A SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TEST OF PERSONAL INITIATIVE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO PERFORMANCE

Although situational judgment tests have been found to be valid predictors of performance, they have rarely been used to measure particular constructs. In this study, we apply the situational judgment test method to the measurement of personal initiative, a construct defined as situated action. We used respondents' situated preferences in mental simulations of work scenarios as formative indicators of their overall level of personal initiative at work. Results from a validation study showed that the situational judgment test of personal initiative (SJT-PI) had adequate validity and complemented a Likert-type self-report measure of personal initiative in predicting behavioral criteria. Situated preferences for personal initiative were hypothesized to be proximal predictors of actual behavior and were accordingly found to mediate the relationship between generalized self-efficacy, felt responsibility, and actual behavior. Furthermore, situated preferences for personal initiative could be differentiated empirically from organizational citizenship behavior. We conclude that situational judgment tests are a promising method for measuring personal initiative and may be a general means of improving the validity of measurement in organizations.

[1]  J. Wilcox,et al.  Reconsidering formative measurement. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[2]  G. Rae.  A note on using stratified alpha to estimate the composite reliability of a test composed of interrelated nonhomogeneous items. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[3]  S. Parker,et al.  A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts , 2007 .

[4]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Integrating Implicit and Explicit Social Cognitions for Enhanced Personality Assessment , 2007 .

[5]  M. Frese,et al.  Scenario-based scales measuring cultural orientations of business owners , 2007 .

[6]  S. J. Motowidlo,et al.  Implicit policies about relations between personality traits and behavioral effectiveness in situational judgment items. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Nick Turner,et al.  Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Michael Frese,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation: A psychological model of success among southern African small business owners , 2005 .

[9]  G. W. Maier,et al.  Implicit and self-attributed motives to achieve: two separate but interacting needs. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  M. Bolino,et al.  The personal costs of citizenship behavior: the relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  F. Lievens,et al.  Situational Judgment Tests and their Predictiveness of College Students’ Success: The Influence of Faking , 2005 .

[13]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Situational Judgment: Antecedents and Relationships with Performance , 2005 .

[14]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Walter Mischel,et al.  Toward an integrative science of the person. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Be Careful What You Ask For: Effects of Response Instructions on the Construct Validity and Reliability of Situational Judgment Tests , 2003 .

[17]  W. Hacker.  Action Regulation Theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? , 2003 .

[18]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  Estimating Interrater Agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A User’s Guide , 2002 .

[19]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  N. Nguyen,et al.  Situational Judgment Tests: A Review of Practice and Constructs Assessed , 2001 .

[21]  Michael Frese,et al.  The Concept of Personal Initiative: An Overview of Validity Studies , 2001 .

[22]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Perspectives on Models of Job Performance , 2000 .

[23]  Charles E. Lance,et al.  Assessment Center Exercise Factors Represent Cross-Situational Specificity, Not Method Bias , 2000 .

[24]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[25]  J. Crant,et al.  Proactive Behavior in Organizations , 2000 .

[26]  Michael Frese,et al.  Helping to improve suggestion systems: predictors of making suggestions in companies , 1999 .

[27]  E. Morrison,et al.  Taking Charge At Work: Extrarole Efforts to Initiate Workplace Change , 1999 .

[28]  P. Gollwitzer.  Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[29]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Multidimensional Constructs M Structural Equation Analysis: An Illustration Using the Job Perception and Job Satisfaction Constructs , 1999 .

[30]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  On Average Deviation Indices for Estimating Interrater Agreement , 1999 .

[31]  L. V. Dyne,et al.  Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity , 1998 .

[32]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions. , 1997 .

[33]  Michael Frese,et al.  The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples , 1997 .

[34]  Michael Frese,et al.  Generalized Self Efficacy As a Mediator and Moderator Between Control and Complexity at Work and Personal Initiative: A Longitudinal Field Study in East Germany , 1997 .

[35]  D. Organ.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up Time , 1997 .

[36]  A. Costall,et al.  Situating Action I: Truth in the Situation , 1996 .

[37]  B. Nardi.  Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition , 1995 .

[38]  G. Latham,et al.  Criterion-related validity of the situational and patterned behavior description interviews with organizational citizenship behavior. , 1995 .

[39]  S. J. Motowidlo,et al.  Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. , 1994 .

[40]  Lyle M. Spencer,et al.  Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance , 1993 .

[41]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates , 1993 .

[42]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory of self-regulation☆ , 1991 .

[43]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. , 1990 .

[44]  Philip M. Podsakoff,et al.  Accounting for Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Leader Fairness and Task Scope versus Satisfaction , 1990 .

[45]  Dennis W. Organ,et al.  COGNITIVE VERSUS AFFECTIVE DETERMINANTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR , 1989 .

[46]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[47]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Do people do what they say? Further studies on the situational interview. , 1984 .

[48]  K. Bollen.  Multiple indicators: Internal consistency or no necessary relationship? , 1984 .

[49]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[50]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation , 1982 .

[51]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[52]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[53]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  E. S. Conklin.  Human Motivation , 1932, The Journal of Religion.

[55]  Mohammad Muzahid Akbar,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR: ITS NATURE AND ANTECEDENTS , 2004 .

[56]  D. Borsboom,et al.  The Theoretical Status of Latent Variables , 2003 .

[57]  M. Frese,et al.  PERSONAL INITIATIVE : AN ACTIVE PERFORMANCE CONCEPT FOR WORK IN THE 21 st CENTURY , 2002 .

[58]  M. Frese,et al.  4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century , 2001 .

[59]  Michael Frese,et al.  Sociodemographic factors, entrepreneurial orientation, personal initiative, and environmental problems in Uganda. , 2000 .

[60]  W. Mischel,et al.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. , 1995, Psychological review.

[61]  M. Frese,et al.  Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. , 1994 .

[62]  W. D. Spangler.  Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. , 1992 .

[63]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[64]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .