Assessing socially disruptive technological change

The co-evolution of society and potentially disruptive technologies makes decision guidance on such technologies difficult. Four basic principles are proposed for such decision guidance. None of th ...

[1]  W. Huss,et al.  Scenario planning—What style should you use? , 1987 .

[2]  H. Kahn,et al.  The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years, , 1967 .

[3]  G Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. , 2004, Environment international.

[4]  M. Karlström,et al.  Positive and negative feedback in consequential life-cycle assessment , 2007 .

[5]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[6]  E. Anders Eriksson,et al.  Scenario-Based Methodologies for Strategy Development and Management of Change , 2004 .

[7]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Public advice on the development of nanobiotechnology : Final report of four european convergence seminars , 2007 .

[8]  Mattias Höjer,et al.  Determinism and backcasting in futures studies , 2000 .

[9]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[10]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide , 2006 .

[11]  Ilkka Tuomi,et al.  Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet , 2002 .

[12]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  An Approach to Vulnerability Analysis of Complex Industrial Systems , 1998 .

[13]  John Robinson.  Energy backcasting A proposed method of policy analysis , 1982 .

[14]  Gill Ringland,et al.  Scenario Planning: Managing for the Future , 1998 .

[15]  K. Dreborg.  Essence of backcasting , 1996 .

[16]  Sven Ove Hansson.  ECONOMIC (IR)RATIONALITY IN RISK ANALYSIS , 2006, Economics and Philosophy.

[17]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  THE FALSE PROMISES OF RISK ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[18]  J. Schummer.  “Societal and Ethical Implications of Nanotechnology”: Meanings, Interest Groups, and Social Dynamics , 2004 .

[19]  Oliver Todt.  Risk in perspective , 2001 .

[20]  Günter Ropohl,et al.  Ethik und Technikbewertung , 1996 .

[21]  Lutz E. Schlange.  Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[22]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[23]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[24]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Methodologies for social life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[25]  George Burt,et al.  Why are we surprised at surprises? Integrating disruption theory and system analysis with scenario methodology to help identify surprises, disruptions and discontinuities , 2007 .

[26]  Michael Nentwich,et al.  EUROpTA: European Participatory Technology Assessment - Participatory Methods in Technology Assessment and Technology Decision-Making , 2000 .

[27]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[28]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Defining technical function , 2006 .

[29]  O. H. Bray,et al.  Fundamentals of technology roadmapping , 1997 .

[30]  Joseph P. Martino,et al.  A review of selected recent advances in technological forecasting , 2003 .

[31]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[32]  G. Heyman.  On "The Science of Substance Abuse" , 1998, Science.

[33]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[34]  George Wright,et al.  The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning , 2005 .

[35]  Mats-Olov Olsson,et al.  Systems Approaches and Their Application: Examples from Sweden , 2006 .