The rewards of restraint in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ant colonies

Collective behaviour, arising from local interactions, allows groups to respond to changing conditions. Long-term studies have shown that the traits of individual mammals and birds are associated with their reproductive success, but little is known about the evolutionary ecology of collective behaviour in natural populations. An ant colony operates without central control, regulating its activity through a network of local interactions. This work shows that variation among harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex barbatus) colonies in collective response to changing conditions is related to variation in colony lifetime reproductive success in the production of offspring colonies. Desiccation costs are high for harvester ants foraging in the desert. More successful colonies tend to forage less when conditions are dry, and show relatively stable foraging activity when conditions are more humid. Restraint from foraging does not compromise a colony’s long-term survival; colonies that fail to forage at all on many days survive as long, over the colony’s 20–30-year lifespan, as those that forage more regularly. Sensitivity to conditions in which to reduce foraging activity may be transmissible from parent to offspring colony. These results indicate that natural selection is shaping the collective behaviour that regulates foraging activity, and that the selection pressure, related to climate, may grow stronger if the current drought in their habitat persists.

[1]  D. Gordon,et al.  Worker longevity in harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex) , 1987 .

[2]  S. Pratt,et al.  A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  A. Pilko,et al.  Colony life history and lifetime reproductive success of red harvester ant colonies. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[4]  A. Gibbs,et al.  Effect of mating stage on water balance, cuticular hydrocarbons and metabolism in the desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus. , 2004, Journal of insect physiology.

[5]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests , 1996 .

[7]  D. Gordon The spatial scale of seed collection by harvester ants , 1993, Oecologia.

[8]  D. Gordon,et al.  The effect of neighbours on the mortality of harvester ant colonies , 1998 .

[9]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The development of an ant colony's foraging range , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Serban Nacu,et al.  How site fidelity leads to individual differences in the foraging activity of harvester ants , 2009 .

[11]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  How colony growth affects forager intrusion between neighboring harvester ant colonies , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  D. Gordon,et al.  Optimization, Conflict, and Nonoverlapping Foraging Ranges in Ants , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Ant Encounters: Interaction Networks and Colony Behavior , 2010 .

[14]  Denis Réale,et al.  Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  Allocation of liquid food to larvae via trophallaxis in colonies of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The short-term regulation of foraging in harvester ants , 2008 .

[17]  D. Davidson Some Consequences of Diffuse Competition in a Desert Ant Community , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Flexibility and the Foraging Ecology of Seed-Eating Ants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Adam Guetz,et al.  Colony variation in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ants. , 2011, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[20]  John R. B. Lighton,et al.  Water-Loss Rate and Cuticular Permeability in Foragers of the Desert Ant Pogonomyrmex rugosus , 1989, Physiological Zoology.

[21]  J. Lighton,et al.  Standard energy metabolism of a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex rugosus: Effects of temperature, body mass, group size, and humidity. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Balaji Prabhakar,et al.  The Regulation of Ant Colony Foraging Activity without Spatial Information , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Dany Garant,et al.  Evolution in a Changing Environment: A Case Study with Great Tit Fledging Mass , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[24]  D. Nussey,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[25]  K. Ingram,et al.  Differential regulation of the foraging gene associated with task behaviors in harvester ants , 2011, BMC Ecology.

[26]  S. Altmann,et al.  Diets of yearling female primates (Papio cynocephalus) predict lifetime fitness. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Exploring individual quality in a wild population of red deer. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.