Breaking concept boundaries to enhance creative potential: Using integrated concept maps for conceptual self-awareness

The authors address the role of computer support for building conceptual self-awareness-that is, enabling students to think outside of concept boundaries in hope of enhancing creative potential. Based on meta-cognition theory, we developed an integrated concept mapping system (ICMSys) to improve users' conceptual self-awareness in addition to applying concept mapping techniques in traditional learning scenarios. Since the ICMSys accommodates different perspectives, selected ideas made by peers are retained with the help of integrated concept map (ICMap) representations used as stimuli for reflective thinking. Results from a case study with 32 information management undergraduates indicate: (a) increased levels of conceptual self-awareness, (b) evidence of conceptual improvement in the students' redrawn concept maps, (c) that ICMap viewing frequency exerted a positive impact on level of conceptual self-awareness, and (d) a significant correlation between level of conceptual self-awareness in redrawn personal concept maps and actual conceptual changes as determined by three experts. We describe student perceptions of the ICMSys in terms of comprehension practicality and conceptual self-awareness, and give suggestions for future research.

[1]  Winslow Burleson,et al.  Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  H. Gardner.  Creating minds: an anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of freud , 1993 .

[3]  Chun-Chieh Huang,et al.  The evaluation and influence of interaction in network supported collaborative concept mapping , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[4]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[5]  C. Ford.  A Theory of Individual Creative Action in Multiple Social Domains , 1996 .

[6]  L. Resnick.  The Nature of Intelligence , 2024 .

[7]  Masanori Sugimoto,et al.  Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  F. Weinert,et al.  Metacognition, motivation, and understanding , 1987 .

[9]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[10]  S. Duval,et al.  A theory of objective self awareness , 1972 .

[11]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[12]  K. Fisher.  Semantic Networking: The New Kid on the Block , 1990 .

[13]  Ted Selker.  Fostering motivation and creativity for computer users , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  Nick Hammond,et al.  Computer-based tools to support learning from hypertext: concept mapping tools and beyond , 1994 .

[15]  John W. Coffey.  A meta-cognitive tool for courseware development, maintenance, and reuse , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[16]  A. Brown.  Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms , 1987 .

[17]  J. Flavell.  Metacognitive aspects of problem solving , 1976 .

[18]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[19]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social comparison in the social and physical sciences: An archival study. , 1983 .

[20]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  The Social Construction of Scientific Concepts or the Concept Map as Device and Tool Thinking in High Conscription for Social School Science , 1992 .

[21]  Gloria Gomez,et al.  CmapTools: A Knowledge Modeling and Sharing Environment , 2004 .

[22]  J. Mintzes,et al.  The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology , 1990 .

[23]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Concept maps as hypermedia components , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  Nicolas Michinov,et al.  Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  Rob Kremer.  Toward a multi-user, programmable web concept mapping "shell" to handle multiple formalisms , 1996 .

[26]  E. Salas,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. , 1991 .

[27]  Kyparisia A. Papanikolaou,et al.  Using WordNet to support interactive concept map construction , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings..

[28]  Olugbemiro J. Jegede,et al.  Cognitive preference and learning mode as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping , 1988 .

[29]  J. Malone,et al.  The Concept Map as an Aid to Instruction in Science and Mathematics , 1984 .

[30]  John F. Feldhusen,et al.  Creativity: A Knowledge Base, Metacognitive Skills, and Personality Factors , 1995 .

[31]  Katia Passerini,et al.  A developmental model for distance learning using the Internet , 2000 .

[32]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  The Social Construction of Scientific Concepts or the Concept Map as Conscription Device and Tool for Social Thinking in High School Science. , 1992 .

[33]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Web-based collaborative inquiry learning , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[34]  Gregory K. W. K. Chung,et al.  Use of Networked Collaborative Concept Mapping To Measure Team Processes and Team Outcomes , 1997 .

[35]  P. Alexander,et al.  Metacognition: Answered and Unanswered Questions , 1989 .

[36]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  Designing a networked-sharing construction environment , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[37]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1996 .

[38]  James Stevenson,et al.  The New Kid on the Block , 1989 .