Knowledge conveyed in gesture is not tied to the hands.

Children frequently gesture when they explain what they know, and their gestures sometimes convey different information than their speech does. In this study, we investigate whether children's gestures convey knowledge that the children themselves can recognize in another context. We asked fourth-grade children to explain their solutions to a set of math problems and identified the solution procedures each child conveyed only in gesture (and not in speech) during the explanations. We then examined whether those procedures could be accessed by the same child on a rating task that did not involve gesture at all. Children rated solutions derived from procedures they conveyed uniquely in gesture higher than solutions derived from procedures they did not convey at all. Thus, gesture is indeed a vehicle through which children express their knowledge. The knowledge children express uniquely in gesture is accessible on other tasks, and in this sense, is not tied to the hands.

[1]  A. Karmiloff-Smith.  From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data , 1986, Cognition.

[2]  M. Alibali,et al.  Mechanisms of Transition: Learning with a Helping Hand , 1995 .

[3]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge , 1986, Cognition.

[4]  K. Crowley,et al.  Constraints On Learning in Nonprivileged Domains , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Denis Newman,et al.  Telling what they know: The role of gesture and language in children's science explanations , 1993 .

[6]  M. Alibali,et al.  Transitions in concept acquisition: using the hand to read the mind. , 1993, Psychological review.

[7]  M. Alibali,et al.  Do you have to be right to redescribe? , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  S Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Silence is liberating: removing the handcuffs on grammatical expression in the manual modality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[9]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[10]  A. Karmiloff-Smith.  Précis of Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  D. McNeill.  Hand and Mind , 1995 .

[12]  D. McNeill.  So you think gestures are nonverbal , 1985 .

[13]  D. Broadbent,et al.  On the Relationship between Task Performance and Associated Verbalizable Knowledge , 1984 .

[14]  Mary Ann Evans,et al.  Hand Gestures as a Communicative Mode in School-Aged Children , 1979 .

[15]  C. Acredolo,et al.  The Impact of Probability Judgments on Reasoning about Multiple Possibilities. , 1989 .

[16]  Curt Acredolo,et al.  On the Difficulty of Detecting Cognitive Uncertainty , 1991 .

[17]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[18]  A. Kendon.  Gesticulation and Speech: Two Aspects of the Process of Utterance , 1981 .

[19]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[20]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts , 1988 .

[21]  D. McNeill.  Psycholinguistics: A New Approach , 1987 .

[22]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Cognition Unawares. (Book Reviews: Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious.) , 1996 .

[23]  R. Mathews,et al.  Insight without Awareness: On the Interaction of Verbalization, Instruction and Practice in a Simulated Process Control Task , 1989 .

[24]  M. Alibali,et al.  Gesture-Speech Mismatch and Mechanisms of Learning: What the Hands Reveal about a Child′s State of Mind , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.