Shifts in caterpillar biomass phenology due to climate change and its impact on the breeding biology of an insectivorous bird

Timing of reproduction has major fitness consequences, which can only be understood when the phenology of the food for the offspring is quantified. For insectivorous birds, like great tits (Parus major), synchronisation of their offspring needs and abundance of caterpillars is the main selection pressure. We measured caterpillar biomass over a 20-year period and showed that the annual peak date is correlated with temperatures from 8 March to 17 May. Laying dates also correlate with temperatures, but over an earlier period (16 March – 20 April). However, as we would predict from a reliable cue used by birds to time their reproduction, also the food peak correlates with these temperatures. Moreover, the slopes of the phenology of the birds and caterpillar biomass, when regressed against the temperatures in this earlier period, do not differ. The major difference is that due to climate change, the relationship between the timing of the food peak and the temperatures over the 16 March – 20 April period is changing, while this is not so for great tit laying dates. As a consequence, the synchrony between offspring needs and the caterpillar biomass has been disrupted in the recent warm decades. This may have severe consequences as we show that both the number of fledglings as well as their fledging weight is affected by this synchrony. We use the descriptive models for both the caterpillar biomass peak as for the great tit laying dates to predict shifts in caterpillar and bird phenology 2005–2100, using an IPCC climate scenario. The birds will start breeding earlier and this advancement is predicted to be at the same rate as the advancement of the food peak, and hence they will not reduce the amount of the current mistiming of about 10 days.

[1]  J. Kiesecker,et al.  Amphibian Breeding and Climate Change: Reply to Corn , 2003 .

[2]  C. Both,et al.  Global Climate Change Leads to Mistimed Avian Reproduction , 2004 .

[3]  A. J. Noordwijk,et al.  Selection for the timing of great tit breeding in relation to caterpillar growth and temperature , 1995 .

[4]  C. Parmesan,et al.  Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming , 1999, Nature.

[5]  J. V. Balen,et al.  A Comparative Sudy of the Breeding Ecology of the Great Tit Parus major in Different Habitats , 2015 .

[6]  Erik Postma,et al.  Selection on Heritable Phenotypic Plasticity in a Wild Bird Population , 2005, Science.

[7]  J. Tinbergen,et al.  Parental energy expenditure during brood rearing in the Great Tit (Parus major) in relation to body mass, temperature, food availability and clutch size , 1994 .

[8]  H. Klomp,et al.  The Determination of Clutch-Size in Birds a Review , 2015 .

[9]  S. Verhulst,et al.  Seasonal Decline in Reproductive Success of the Great Tit: Variation in Time or Quality? , 1995 .

[10]  B. Naef-Daenzer,et al.  Prey selection and foraging performance of breeding Great Tits Parus major in relation to food availability , 2000 .

[11]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Techniques for Estimating the Density of Late-Instar Gypsy Moth, Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), Populations Using Frass Drop and Frass Production Measurements , 1988 .

[12]  C. Both,et al.  The effect of climate change on the correlation between avian life‐history traits , 2005 .

[13]  M. Visser,et al.  Seasonal variation in local recruitment of great tits: the importance of being early , 1998 .

[14]  M. Esch.  ECHAM4_OPYC_SRES_B2: 110 YEARS COUPLED B2 RUN 6H VALUES , 2002 .

[15]  J. Blondel,et al.  Breeding time, food supply and fitness components of Blue Tits Parus caeruleus in Mediterranean habitats , 1996 .

[16]  J R Speakman,et al.  Energetic and Fitness Costs of Mismatching Resource Supply and Demand in Seasonally Breeding Birds , 2001, Science.

[17]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Changed plant and animal life cycles from 1952 to 2000 in the Mediterranean region , 2002 .

[18]  Marcel E. Visser,et al.  Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  J. Brown,et al.  Long-term trend toward earlier breeding in an American bird: a response to global warming? , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Trophic interactions under climate fluctuations: the Atlantic puffin as an example , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Sabine G. Henrich-Gebhardt.  Temporal and Spatial Variation in Food Availability and its Effects on Fledgling Size in the Great Tit , 1990 .

[22]  T. E. Martin.  Food as a limit on breeding birds: a life-history perspective , 1987 .

[23]  S. Daan,et al.  Family Planning in the Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus): The Ultimate Control of Covariation of Laying Date and Clutch Size , 1990 .

[24]  Marcel E Visser,et al.  Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[26]  David L. Thomson,et al.  Variable responses to large-scale climate change in European Parus populations , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Arie J van Noordwijk,et al.  Evidence for the Effect of Learning on Timing of Reproduction in Blue Tits , 2002, Science.

[28]  Marcel E. Visser,et al.  Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  J. Pearce‐Higgins,et al.  Habitat selection, diet, arthropod availability and growth of a moorland wader: the ecology of European Golden Plover Pluvialis apricaria chicks , 2004 .

[30]  David L. Thomson,et al.  UK birds are laying eggs earlier , 1997, Nature.

[31]  Lia Hemerik,et al.  A new statistical tool to predict phenology under climate change scenarios , 2005 .

[32]  H. Zandt.  A comparison of three sampling techniques to estimate the population size of caterpillars in trees , 1994, Oecologia.

[33]  B. Naef-Daenzer,et al.  ESTIMATING CATERPILLAR DENSITY ON TREES BY COLLECTION OF FRASS DROPPINGS , 1998 .

[34]  A. J. Noordwijk,et al.  Effects of local environmental conditions on nestling growth in the great tit Parus major L. , 1994 .

[35]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Estimating the Density of Larval Gypsy Moth, Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), Using Frass Drop and Frass Production Measurements: Sources of Variation and Sample Size , 1988 .

[36]  S. Verhulst,et al.  Food, reproductive success and multiple breeding in the Great Tit Parus major , 2001 .