From Fragments to Geometric Shape

Visual object recognition is foundational to processes of categorization, tool use, and real-world problem solving. Despite considerable effort across many disciplines and many specific advances, there is no comprehensive or well-accepted account of this ability. Moreover, none of the extant approaches consider how human object recognition develops. New evidence indicates a period of rapid change in toddlers' visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months that is related to the learning of object names and to goal-directed action. Children appear to shift from recognition based on piecemeal fragments to recognition based on geometric representations of three-dimensional shape. These findings may lead to a more unified understanding of the processes that make human object recognition as impressive as it is.

[1]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Object name learning and object perception: a deficit in late talkers , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[3]  P. Kellman.  Separating processes in object perception. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[5]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[6]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Shape and the first hundred nouns. , 2004, Child development.

[7]  S. Ullman.  Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Joan Stiles,et al.  The Fundamentals of Brain Development: Integrating Nature and Nurture , 2008 .

[9]  A. Woodward,et al.  New perspectives on the effects of action on perceptual and cognitive development. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[10]  Lisa M. Oakes,et al.  Early Category and Concept Development: Making Sense of the Blooming, Buzzing Confusion , 2008 .

[11]  C. Von Hofsten,et al.  Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences 34 Fitting Objects Into Holes On the Development of Spatial Cognition Skills , 2007 .

[12]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago? , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Shape: A Developmental Product , 2005, Functional Features in Language and Space.

[14]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Developmental changes in visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months of age. , 2009, Developmental science.

[15]  Peter Ulric Tse,et al.  Volume Completion , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Linda B. Smith.  Learning to Recognize Objects , 2003, Psychological science.

[17]  Linda B. Smith.  Action Alters Shape Categories , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  Richard G. Kurial,et al.  Representation and recognition , 1990 .

[19]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Seeing it differently: visual processing in autism , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  P. Bloom.  How children learn the meanings of words , 2000 .

[21]  A B Sekuler,et al.  Interactions between symmetry and elongation in determining reference frames for object perception. , 2000, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[22]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Visual object understanding , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Functional Features in Language and Space. , 2004 .

[24]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[25]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Systems in development: motor skill acquisition facilitates three-dimensional object completion. , 2010, Developmental psychology.

[26]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  ' s personal copy Simplicity and generalization : Short-cutting abstraction in children ’ s object categorizations , 1997 .