Government.com? Multifunctional cabinet portfolio analysis of 201 national governments

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine how much value national governments worldwide place on political, economic, scientific, artistic, religious, legal, sportive, health-related, educational and mass media-related issues. This knowledge is critical as governments and policies are typically expected to be congruent with the importance these issues have for society. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on theories of polyphonic and multifunctional organization, the authors recoded and analyzed a US Central Intelligence Agency directory to test the cabinet portfolio of a total of 201 national governments for significant biases to the above issues. Findings The results suggest that governments worldwide massively over-allocate their attention to economic issues. Originality/value The authors conclude that this strong pro-economic governance-bias likely translates into dysfunctional governance and development at both the national and supra-national level.

[1]  S. A. González.  Public Management in Transition: The Orchestration of Potentiality , 2018 .

[2]  Steffen Roth.  Heal the World. A Solution-Focused Systems Therapy Approach to Environmental Problems , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[3]  Katrin Scharfenkamp.  The effects of bridging business and politics – A survival analysis of German Federal ministers , 2018, European Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  N. Luhmann.  The Paradox of Decision-Making , 2018, Organization and Decision.

[5]  N. Luhmann.  Organization and Decision , 2018 .

[6]  Matthias G. Will,et al.  Stakeholder Theory: A Luhmannian Perspective , 2018, Administration & Society.

[7]  G. Svensson,et al.  Organizational positioning and planning of sustainability initiatives , 2018, International Journal of Public Sector Management.

[8]  V. Valentinov,et al.  Was that capitalism? A future-oriented big data analysis of the English language area in the 19th and 20th century , 2018 .

[9]  Anders Esmark.  Limits to Liberal Government: An Alternative History of Governmentality , 2018 .

[10]  Matthias G. Will,et al.  From Nonprofit Diversity to Organizational Multifunctionality: A Systems–Theoretical Proposal , 2017 .

[11]  V. Valentinov,et al.  The neglect of society in the theory of the firm: a systems-theory perspective , 2017 .

[12]  J. G. Pors,et al.  On the history of the form of administrative decisions: how decisions begin to desire uncertainty , 2017 .

[13]  Steffen Roth,et al.  Futures of a Distributed Memory. A Global Brain Wave Measurement (1800-2000) , 2017 .

[14]  J. Kaivo-oja,et al.  Multiplying the Division of Labour: Functional Differentiation of the Next Key Variables in Management Research , 2017 .

[15]  Anders la Cour,et al.  Polyphonic Supervision: Meta-governance in Denmark , 2017 .

[16]  Steffen Roth.  Marginal Economy: Growth Strategies for Post-Growth Societies , 2016 .

[17]  Frédérique Pallez,et al.  A public strategy under construction? Coordination and performance in territorial innovation systems , 2016 .

[18]  T. Pegram,et al.  Wanted: A Third Generation of Global Governance Research , 2015 .

[19]  J. G. Pors,et al.  Playful organisations: Undecidability as a scarce resource , 2015 .

[20]  V. Valentinov.  Value Devolution in Social Enterprises , 2015 .

[21]  A. Peña.  Governing differentiation: On standardisation as political steering , 2015 .

[22]  R. Beunen,et al.  Formal/Informal Dialectics and the Self-Transformation of Spatial Planning Systems , 2014 .

[23]  Alexandra Collm,et al.  Strategies for Introducing Organizational Innovation to Public Service Organizations , 2014 .

[24]  Thomas Hale,et al.  Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation is Failing when We Need It Most , 2013 .

[25]  Dennis Schoeneborn,et al.  When Birds of Different Feather Flock Together , 2013 .

[26]  R. Beunen,et al.  PERFORMING SUCCESS AND FAILURE IN GOVERNANCE: DUTCH PLANNING EXPERIENCES , 2012 .

[27]  Ralf Wetzel,et al.  Eighteen Shades of Grey? An Explorative Literature Review into the Theoretical Flavours of Organizational Change Research , 2012 .

[28]  Steffen Blaschke,et al.  Organizations as Networks of Communication Episodes: Turning the Network Perspective Inside Out , 2012 .

[29]  D. Held,et al.  Editors' introduction: mapping change in transnational governance , 2011 .

[30]  Dennis Schoeneborn,et al.  Organization as Communication , 2011 .

[31]  M. Knudsen.  Surprised by Method—Functional Method and Systems Theory , 2010 .

[32]  O. Belova.  Polyphony and the sense of self in flexible organizations , 2010 .

[33]  Maria C. Escobar-Lemmon,et al.  Getting to the Top , 2009 .

[34]  Anders Esmark.  THE FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIATION OF GOVERNANCE: PUBLIC GOVERNANCE BEYOND HIERARCHY, MARKET AND NETWORKS , 2009 .

[35]  T. Weiss.  What Happened to the Idea of World Government , 2009 .

[36]  Gert Verschraegen,et al.  The Limits of Planning: Niklas Luhmann's Systems Theory and the Analysis of Planning and Planning Ambitions , 2008 .

[37]  Timothy Kuhn,et al.  A Communicative Theory of the Firm: Developing an Alternative Perspective on Intra-organizational Power and Stakeholder Relationships , 2008 .

[38]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Managing the Polyphonic Sounds of Organizational Truths , 2008 .

[39]  W. Scheuerman.  Review Essay: Global Governance without Global Government? Habermas on Postnational Democracy , 2008 .

[40]  James N. Druckman,et al.  Measuring portfolio salience in Eastern European parliamentary democracies , 2007 .

[41]  T. Hernes,et al.  Organization as process: Drawing a line between endogenous and exogenous views , 2007 .

[42]  J. Habermas.  A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society , 2007 .

[43]  B. Rennison.  Cash, codes and complexity: New adventures in the public management of pay scales , 2007 .

[44]  Torun Dewan,et al.  The Length of Ministerial Tenure in the United Kingdom, 1945–97 , 2007, British Journal of Political Science.

[45]  P. Pattberg,et al.  Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics , 2006 .

[46]  Mandar P. Oak,et al.  Coalition Governments in a Model of Parliamentary Democracy , 2006 .

[47]  S. Clegg,et al.  Rethinking the polyphonic organization: Managing as discursive practice , 2006 .

[48]  M. Hazen.  Silences, perinatal loss, and polyphony , 2006 .

[49]  Simon Calmar Andersen,et al.  How to Improve the Outcome of State Welfare Services. Governance in A Systems-Theoretical Perspective , 2005 .

[50]  Armin Nassehi,et al.  Organizations as Decision Machines: Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Organized Social Systems , 2005 .

[51]  B. Peters,et al.  The study of organisational autonomy: a conceptual review , 2004 .

[52]  Tor Hernes,et al.  Implications of Self-Reference: Niklas Luhmann’s Autopoiesis and Organization Theory , 2003 .

[53]  Panagiotis Karkatsoulis.  The Social Context of a ‘Value-For-Money’-Based Administrative Reform , 2000 .

[54]  N. Andersen,et al.  Complexity and Change: Two "Semantic Tricks" in the Triumphant Oscillating Organization , 2000 .

[55]  M. Castells.  End of Millennium: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1997 .

[56]  Andrew Dunsire,et al.  Tipping the Balance , 1996 .

[57]  D. Heater.  World Citizenship and Government: Cosmopolitan Ideas in the History of Western Political Thought , 1996 .

[58]  M. Hazen.  Multiplicity and Change in Persons and Organizations , 1994 .

[59]  Mary Ann Hazen,et al.  Towards Polyphonic Organization , 1993 .

[60]  D. Hoaglin,et al.  Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling , 1987 .

[61]  J. Tukey,et al.  Performance of Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling , 1986 .

[62]  T. Rice.  An Examination of the Median Voter Hypothesis , 1985 .

[63]  A. Downs.  An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy , 1957, Journal of Political Economy.

[64]  W. Arnold-Forster.  Towards World Government , 1949 .

[65]  Philip Selznick.  Foundations of the Theory of Organization , 1948 .

[66]  M. Knudsen.  Conditions for critical performativity in a polycontextural society , 2017 .

[67]  V. Valentinov.  Methodological and Ideological Options K . William Kapp ' s theory of social costs : A Luhmannian interpretation , 2016 .

[68]  M. Knudsen,et al.  Systems Theory and the Sociology of Health and Illness : Observing Healthcare , 2015 .

[69]  M. Knudsen.  Personal Leadership in Polyphonic Organisations , 2015 .

[70]  Dries Lesage,et al.  Rising powers and multilateral institutions , 2015 .

[71]  Vladislav Valentinov,et al.  The Complexity–Sustainability Trade‐Off in Niklas Luhmann's Social Systems Theory , 2014 .

[72]  Földrajz,et al.  Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose * , 2011 .

[73]  N. Andersen,et al.  Heterophony and the Postponed Organization Organizing autopoietic systems , 2007 .

[74]  N. Thygesen,et al.  The polyphonic effects of technological changes in public sector organizations , 2007 .

[75]  David Seidl,et al.  Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies , 2005 .

[76]  James N. Druckman,et al.  The missing piece: Measuring portfolio salience in Western European parliamentary democracies , 2005 .

[77]  T. Hernes,et al.  Autopoietic organization theory : drawing on Niklas Luhmann's social systems perspective , 2003 .

[78]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Die Politik der Gesellschaft , 2002 .

[79]  M. Brans,et al.  The autopoiesis of administrative systems: Niklas Luhmann on public administration and public policy , 1997 .

[80]  M. Laver.  The relationship between coalition policy and party policy , 1985 .

[81]  N. Luhmann,et al.  Differentiation of society , 1977 .