Hydroacoustic surveys: a non-destructive approach to monitoring fish distributions at National Marine Sanctuaries

The science of fisheries acoustics and its applicability to resource management have evolved over the past several decades. This document provides a basic description of fisheries acoustics and recommendations on using this technology for research and monitoring of fish distributions and habitats within sanctuaries. It also describes recent efforts aimed at applying fisheries acoustics to Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary (GRNMS) (Figure 1). Historically, methods to assess the underwater environment have included net trawls, diver censuses, hook and line, video, sonar and other techniques deployed in a variety of ways. Fisheries acoustics, using active sonar, relies on the physics of sound traveling through water to quantify the distribution of biota in the water column. By sending a signal of a given frequency through the water column and recording the time of travel and the strength of the reflected signal, it is possible to determine the size and location of fish and estimate biomass from the acoustic backscatter. As a fisheries assessment tool, active hydroacoustics technology is an efficient, non-intrusive method of mapping the water column at a very fine spatial and temporal resolution. It provides a practical alternative to bottom and mid-water trawls, which are not allowed at GRNMS. Passive acoustics, which uses underwater hydrophones to record man-made and natural sounds such as fish spawning calls and sounds produced by marine mammals for communication and echolocation, can provide a useful, complementary survey tool. This report primarily deals with active acoustics, although the integration of active and passive acoustics is addressed as well. (PDF contains 32 pages)

[1]  C. Clay,et al.  Sonar systems and aquatic organisms: matching equipment and model parameters , 1998 .

[2]  O. Jensen,et al.  Benthic Habitats of Gray ’ s Reef National Marine Sanctuary NOAA National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science , 2003 .

[3]  Donna Z. Mirkes,et al.  Advanced concepts in ocean measurements for marine biology , 1980 .

[4]  J. Jech,et al.  Three-dimensional visualization of fish morphometry and acoustic backscatter , 2002 .

[5]  M. Kendall,et al.  Benthic Mapping Using Sonar, Video Transects, and an Innovative Approach to Accuracy Assessment: A Characterization of Bottom Features in the Georgia Bight , 2005 .

[6]  J. Bohnsack,et al.  Length-weight relationships of selected marine reef fishes from the southeastern United States and the Caribbean , 1988 .

[7]  David G. Reid Report on Echo Trace Classification , 2000 .

[8]  Egil Ona,et al.  Physiological factors causing natural variations in acoustic target strength of fish , 1990, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[9]  E. Knut,et al.  Paris Meeting of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea , 1923, Nature.

[10]  Rudy J. Kloser,et al.  Acoustic assessment of the biomass of a spawning aggregation of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus, Collett) off south-eastern Australia, 1990-93 , 1996 .

[11]  Tuomo Rossi,et al.  Simulation and experimental measurement of side-aspect target strength of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) at high frequency , 2004 .

[12]  K. Iida,et al.  Target strength estimation of black porgy Acanthopagrus schlegeli using acoustic measurements and a scattering model , 2004 .

[13]  K.,et al.  NOT TO BE CITED WITHOUT PRIOR REFERENCE TO THE AUTHORS International Council for the Exploration of the Sea , 2003 .

[14]  G. Rose Monitoring coastal northern cod: towards an optimal survey of Smith Sound, Newfoundland , 2003 .

[15]  Richard,et al.  MEASUREMENTS OF FISH TARGET STRENGTH : A REVIEW , 2022 .

[16]  O. Nakken,et al.  Target strength measurements of fish , 1977 .

[17]  K. Foote Importance of the swimbladder in acoustic scattering by fish: A comparison of gadoid and mackerel target strengths , 1980 .

[18]  D. Ridley,et al.  Cape Town, South Africa , 1986, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[19]  K. Foote Fish target strengths for use in echo integrator surveys , 1987 .

[20]  K. Foote,et al.  Comparison of walleye pollock target strength estimates determined from in situ measurements and calculations based on swimbladder form , 1988 .

[21]  C. Clay,et al.  Acoustical Oceanography : Principles and Applications , 1977 .

[22]  John K. Horne,et al.  Acoustic models of fish: The Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) , 1994 .

[23]  E. John Simmonds,et al.  Fisheries Acoustics , 1992, Fish & Fisheries Series.

[24]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  A consistent approach to definitions and symbols in fisheries acoustics , 2002 .