An evaluation of ß-turn prediction methods

MOTIVATION: beta-turn is an important element of protein structure. In the past three decades, numerous beta-turn prediction methods have been developed based on various strategies. For a detailed discussion about the importance of beta-turns and a systematic introduction of the existing prediction algorithms for beta-turns and their types, please see a recent review (Chou, Analytical Biochemistry, 286, 1-16, 2000). However at present, it is still difficult to say which method is better than the other. This is because of the fact that these methods were developed on different sets of data. Thus, it is important to evaluate the performance of beta-turn prediction methods. RESULTS: We have evaluated the performance of six methods of beta-turn prediction. All the methods have been tested on a set of 426 non-homologous protein chains. It has been observed that the performance of the neural network based method, BTPRED, is significantly better than the statistical methods. One of the reasons for its better performance is that it utilizes the predicted secondary structure information. We have also trained, tested and evaluated the performance of all methods except BTPRED and GORBTURN, on new data set using a 7-fold cross-validation technique. There is a significant improvement in performance of all the methods when secondary structure information is incorporated. Moreover, after incorporating secondary structure information, the Sequence Coupled Model has yielded better results in predicting beta-turns as compared with other methods. In this study, both threshold dependent and independent (ROC) measures have been used for evaluation.

[1]  J. Gibrat,et al.  Further developments of protein secondary structure prediction using information theory. New parameters and consideration of residue pairs. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROMOTIF—A program to identify and analyze structural motifs in proteins , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  Chun-Ting Zhang,et al.  Prediction of β‐turns in proteins by 1‐4 and 2‐3 correlation model , 1997 .

[4]  K C Chou,et al.  Prediction of tight turns and their types in proteins. , 2000, Analytical biochemistry.

[5]  K. Chou,et al.  Classification and Prediction of β-Turn Types , 1997, Journal of protein chemistry.

[6]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[7]  K. Chou,et al.  Prediction of β-turns , 2009 .

[8]  M Ouali,et al.  Cascaded multiple classifiers for secondary structure prediction , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  D Gorse,et al.  Prediction of the location and type of β‐turns in proteins using neural networks , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  J. Thornton,et al.  Analysis and prediction of the different types of β-turn in proteins , 1988 .

[11]  K. Takano,et al.  Role of amino acid residues at turns in the conformational stability and folding of human lysozyme. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[12]  Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al.  BetaTPred: prediction of beta-TURNS in a protein using statistical algorithms , 2002, Bioinform..

[13]  J. Thornton,et al.  Beta-turns and their distortions: a proposed new nomenclature. , 1990, Protein engineering.

[14]  B. Rost,et al.  Improved prediction of protein secondary structure by use of sequence profiles and neural networks. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  G. P. S. Raghava,et al.  BetaTPred : prediction of β-TURNS in a protein using statistical algorithms , 2002 .

[16]  K. Chou,et al.  Prediction of protein structural classes. , 1995, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[17]  J. Thornton,et al.  Analysis and prediction of the different types of beta-turn in proteins. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.