Towards Interoperability Between Functional Taxonomies Using An Ontology-Based Mapping

A functional model of an artifact shows an important part of designer’s intention. A taxonomy of generic functions plays a crucial role in describing such functional models. Improving interoperability among functional models of different functional taxonomies facilitates sharing functional models among designers in organizations. The mapping between the different functional taxonomies and the conversion of functional models based on this mapping are one of the ways to support such interoperability. Among the different functional taxonomies, however, there are not only terminological differences but also ontological differences implicitly. By ontological differences we mean the conceptual differences between taxonomies and the general structural differences between models. In this article, firstly we propose a framework for mapping between functional taxonomies using a reference ontology of function in order to bridge the conceptual differences. The reference ontology contributes to specify the ontological differences between the functional taxonomies. Second, in order to reduce the structural differences between the functional models, we discuss how to capture the modeling world. These results enable us to convert the functional models among different taxonomies. As examples of the functional taxonomies, we focus on the reconciled functional basis proposed by Hirtz et al. and our functional concept ontology based on Function & Behavior Representation Language.

[1]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Functional representation as design rationale , 1993, Computer.

[2]  Jan L. Top,et al.  Engineering ontologies , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Some Organizing Principles For A Unified Top-Level Ontology 1 , 1997 .

[4]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Development of a Functional Basis for Design , 2000 .

[5]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Special Issue: Engineering applications of representations of function, Part 2 , 2005, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[6]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  Designing a representation to support function; means based synthesis of mechanical design solutions , 2001 .

[7]  Giovanni Guida,et al.  Functional and teleological knowledge in the multimodeling approach for reasoning about physical systems: a case study in diagnosis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  William C. Regli,et al.  Functional Modeling of Engineering Designs for the Semantic Web , 2003, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[9]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[10]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  Improved Function-means Trees by Inclusion of Design History Information , 1997 .

[11]  Ken M. Wallace,et al.  A Methodology for Creating Ontologies for Engineering Design , 2007, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[12]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  PACT: an experiment in integrating concurrent engineering systems , 1993, Computer.

[13]  David C. Anderson,et al.  Ontology-based Design Knowledge Modeling for Product Retrieval , 2005 .

[14]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  An Ontology-Based Annotation Framework for Representing the Functionality of Engineering Devices , 2006 .

[15]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  A functional concept ontology and its application to automatic identification of functional structures , 2002, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[16]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Reasoning about function and its applications to engineering , 1998, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[17]  John S. Gero,et al.  The Situated Function - Behaviour - Structure Framework , 2002, AID.

[18]  Simon Szykman,et al.  A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts , 2002 .

[19]  Parisa Ghodous,et al.  Product Data Exchange Using Ontologies , 2002, AID.

[20]  Hideaki Takeda,et al.  Physical concept ontology for the knowledge intensive engineering framework , 2004, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[21]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Functional Reasoning in Design , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[22]  Pawel Garbacz,et al.  Towards a standard taxonomy of artifact functions , 2006, Appl. Ontology.

[23]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  An ontological model of device function: industrial deployment and lessons learned , 2006, Appl. Ontology.

[24]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  Towards Ontologies of Functionality and Semantic Annotation for Technical Knowledge Management , 2006, JSAI Workshops.

[25]  Michael A. Rosenman,et al.  Purpose and function in design: from the socio-cultural to the techno-physical , 1998 .

[26]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Special Issue: Engineering applications of representations of function, Part 1 , 2005, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[27]  B. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Function in Device Representation , 2000, Engineering with Computers.

[28]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  The Representation of Function in Computer-Based Design , 1999 .

[29]  Mitsuru Ikeda,et al.  FBRL: A Function and Behavior Representation Language , 1995, IJCAI.

[30]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  Towards a Reference Ontology for Functional Knowledge Interoperability , 2007, DAC 2007.

[31]  Natalya F. Noy,et al.  Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches , 2004, SGMD.

[32]  Crispin Hales,et al.  Engineering design: a systematic approach , 1989 .

[33]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  Ontology-based Transformation from an Extended Functional Model to FMEA , 2005 .

[34]  Lawrence D. Miles,et al.  Techniques Of Value Analysis And Engineering , 1961 .

[35]  York Sure-Vetter,et al.  Ontology-Based Information Integration in the Automotive Industry , 2003, SEMWEB.

[36]  Vladimir Hubka,et al.  Theory of Technical Systems , 1988 .

[37]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler , 1996, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[38]  Morten Lind,et al.  Modeling goals and functions of complex industrial plants , 1994, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[39]  P. M. Wognum,et al.  Introduction to TIPS: a theory for creative design , 1995, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[40]  Peter Denno,et al.  An analysis and approach to using existing ontological systems for applications in manufacturing , 2000, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.