarding their views of currently accepted approaches to treatment. Any clinician seeking to apply or consult the NCCN Guidelines® is expected to use independent medical judgment in the context of individual clinical circumstances to determine any patient’s care or treatment. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) makes no representation or warranties of any kind regarding their content, use, or application and disclaims any responsibility for their applications or use in any way. The full NCCN Guidelines for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia are not printed in this issue of JNCCN but can be accessed online at NCCN.org. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2018, All rights reserved. The NCCN Guidelines and the illustrations herein may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN. Disclosures for the NCCN Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Panel At the beginning of each NCCN Guidelines panel meeting, panel members review all potential conflicts of interest. NCCN, in keeping with its commitment to public transparency, publishes these disclosures for panel members, staff, and NCCN itself. Individual disclosures for the NCCN Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Panel members can be found on page 1135. (The most recent version of these guidelines and accompanying disclosures are available on the NCCN Web site at NCCN.org.) These guidelines are also available on the Internet. For the latest update, visit NCCN.org.

[1]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Ponatinib efficacy and safety in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia: final 5-year results of the phase 2 PACE trial. , 2018, Blood.

[2]  Z. Estrov,et al.  Early results of lower dose dasatinib (50 mg daily) as frontline therapy for newly diagnosed chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia , 2018, Cancer.

[3]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in chronic myeloid leukaemia (EURO-SKI): a prespecified interim analysis of a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, trial. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  J. Sakamoto,et al.  Final 3‐year Results of the Dasatinib Discontinuation Trial in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Received Dasatinib as a Second‐line Treatment , 2018, Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia.

[5]  J. Radich,et al.  Durable treatment-free remission in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase following frontline nilotinib: 96-week update of the ENESTfreedom study , 2018, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. Lipton,et al.  Treatment-Free Remission After Second-Line Nilotinib Treatment in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase , 2018, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Prognostic significance of additional chromosomal abnormalities at the time of diagnosis in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors , 2018, American journal of hematology.

[8]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Bosutinib Versus Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results From the Randomized BFORE Trial , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  P. Rousselot,et al.  Second tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation attempt in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia , 2017, Cancer.

[10]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Clonal chromosomal abnormalities appearing in Philadelphia chromosome-negative metaphases during CML treatment. , 2017, Blood.

[11]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Assessment of imatinib as first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: 10-year survival results of the randomized CML study IV and impact of non-CML determinants , 2017, Leukemia.

[12]  J. Byrne,et al.  De-escalation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor dose in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia with stable major molecular response (DESTINY): an interim analysis of a non-randomised, phase 2 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Haematology.

[13]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  Long‐Term Outcomes of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  M. Tulliez,et al.  Discontinuation of dasatinib or nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: interim analysis of the STOP 2G-TKI study. , 2017, Blood.

[15]  M. Tulliez,et al.  Long-Term Follow-Up of the French Stop Imatinib (STIM1) Study in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  U. Olsson‐Strömberg,et al.  Increased proportion of mature NK cells is associated with successful imatinib discontinuation in chronic myeloid leukemia , 2016, Leukemia.

[17]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Prognostic Discrimination in "GoodRisk" Chronic Granulocytic Leukemia , 2017 .

[18]  J. Cortes,et al.  Switching to nilotinib versus imatinib dose escalation in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase with suboptimal response to imatinib (LASOR): a randomised, open-label trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Haematology.

[19]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Long‐term bosutinib for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of imatinib plus dasatinib and/or nilotinib , 2016, American journal of hematology.

[20]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Dasatinib in imatinib‐resistant or ‐intolerant chronic‐phase, chronic myeloid leukemia patients: 7‐year follow‐up of study CA180‐034 , 2016, American journal of hematology.

[21]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Risk stratification of chromosomal abnormalities in chronic myelogenous leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. , 2016, Blood.

[22]  Sukjoong Oh,et al.  Imatinib withdrawal syndrome and longer duration of imatinib have a close association with a lower molecular relapse after treatment discontinuation: the KID study , 2016, Haematologica.

[23]  J. Cortes,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of a Switch to Nilotinib on Imatinib-Related Chronic Low-Grade Adverse Events in Patients With CML-CP: The ENRICH Study. , 2016, Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia.

[24]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Final 5-Year Study Results of DASISION: The Dasatinib Versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naïve Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Trial. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Compound mutations in BCR-ABL1 are not major drivers of primary or secondary resistance to ponatinib in CP-CML patients. , 2016, Blood.

[26]  I. Flinn,et al.  Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial , 2016, Leukemia.

[27]  T. McDonnell,et al.  Clinical and prognostic significance of 3q26.2 and other chromosome 3 abnormalities in CML in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2015, Blood.

[28]  S. Redaelli,et al.  Age and dPCR can predict relapse in CML patients who discontinued imatinib: The ISAV study , 2015, American journal of hematology.

[29]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Impact of unbalanced minor route versus major route karyotypes at diagnosis on prognosis of CML , 2015, Annals of Hematology.

[30]  J. Cortes,et al.  Chromosomal rearrangement involving 11q23 locus in chronic myelogenous leukemia: a rare phenomenon frequently associated with disease progression and poor prognosis , 2015, Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

[31]  J. Sakamoto,et al.  Shorter halving time of BCR‐ABL1 transcripts is a novel predictor for achievement of molecular responses in newly diagnosed chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with dasatinib: Results of the D‐first study of Kanto CML study group , 2015, American journal of hematology.

[32]  C. Tam,et al.  TIDEL-II: first-line use of imatinib in CML with early switch to nilotinib for failure to achieve time-dependent molecular targets. , 2015, Blood.

[33]  J. Seymour,et al.  The Adverse Effect of High Sokal Risk for First Line Imatinib Treated Patients Is Overcome By a Rapid Rate of BCR-ABL Decline Measured As Early As 1 Month of Treatment , 2014 .

[34]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Impact of Dose Intensity of Ponatinib on Selected Adverse Events: Multivariate Analyses from a Pooled Population of Clinical Trial Patients , 2014 .

[35]  H. Einsele,et al.  Velocity of early BCR-ABL transcript elimination as an optimized predictor of outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in chronic phase on treatment with imatinib , 2014, Leukemia.

[36]  J. Radich,et al.  Correlations between cytogenetic and molecular monitoring among patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: post hoc analyses of the Rationale and Insight for Gleevec High-Dose Therapy study. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[37]  Nicola D. Roberts,et al.  Prognosis for patients with CML and >10% BCR-ABL1 after 3 months of imatinib depends on the rate of BCR-ABL1 decline. , 2014, Blood.

[38]  Susan Branford,et al.  Long-term response to imatinib is not affected by the initial dose in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: final update from the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Optimization and Selectivity (TOPS) study , 2014, International Journal of Hematology.

[39]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Association between regular molecular monitoring and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy adherence in chronic myelogenous leukemia in the chronic phase , 2014, Current medical research and opinion.

[40]  J. Cayuela,et al.  Loss of major molecular response as a trigger for restarting tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia who have stopped imatinib after durable undetectable disease. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Early response with dasatinib or imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: 3-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). , 2014, Blood.

[42]  J. Radich,et al.  Imatinib 800 mg daily induces deeper molecular responses than imatinib 400 mg daily: results of SWOG S0325, an intergroup randomized PHASE II trial in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia , 2014, British journal of haematology.

[43]  Y. Ishigatsubo,et al.  European Treatment and Outcome Study score does not predict imatinib treatment response and outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia patients , 2014, Cancer science.

[44]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Implications of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain-mediated resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2014, Leukemia research.

[45]  N. Moore,et al.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: experience from 1216 patients at a centralized laboratory , 2013, Fundamental & clinical pharmacology.

[46]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Assessment at 6 months may be warranted for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with no major cytogenetic response at 3 months , 2013, Haematologica.

[47]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia previously treated with 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors including imatinib. , 2013, Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia.

[48]  W. M. Smit,et al.  Imatinib discontinuation in chronic phase myeloid leukaemia patients in sustained complete molecular response: a randomised trial of the Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial for Haemato-Oncology (HOVON). , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[49]  J. Melo,et al.  Safety and efficacy of imatinib cessation for CML patients with stable undetectable minimal residual disease: results from the TWISTER study. , 2013, Blood.

[50]  R. Maki,et al.  Effect of long term imatinib on bone in adults with chronic myelogenous leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2013, Leukemia research.

[51]  F. Giles,et al.  Rates of peripheral arterial occlusive disease in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase treated with imatinib, nilotinib, or non-tyrosine kinase therapy: a retrospective cohort analysis , 2013, Leukemia.

[52]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Phase 2 study of subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate for chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant to or intolerant of tyrosine kinase inhibitors , 2013, American journal of hematology.

[53]  K. Rezvani,et al.  Combining BCR-ABL1 transcript levels at 3 and 6 months in chronic myeloid leukemia: implications for early intervention strategies. , 2013, Blood.

[54]  G. Specchia,et al.  Chronic fatigue is the most important factor limiting health-related quality of life of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib , 2013, Leukemia.

[55]  J. Radich,et al.  Nilotinib in imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 48-month follow-up results of a phase II study , 2013, Leukemia.

[56]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Phase 2 study of subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate after TKI failure in patients with chronic-phase CML with T315I mutation. , 2012, Blood.

[57]  H. Einsele,et al.  Early molecular and cytogenetic response is predictive for long-term progression-free and overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) , 2012, Leukemia.

[58]  J. Radich,et al.  Chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients with low OCT-1 activity randomized to high-dose imatinib achieve better responses and have lower failure rates than those randomized to standard-dose imatinib , 2012, Haematologica.

[59]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  EUTOS score is not predictive for survival and outcome in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a single institution experience. , 2012, Blood.

[60]  M. Humbert,et al.  Résultats tardifs de la commissurotomie mitrale percutanée à 20 ans Création et validation d ’ un score de risque prédisant les résultats fonctionnels à long terme à partir d ’ une série de 912 patients , 2012 .

[61]  Katayoun Rezvani,et al.  Assessment of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels at 3 months is the only requirement for predicting outcome for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[62]  S. Oliveria,et al.  Adherence to treatment with second-line therapies, dasatinib and nilotinib, in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia , 2012, Current medical research and opinion.

[63]  M. Bissell Peripheral Blood Monitoring of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia During Treatment With Imatinib, Second-Line Agents, and Beyond , 2012 .

[64]  E. Jabbour,et al.  Managing side effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy to optimize adherence in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the role of the midlevel practitioner. , 2012, The journal of supportive oncology.

[65]  S. Ghio,et al.  Reversible pulmonary arterial hypertension likely related to long-term, low-dose dasatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukaemia. , 2012, Leukemia research.

[66]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Impact of additional cytogenetic aberrations at diagnosis on prognosis of CML: long-term observation of 1151 patients from the randomized CML Study IV. , 2011, Blood.

[67]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Front-line therapy with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: what is the optimal response? , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[68]  D. Marin,et al.  European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) score for chronic myeloid leukemia still requires more confirmation. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[69]  J. Hasford,et al.  Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score. , 2011, Blood.

[70]  P. Valent,et al.  Progressive peripheral arterial occlusive disease and other vascular events during nilotinib therapy in CML , 2011, American journal of hematology.

[71]  C. Baldwin,et al.  Comparison of autologous stem cell transplantation versus consolidation chemotherapy for patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN‐AML) and FLT3ITD , 2011, American journal of hematology.

[72]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Considerations in the management of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[73]  Stefan W Krause,et al.  Tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg/d versus 400 mg/d versus 400 mg/d plus interferon-α in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[74]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Long‐term prognostic impact of the use of erythropoietic‐stimulating agents in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with imatinib , 2011, Cancer.

[75]  T. Buclin,et al.  Drug interactions with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. , 2011, Blood.

[76]  Y. Aizawa,et al.  Myelodysplastic syndrome with Ph negative monosomy 7 chromosome following transient bone marrow dysplasia during imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2011, Internal medicine.

[77]  K. Rezvani,et al.  Poor adherence is the main reason for loss of CCyR and imatinib failure for chronic myeloid leukemia patients on long-term therapy. , 2010, Blood.

[78]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  The achievement of an early complete cytogenetic response is a major determinant for outcome in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2010, Blood.

[79]  B. Druker,et al.  patients treated with imatinib mesylate prognostic factors for hematologic relapse of chronic phase CML Clonal evolution and lack of cytogenetic response are adverse , 2011 .

[80]  Claude Preudhomme,et al.  Imatinib plus peginterferon alfa-2a in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[81]  J. Griffin,et al.  Retrospective real-world comparison of medical visits, costs, and adherence between nilotinib and dasatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia , 2010, Current medical research and opinion.

[82]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS). , 2010, Blood.

[83]  Philippe Rousselot,et al.  Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[84]  D. Colomer,et al.  Early intervention during imatinib therapy in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a study of the Spanish PETHEMA group , 2010, Haematologica.

[85]  Z. Estrov,et al.  Survival outcomes for clonal evolution in chronic myeloid leukemia patients on second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy , 2010, Cancer.

[86]  D. Marin,et al.  Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who achieve complete cytogenetic responses on imatinib. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[87]  J. Cortes,et al.  Dasatinib 100 mg once daily minimizes the occurrence of pleural effusion in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase and efficacy is unaffected in patients who develop pleural effusion , 2010, Cancer.

[88]  S. Sanabani,et al.  Efficacy and Tolerability after Unusually Low Doses of Dasatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Intolerant to Standard-Dose Dasatinib Therapy , 2010, Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology.

[89]  J. Radich,et al.  Six-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia , 2010, Leukemia.

[90]  R. A. Larson,et al.  Clinical Trials and Observations , 2022 .

[91]  C. Carcassi,et al.  Chronic myeloid leukemia: a prospective comparison of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome banding analysis for the definition of complete cytogenetic response: a study of the GIMEMA CML WP. , 2009, Blood.

[92]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Dasatinib treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: analysis of responses according to preexisting BCR-ABL mutations. , 2009, Blood.

[93]  Z. Estrov,et al.  The use of nilotinib or dasatinib after failure to 2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors: long-term follow-up. , 2009, Blood.

[94]  M. Pirmohamed,et al.  Nilotinib concentration in cell lines and primary CD34+ chronic myeloid leukemia cells is not mediated by active uptake or efflux by major drug transporters , 2009, Leukemia.

[95]  Susan O'Brien,et al.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: chronic myelogenous leukemia. , 2009, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[96]  G. Szakács,et al.  Interaction of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib with ABCB1 and ABCG2: implications for altered anti‐cancer effects and pharmacological properties , 2009, British journal of pharmacology.

[97]  M. Deininger,et al.  Determining the rise in BCR-ABL RNA that optimally predicts a kinase domain mutation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia on imatinib. , 2009, Blood.

[98]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with P190 BCR-ABL: analysis of characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic significance. , 2009, Blood.

[99]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Philadelphia-positive patients who already harbor imatinib-resistant Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutations have a higher likelihood of developing additional mutations associated with resistance to second- or third-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2009, Blood.

[100]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Impact of baseline BCR-ABL mutations on response to nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[101]  N. Cross Standardisation of molecular monitoring for chronic myeloid leukaemia. , 2009, Best practice & research. Clinical haematology.

[102]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Dynamics and management of cytopenias associated with dasatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib failure , 2009, Cancer.

[103]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Significance of increasing levels of minimal residual disease in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in complete cytogenetic response. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[104]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced platelet dysfunction in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2009, Blood.

[105]  L. Staudt,et al.  Clinical Trials and Observations , 2007 .

[106]  K. Rezvani,et al.  Does a rise in the BCR‐ABL1 transcript level identify chronic phase CML patients responding to imatinib who have a high risk of cytogenetic relapse? , 2009, British journal of haematology.

[107]  A. Aleem Hypopigmentation of the skin due to imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2009, Hematology/oncology and stem cell therapy.

[108]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Imatinib mesylate dose escalation is associated with durable responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after cytogenetic failure on standard-dose imatinib therapy. , 2009 .

[109]  R. Larson,et al.  Efficacy of imatinib dose escalation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase , 2009, Cancer.

[110]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Characteristics and outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia patients with F317L BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation after therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2008, Blood.

[111]  B. Turcq,et al.  Evidence that resistance to nilotinib may be due to BCR-ABL, Pgp, or Src kinase overexpression. , 2008, Cancer research.

[112]  K. Rezvani,et al.  European LeukemiaNet criteria for failure or suboptimal response reliably identify patients with CML in early chronic phase treated with imatinib whose eventual outcome is poor. , 2008, Blood.

[113]  M. Pirmohamed,et al.  Effective dasatinib uptake may occur without human organic cation transporter 1 (hOCT1): implications for the treatment of imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2008, Blood.

[114]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Desirable performance characteristics for BCR-ABL measurement on an international reporting scale to allow consistent interpretation of individual patient response and comparison of response rates between clinical trials. , 2008, Blood.

[115]  D. Marin,et al.  Finding of kinase domain mutations in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia responding to imatinib may identify those at high risk of disease progression. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[116]  Jaspal Kaeda,et al.  Imatinib for newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: incidence of sustained responses in an intention-to-treat analysis. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[117]  J. Melo,et al.  Dasatinib Cellular Uptake and Efflux in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Cells: Therapeutic Implications , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[118]  Tillmann Krahnke,et al.  Imatinib pharmacokinetics and its correlation with response and safety in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a subanalysis of the IRIS study. , 2008, Blood.

[119]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Practical management of toxicities associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2008, Clinical lymphoma & myeloma.

[120]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Characteristics and outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and T315I mutation following failure of imatinib mesylate therapy. , 2007, Blood.

[121]  V. Meignin,et al.  Lung abnormalities after dasatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia: a case series. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[122]  B. Druker,et al.  A Half-Log Increase in BCR-ABL RNA Predicts a Higher Risk of Relapse in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with an Imatinib-Induced Complete Cytogenetic Response , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[123]  M. Baccarani,et al.  The prognosis for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who have clonal cytogenetic abnormalities in philadelphia chromosome‐negative cells , 2007, Cancer.

[124]  D. Colomer,et al.  Monosomy 7 with severe myelodysplasia developing during imatinib treatment of Philadelphia‐positive chronic myeloid leukemia: Two cases with a different outcome , 2007, American journal of hematology.

[125]  C. Preudhomme,et al.  Clinical outcome of 27 imatinib mesylate-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia patients harboring a T315I BCR-ABL mutation , 2007, Haematologica.

[126]  Nicholas Moore,et al.  Trough imatinib plasma levels are associated with both cytogenetic and molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2007, Blood.

[127]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Resistance to dasatinib in Philadelphia-positive leukemia patients and the presence or the selection of mutations at residues 315 and 317 in the BCR-ABL kinase domain. , 2007, Haematologica.

[128]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia chromosome negative metaphases appearing during imatinib mesylate therapy in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. , 2005, Blood.

[129]  P. Loehrer Altered Bone and Mineral Metabolism in Patients Receiving Imatinib Mesylate , 2007 .

[130]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Contribution of ABL Kinase Domain Mutations to Imatinib Resistance in Different Subsets of Philadelphia-Positive Patients: By the GIMEMA Working Party on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[131]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[132]  J. Goldman,et al.  Rationale for the recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia , 2006, Leukemia.

[133]  P. Manley,et al.  OCT-1-mediated influx is a key determinant of the intracellular uptake of imatinib but not nilotinib (AMN107): reduced OCT-1 activity is the cause of low in vitro sensitivity to imatinib. , 2006, Blood.

[134]  Simona Soverini,et al.  Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. , 2006, Blood.

[135]  J. Cayuela,et al.  Mutation status and clinical outcome of 89 imatinib mesylate-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia patients: a retrospective analysis from the French intergroup of CML (Fi(ϕ)-LMC GROUP) , 2006, Leukemia.

[136]  Hongyue Dai,et al.  Gene expression changes associated with progression and response in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[137]  A. Tefferi,et al.  Utility of peripheral blood dual color, double fusion fluorescent in situ hybridization for BCR/ABL fusion to assess cytogenetic remission status in chronic myeloid leukemia , 2006, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[138]  R. Clark,et al.  The role of serial BCR-ABL transcript monitoring in predicting the emergence of BCR-ABL kinase mutations in imatinib-treated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2006, Haematologica.

[139]  Munir Pirmohamed,et al.  Active transport of imatinib into and out of cells: implications for drug resistance. , 2004, Blood.

[140]  R. Herrmann,et al.  Real-time quantitative PCR analysis can be used as a primary screen to identify patients with CML treated with imatinib who have BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations. , 2004, Blood.

[141]  Laurie E Ailles,et al.  Granulocyte-macrophage progenitors as candidate leukemic stem cells in blast-crisis CML. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[142]  G. Flandrin,et al.  Report of 34 patients with clonal chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia-negative cells during imatinib treatment of Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia , 2004, Leukemia.

[143]  J. Abgrall,et al.  Interphase FISH for follow-up of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia treatment. , 2004, Anticancer research.

[144]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor (filgrastim) may overcome imatinib‐induced neutropenia in patients with chronic‐phase chronic myelogenous leukemia , 2004, Cancer.

[145]  A. Goh,et al.  Imatinib mesylate causes hypopigmentation in the skin , 2004, Cancer.

[146]  Yi-Ching Hsieh,et al.  Clonal evolution and lack of cytogenetic response are adverse prognostic factors for hematologic relapse of chronic phase CML patients treated with imatinib mesylate. , 2004, Blood.

[147]  V. Najfeld,et al.  The emergence of Ph-, trisomy -8+ cells in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib mesylate. , 2003, Experimental hematology.

[148]  Susan Branford,et al.  Detection of BCR-ABL mutations in patients with CML treated with imatinib is virtually always accompanied by clinical resistance, and mutations in the ATP phosphate-binding loop (P-loop) are associated with a poor prognosis. , 2003, Blood.

[149]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Prognostic significance of cytogenetic clonal evolution in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia on imatinib mesylate therapy. , 2003, Blood.

[150]  K. Krohn,et al.  Emergence of clonal cytogenetic abnormalities in Ph- cells in some CML patients in cytogenetic remission to imatinib but restoration of polyclonal hematopoiesis in the majority. , 2003, Blood.

[151]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Dose escalation of imatinib mesylate can overcome resistance to standard-dose therapy in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia. , 2003, Blood.

[152]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Quantitative polymerase chain reaction monitoring of BCR-ABL during therapy with imatinib mesylate (STI571; gleevec) in chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[153]  Z. Estrov,et al.  The biology of chronic myeloid leukemia. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[154]  C. Sawyers Chronic myeloid leukemia. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[155]  J. Melo,et al.  The presence of typical and atypical BCR-ABL fusion genes in leukocytes of normal individuals: biologic significance and implications for the assessment of minimal residual disease. , 1998, Blood.

[156]  J. Hasford,et al.  A new prognostic score for survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with interferon alfa. Writing Committee for the Collaborative CML Prognostic Factors Project Group. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[157]  A. Zinsmeister,et al.  Highly sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization method to detect double BCR/ABL fusion and monitor response to therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 1998, Blood.

[158]  G. Utermann,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on peripheral blood smears for monitoring Philadelphia chromosome‐positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) during interferon treatment: A new strategy for remission assessment , 1998, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[159]  G. Huez,et al.  Detection of major bcr-abl gene expression at a very low level in blood cells of some healthy individuals. , 1995, Blood.

[160]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Hypermetaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization for quantitative monitoring of Philadelphia chromosome-positive cells in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia during treatment. , 1995, Blood.

[161]  F. Mitelman The cytogenetic scenario of chronic myeloid leukemia. , 1993, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[162]  R. Berger Chromosome abnormalities in chronic myeloid leukemia , 1970 .

[163]  K. Krohn Transient benefit only from increasing the imatinib dose in CML patients who do not achieve complete cytogenetic remissions on conventional doses , 2022 .