Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis Tools to Two Contaminated Sediment Case Studies

Abstract Environmental decision making is becoming increasingly more information intensive and complex. Our previous work shows that multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) tools offer a scientifically sound decision analytical framework for environmental management, in general, and specifically for selecting optimal sediment management alternatives. Integration of MCDA into risk assessment and sediment management may require linkage of different models and software platforms whose results may lead to somewhat different conclusions. This paper illustrates the application of 3 different MCDA methods in 2 case studies involving contaminated sediment management. These case studies are based on real sediment management problems experienced by the US Army Corps of Engineers and other stakeholders in New York/New Jersey Harbor, USA, and the Cocheco River Superfund Site in New Hampshire, USA. Our analysis shows that application of 3 different MCDA tools points to similar management solutions no matter which tool is applied. MCDA tools and approaches were constructively used to elicit the strengths and weaknesses of each method when solving the problem.

[1]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[2]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems , 1998 .

[3]  S French,et al.  Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding , 1996 .

[4]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[5]  Igor Linkov,et al.  MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS: A FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGING CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS , 2005 .

[6]  David W. Moore,et al.  A Comparative Screening-Level Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment for Dredged Material Management Alternatives in New York/New Jersey Harbor , 2002 .

[7]  F. H. Barron,et al.  SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 1994 .

[8]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[9]  E Ferguson,et al.  From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. , 2006, Environment international.

[10]  Aregai Tecle,et al.  SELECTING A MULTICRITERION DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUE FOR WATERSHED RESOURCES MANAGEMENT , 1992 .

[11]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD , 1985 .

[12]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[13]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Strategic Management of Marine Ecosystems , 2005 .

[14]  I. Linkov,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Comprehensive Decision Approach for Management of Contaminated Sediments , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  Combining Expert Judgement and Stakeholder Values with Promethee: A case Study in Contaminated Sediments , 2004 .

[16]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[17]  David J. Weiss,et al.  SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 2008 .

[18]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Comparative risk assessment and environmental decision making , 2005 .

[19]  Todd S. Bridges,et al.  Integrating Comparative Risk Assessment with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Manage Contaminated Sediments: An Example for the New York/New Jersey Harbor , 2008 .

[20]  Rodney Parrish,et al.  Welcome to IEAM , 2005 .

[21]  N J Themelis,et al.  A basin-wide approach to dredged material management in New York/New Jersey Harbor. , 2001, Journal of hazardous materials.

[22]  T. Seager,et al.  Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making , 2005, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[23]  J. Dyer.  Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .