Tackling Leakage in a World of Unequal Carbon Prices Carbon pricing effects on cost structures and trade flows of energy intensive industries

Under the current EU ETS the competitiveness and leakage effects of a unilateral climate policy for industry with trade exposure have been under discussion. While leakage is of major concern to climate policy makers, industry and industrial policy makers pronounce competitive disadvantages from carbon pricing. Leakage effects are becoming increasingly relevant for the next unilateral climate policy steps in a number of countries. Among the nations and regions embarking on a stricter climate policy, including ETS, are Australia, New Zealand, and regions and provinces within the United States and Canada. Carbon pricing gives room for leakages, either by a shift of consumption of carbon-intensive goods towards cheaper import substitutes, entailing more CO2-intensive production in regions without carbon pricing, or by a (re)location of industrial production to areas without carbon pricing. In a world of unequal carbon prices more certainty for effective emission reduction is needed, especially when it comes to investment in sectors with carbon-intensive production. A commitment to a longer term ETS and other national measures thus needs to consider remedies against leakage.

[1]  Onno Kuik,et al.  Trade Liberalization and Carbon Leakage , 2003 .

[2]  E. Helpman R&D and Productivity: The International Connection , 1997 .

[3]  Bengt Johansson,et al.  Climate policy instruments and industry--effects and potential responses in the Swedish context , 2006 .

[4]  Ottar Mæstad,et al.  Climate Policy and the Steel Industry: Achieving Global Emission Reductions by an Incomplete Climate Agreement , 2004 .

[5]  David Popp,et al.  Induced Innovation and Energy Prices , 2001 .

[6]  Warwick J. McKibbin,et al.  Emissions trading, capital flows and the Kyoto protocol , 1999 .

[7]  A. Löschel,et al.  Climate Policy and the Problem of Competitiveness: Border Tax Adjustments or Integrated Emission Trading? , 2009 .

[8]  Frank Biermann,et al.  European emissions trading and the international competitiveness of energy-intensive industries: A legal and political evaluation of possible supporting measures , 2007 .

[9]  J. Burniaux,et al.  Carbon Emission Leakages: A General Equilibrium View , 2000 .

[10]  S. Zarrilli Domestic Taxation of Energy Products and Multilateral Trade Rules: Is This a Case of Unlawful Discrimination? , 2003, Journal of World Trade.

[11]  Onno Kuik,et al.  Carbon Leakage With International Technology Spillovers , 2007 .

[12]  M. Mehling,et al.  Dispelling the Chimera of `Self-Contained Regimes` International Law and the WTO , 2005 .

[13]  R. Tarasofsky Heating Up International Trade Law: Challenges and Opportunities Posed by Efforts to Combat Climate Change , 2008 .

[14]  Michael Hooker,et al.  Framing the Issues , 1992 .

[15]  Ottar Mæstad Allocation of emission permits with leakage through capital markets , 2007 .

[16]  A. Mattoo,et al.  Regulatory Autonomy and Multilateral Disciplines: The Dilemma and a Possible Resolution , 1998 .

[17]  M. Babiker Subglobal climate-change actions and carbon leakage: the implication of international capital flows , 2001 .

[18]  C. Kemfert,et al.  Trade Policy to Control Climate Change: Does the Stick Beat the Carrot? , 2005 .

[19]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation , 2006 .

[20]  M. Babiker Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage , 2005 .

[21]  H. Kimura Emerging Japanese Emissions Trading Schemes and prospects for linking , 2008 .

[22]  F. Biermann Between the USA and the South: strategic choices for European climate policy , 2005 .

[23]  Bert Saveyn,et al.  Towards a comprehensive climate change agreement in Copenhagen , 2009 .

[24]  G. Hufbauer,et al.  Fundamental tax reform and border tax adjustments , 1996 .

[25]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  International comparison of CO2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry , 2002 .

[26]  Julia Reinaud,et al.  SECTORAL APPROACHES TO GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION Exploring Issues for Heavy Industry , 2007 .

[27]  Gabrial Anandarajah,et al.  Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy , 2009 .

[28]  S. Charnovitz Trade Law and Global Governance , 2002 .

[29]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Development of an embedded carbon emissions indicator: Producing a time series of input-output tables and embedded carbon dioxide emissions for the UK by using a MRIO data optimisation system , 2008 .

[30]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives? , 1999 .

[31]  Xin Wang,et al.  Can Unilateral Trade Measures Significantly Reduce Leakage and Competitiveness Pressures on EU-ETS-Constrained Industries? The Case of China Export Taxes and VAT Rebates , 2009 .

[32]  Yeonbae Kima,et al.  International comparison of CO 2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry , 2002 .

[33]  Onno Kuik,et al.  Emissions trading and competitiveness: pros and cons of relative and absolute schemes , 2004 .

[34]  Ottar Mæstad On the Efficiency of Green Trade Policy , 1998 .

[35]  O. Kuik,et al.  The Kyoto Regime, Changing Patterns of International Trade and Carbon Leakage , 2002 .

[36]  Frank Biermann,et al.  Implementing the Kyoto Protocol without the USA: the strategic role of energy tax adjustments at the border , 2004 .

[37]  O. Kuik Climate change policies, international trade and carbon leakage , 2009 .

[38]  Karsten Neuhoff,et al.  The Role of Auctions for Emissions Trading , 2008 .

[39]  R. Howse,et al.  The product/process distinction - an illusory basis for disciplining 'unilateralism' in trade policy , 2000 .

[40]  O. Godard,et al.  Unilateral European Post-Kyoto climate policy and economic adjustment at EU borders 1 , 2007 .

[41]  Marco Düerkop Trade and Environment: International Trade Law Aspects of the Proposed EC Directive Introducing a tax on Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Energy , 1994, Common Market Law Review.

[42]  Bin Xu Trade , FDI , and International Technology Diffusion , .

[43]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change , 2008 .

[44]  P. Quirion,et al.  Leakage from climate policies and border tax adjustment:lessons from a geographic model of the cement industry , 2006 .

[45]  S. de Bruyn,et al.  Impacts on competitiveness from EU ETS : An analysis of the Dutch industry , 2008 .

[46]  ZhongXiang Zhang,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading and the World Trading System , 1998, Journal of World Trade.

[47]  Trevor Houser,et al.  Leveling the Carbon Playing Field: International Competition and US Climate Policy Design , 2008 .

[48]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  Global impacts of the Kyoto agreement: results from the MS-MRT model , 1999 .

[49]  F. Biermann,et al.  National climate change policies and WTO law: a case study of Germany's new policies , 2004, World Trade Review.

[50]  Ludivine Tamiotti,et al.  Trade and Climate Change: A report by the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Trade Organization , 2009 .

[51]  J. D. Cendra Can Emission Trading Schemes be Coupled with Border Tax Adjustments? An Analysis vis-à-vis WTO Law , 2006 .

[52]  K. Anderson Greening the GATT: Trade, environment, and the future , 1995 .

[53]  J. H. Jackson Comments on Shrimp/Turtle and the product/process distinction , 2000 .

[54]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  Border Tax Adjustments: A Feasible way to Support Stringent Emission Trading , 2007 .

[55]  Truong Truong,et al.  GTAP-E: An Energy-Environmental Version of the GTAP Model , 2002, GTAP Technical Paper Series.

[56]  The Triple Inefficiency of Uncoordinated Environmental Policies , 2005 .

[57]  Gavin Goh The World Trade Organization, Kyoto and Energy Tax Adjustments at the Border , 2004, Journal of World Trade.

[58]  G. Marceau Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and other Treaties , 2001, Journal of World Trade.

[59]  Aie,et al.  Tracking Industrial Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions , 2007 .

[60]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption , 2008 .

[61]  A. Baranzini,et al.  What Do We Know About Carbon Taxes? An Inquiry into Their Impacts on Competitiveness and Distribution of Income , 2003 .

[62]  J. Schleich,et al.  Economic and environmental effects of border tax adjustments , 2007 .

[63]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview , 2006 .

[64]  Doaa Abdel Motaal Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) and WTO Rules Why the “Burden of Accommodation” Should Shift to MEAs , 2001 .

[65]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[66]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  Changing the Allocation Rules in the EU ETS: Impact on Competitiveness and Economic Efficiency , 2008 .

[67]  Jhih-Shyang Shih,et al.  The near-term impacts of carbon mitigation policies on manufacturing industries , 2004 .

[68]  David Popp,et al.  The effect of new technology on energy consumption , 2001 .