Modeling complex social contagions in big data era

In big data era, individuals are surrounded by various kinds of social medium, such as Facebook, Twitter and Microblog. These social media produce vast information every day and support diverse social contagions. However, the dynamics and mechanisms of these social contagions are still obscure and unrevealed because of the big data. In this paper, we propose a novel non-Markovian social contagion model to study behavior spreading under the environment of big data, in which a fraction of global individuals can transmit the behavior information to every susceptible individual, and the remaining local individuals can only transmit the behavior information to neighbors. Through extensive numerical simulations, we find that the global individuals markedly promote the behavior spreading and decrease the critical information transmission probability. In addition, we note that the degree heterogeneity of social network does not change the phenomena qualitatively. Our results may shed some lights in predicting and controlling social contagions. In further, the proposed model may be applied in real simulation platforms for emergency management in big data era.

[1]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[2]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Damon Centola An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior , 2011, Science.

[5]  Sergio Gómez,et al.  Competing spreading processes on multiplex networks: awareness and epidemics , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Dynamics of social contagions with heterogeneous adoption thresholds: crossover phenomena in phase transition , 2015, ArXiv.

[7]  Conrado J. Pérez Vicente,et al.  Diffusion dynamics on multiplex networks , 2012, Physical review letters.

[8]  Sergio Gómez,et al.  On the dynamical interplay between awareness and epidemic spreading in multiplex networks , 2013, Physical review letters.

[9]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Epidemic processes in complex networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[10]  Ming Tang,et al.  Asymmetrically interacting spreading dynamics on complex layered networks , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Paul Erdös,et al.  On random graphs, I , 1959 .

[12]  Wei Chen,et al.  Microtransition cascades to percolation. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[13]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[14]  Ming Tang,et al.  Dynamics of social contagions with limited contact capacity , 2015, Chaos.

[15]  Julia Poncela-Casasnovas,et al.  Adoption of a High-Impact Innovation in a Homogeneous Population. , 2014, Physical review. X.

[16]  Peter Sheridan Dodds,et al.  Universal behavior in a generalized model of contagion. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[17]  Gerardo Iñiguez,et al.  Complex contagion process in spreading of online innovation , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[18]  R. Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Generation of uncorrelated random scale-free networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Y. Moreno,et al.  Epidemic outbreaks in complex heterogeneous networks , 2001, cond-mat/0107267.

[20]  Ming Tang,et al.  Dynamics of social contagions with memory of non-redundant information , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Ming Tang,et al.  Numerical identification of epidemic thresholds for susceptible-infected-recovered model on finite-size networks , 2015, Chaos.