Effects of the Isoform-specific Characteristics of ATF6α and ATF6β on Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response Gene Expression and Cell Viability*

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-transmembrane proteins, ATF6α and ATF6β, are cleaved during the ER stress response (ERSR). The resulting N-terminal fragments (N-ATF6α and N-ATF6β) have conserved DNA-binding domains and divergent transcriptional activation domains. N-ATF6α and N-ATF6β translocate to the nucleus, bind to specific regulatory elements, and influence expression of ERSR genes, such as glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), that contribute to resolving the ERSR, thus, enhancing cell viability. We previously showed that N-ATF6α is a rapidly degraded, strong transcriptional activator, whereas β is a slowly degraded, weak activator. In this study we explored the molecular basis and functional impact of these isoform-specific characteristics in HeLa cells. Mutants in the transcriptional activation domain or DNA-binding domain of N-ATF6α exhibited loss of function and increased expression, the latter of which suggested decreased rates of degradation. Fusing N-ATF6α to the mutant estrogen receptor generated N-ATF6α-MER, which, without tamoxifen exhibited loss-of-function and high expression, but in the presence of tamoxifen N-ATF6α-MER exhibited gain-of-function and low expression. N-ATF6β conferred loss-of-function and high expression to N-ATF6α, suggesting that ATF6β is an endogenous inhibitor of ATF6α. In vitro DNA binding experiments showed that recombinant N-ATF6β inhibited the binding of recombinant N-ATF6α to an ERSR element from the GRP78 promoter. Moreover, siRNA-mediated knock-down of endogenous ATF6β increased GRP78 promoter activity and GRP78 gene expression, as well as augmenting cell viability. Thus, the relative levels of ATF6α and -β, may contribute to regulating the strength and duration of ATF6-dependent ERSR gene induction and cell viability.

[1]  Hiderou Yoshida,et al.  ATF6 Activated by Proteolysis Binds in the Presence of NF-Y (CBF) Directly to the cis-Acting Element Responsible for the Mammalian Unfolded Protein Response , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[2]  S. Triezenberg,et al.  Pattern of aromatic and hydrophobic amino acids critical for one of two subdomains of the VP16 transcriptional activator. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R. Deshaies,et al.  A putative stimulatory role for activator turnover in gene expression , 2005, Nature.

[4]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[5]  X. Chen,et al.  ER stress induces cleavage of membrane-bound ATF6 by the same proteases that process SREBPs. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[6]  R. Deshaies,et al.  Diverse roles for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis in transcriptional activation , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[7]  Mark A Sussman,et al.  Hypoxic Cultured Cardiac Myocytes Activation of the Unfolded Protein Response in Infarcted Mouse Heart , 2006 .

[8]  H. Hoover,et al.  Coordination of ATF6-mediated Transcription and ATF6 Degradation by a Domain That Is Shared with the Viral Transcription Factor, VP16* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  M. Gething,et al.  SCFCdc4-mediated degradation of the Hac1p transcription factor regulates the unfolded protein response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[10]  M. Gilman,et al.  Proteasome‐mediated degradation of transcriptional activators correlates with activation domain potency in vivo , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[11]  Eric D. Spear,et al.  The Unfolded Protein Response: No Longer Just a Special Teams Player , 2001, Traffic.

[12]  G. Evan,et al.  A modified oestrogen receptor ligand-binding domain as an improved switch for the regulation of heterologous proteins. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[14]  Elmer S. West From the U. S. A. , 1965 .

[15]  R. Hay,et al.  Regulation of transcription factors by protein degradation , 2000, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[16]  R. Prywes,et al.  p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Mediates the Transcriptional Induction of the Atrial Natriuretic Factor Gene through a Serum Response Element , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  S. Johnston,et al.  Alterations in the GAL4 DNA-binding Domain Can Affect Transcriptional Activation Independent of DNA Binding* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  D. Picard,et al.  Steroid-binding domains for regulating the functions of heterologous proteins in cis. , 1993, Trends in cell biology.

[19]  K. Mori,et al.  Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Induced Formation of Transcription Factor Complex ERSF Including NF-Y (CBF) and Activating Transcription Factors 6α and 6β That Activates the Mammalian Unfolded Protein Response , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[20]  Hiderou Yoshida,et al.  pXBP1(U) encoded in XBP1 pre-mRNA negatively regulates unfolded protein response activator pXBP1(S) in mammalian ER stress response , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  K. Mori,et al.  Mammalian transcription factor ATF6 is synthesized as a transmembrane protein and activated by proteolysis in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  R. Prywes,et al.  Interaction of ATF6 and serum response factor , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[23]  K. Mori,et al.  Identification of the G13 (cAMP-response-element-binding protein-related protein) gene product related to activating transcription factor 6 as a transcriptional activator of the mammalian unfolded protein response , 2001 .

[24]  D. Thuerauf,et al.  Opposing Roles for ATF6α and ATF6β in Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response Gene Induction* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  W. Tansey,et al.  The proteasome: a utility tool for transcription? , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[26]  R. Kaufman,et al.  Activation of ATF6 and an ATF6 DNA binding site by the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. , 2000, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[27]  R. Kaufman,et al.  The unfolded protein response , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[28]  Hiderou Yoshida,et al.  Identification of the cis-Acting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response Element Responsible for Transcriptional Induction of Mammalian Glucose-regulated Proteins , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  S. Rogers,et al.  Amino acid sequences common to rapidly degraded proteins: the PEST hypothesis. , 1986, Science.

[30]  A. Roy,et al.  Identification of TFII-I as the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response Element Binding Factor ERSF: Its Autoregulation by Stress and Interaction with ATF6 , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[31]  M. Muratani,et al.  How the ubiquitin–proteasome system controls transcription , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  A. S. Lee,et al.  The mammalian endoplasmic reticulum stress response element consists of an evolutionarily conserved tripartite structure and interacts with a novel stress-inducible complex. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Modulation of promoter occupancy by cooperative DNA binding and activation-domain function is a major determinant of transcriptional regulation by activators in vivo. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Mingqing Li,et al.  ATF6 as a Transcription Activator of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Element: Thapsigargin Stress-Induced Changes and Synergistic Interactions with NF-Y and YY1 , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.