Considerations in source-mask optimization for logic applications

In the low k1 regime, optical lithography can be extended further to its limits by advanced computational lithography technologies such as Source-Mask Optimization (SMO) without applying costly double patterning techniques. By cooptimizing the source and mask together and utilizing new capabilities of the advanced source and mask manufacturing, SMO promises to deliver the desired scaling with reasonable lithography performance. This paper analyzes the important considerations when applying the SMO approach to global source optimization in random logic applications. SMO needs to use realistic and practical cost functions and model the lithography process with accurate process data. Through the concept of source point impact factor (SPIF), this study shows how optimization outputs depend on SMO inputs, such as limiting patterns in the optimization. This paper also discusses the modeling requirements of lithography processes in SMO, and it shows how resist blur affect optimization solutions. Using a logic test case as example, the optimized pixelated source is compared with the non-optimized source and other optimized parametric sources in the verification. These results demonstrate the importance of these considerations during optimization in achieving the best possible SMO results which can be applied successfully to the targeted lithography process.

[1]  Wei Liu,et al.  SMO for 28-nm logic device and beyond: impact of source and mask complexity on lithography performance , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Oscar Noordman,et al.  Performance of FlexRay: a fully programmable illumination system for generation of freeform sources on high NA immersion systems , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Thomas Mülders,et al.  The role of mask topography effects in the optimization of pixelated sources , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Vladimir S. Pavelyev,et al.  Novel continuously shaped diffractive optical elements enable high efficiency beam shaping , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Robert Socha,et al.  Simultaneous source mask optimization (SMO) , 2005, Photomask Japan.

[6]  Jared D. Stack,et al.  Advances in DOE modeling and optical performance for SMO applications , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Oscar Noordman,et al.  Generation of arbitrary freeform source shapes using advanced illumination systems in high-NA immersion scanners , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Alan E. Rosenbluth,et al.  Optimum mask and source patterns to print a given shape , 2002 .

[9]  G. Vandenberghe,et al.  Freeform illumination sources: an experimental study of source-mask optimization for 22-nm SRAM cells , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Yunfei Deng,et al.  Optimization on illumination source with design of experiments , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Kafai Lai,et al.  Demonstrating the benefits of source-mask optimization and enabling technologies through experiment and simulations , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Ki-Ho Baik,et al.  Evaluation of lithographic benefits of using ILT techniques for 22nm-node , 2010, Advanced Lithography.