Prey approaching predators : a cost-benefit perspective

When faced with the presence of a predator, many species of prey initially approach rather than retreat from such a potential threat. Although seemingly paradoxical, this type of approach behaviour has been noted in a wide variety of taxa. We adopt a cost benefit perspective on the question of why prey approach potential predators, and aim to outline what is known about the putative costs and benefits of such behaviour. We identify five major types of costs associated with approach behaviour: (i) increased risk of mortality to the approacher, (ii) increased risk of mortality to relatives of the approacher, (iii) lost opportunity costs associated with approaching a predator, (iv) energetic costs of approach, and (v) potential costs of the approacher being 'exploited' by other group members. Benefits of approach behaviour are categorized as (i) acquiring information about the nature of the potential threat, (ii) informing others of the potential threat, (iii) deterring predator attack, and (iv) advertising one's quality to mates. After reviewing putative costs and benefits, we present a game theory model of prey approaching potential predators. Based on the costs and benefits of approach behaviour and group size, the model predicts the equilibrial frequency of 'approachers' and 'non approachers' and the (relative) mean approach distance (as a function of group size). To date, much of the work on prey approaching predators is either anecdotal or non experimental. We hope that the review of the costs and benefits of approaching predators presented here, in conjunction with our game theory model, will help provide direction for future studies of this interesting, but understudied, behavioural phenom

[1]  F. Walther,et al.  Flight Behaviour and Avoidance of Predators in Thomson's Gazelle (Gazella Thomsoni Guenther 1884) , 1969 .

[2]  Hans Kruuk,et al.  The Spotted Hyena: A Study of Predation and Social Behavior , 1972 .

[3]  F. Huntingford,et al.  The relationship between anti-predator behaviour and aggression among conspecifics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus Aculeatus , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  F. Huntingford A comparison of the reaction of sticklebacks in different reproductive conditions towards conspecifics and predators , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  R. J. Robertson,et al.  The function and evolution of aggressive host behavior towards the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) , 1977 .

[6]  Donald H. Owings,et al.  Snake Mobbing By California Ground Squirrels: Adaptive Variation and Ontogeny , 1977 .

[7]  S. R. Robinson Antipredator behaviour and predator recognition in Belding's ground squirrels , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  The Energetics of Feeding Territoriality in Juvenile Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus Kisutch) , 1985 .

[9]  Anne E. Magurran,et al.  Predator model recognition and response habituation in shoaling minnows , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  D. Brunton Fatal antipredator behavior of a Killdeer , 1986 .

[11]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  The Economics of Fleeing from Predators , 1986 .

[12]  Anne E. Magurran,et al.  Dicing with death: predator inspection behaviour in minnow shoals , 1986 .

[13]  C. Munn Birds that ‘cry wolf’ , 1986, Nature.

[14]  Anne E. Magurran,et al.  Provenance, shoal size and the sociobiology of predator-evasion behaviour in minnow shoals , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  D. Krebs,et al.  Sociobiology and psychology : ideas, issues, and applications , 1987 .

[16]  F. Huntingford,et al.  Paternal care and the development of adaptive variation in anti-predator responses in sticklebacks , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  M. Milinski TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation , 1987, Nature.

[18]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Risks and Rewards of Nest Defence by Parent Birds , 1988, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[19]  E. Curio,et al.  Two conflicting needs affecting predator mobbing by great tits, Parus major , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  T. Redondo Avian Nest Defence: Theoretical Models and Evidence , 1989 .

[21]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[22]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[23]  T. Sordahl The risks of avian mobbing and distraction behavior : an anecdotal review , 1990 .

[24]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  How Monkeys See the World , 1990 .

[25]  R. Hughes Behavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection , 1990, NATO ASI Series.

[26]  A. Magurran,et al.  Population differences in predator recognition and attack cone avoidance in the guppy Poecilia reticulata , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  A. Magurran,et al.  The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti-predator defense in fish , 1990 .

[28]  Richard G. Coss,et al.  Development of Antisnake Defenses in California Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus Beecheyi): I. Behavioral and Immunological Relationships , 1990 .

[29]  M. Nowak,et al.  Another battle of the sexes: the consequences of sexual asymmetry in mating costs and predation risk in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  J. Godin,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF A TRADE-OFF BETWEEN FORAGING AND BROOD DEFENSE ON PARENTAL BEHAVIOUR IN THE CONVICT CICHLID FISH, CICHLASOMA NIGROFASCIATUM , 1992 .