A Wavelet-based Seismogram Inversion Algorithm for the In Situ Characterization of Nonlinear Soil Behavior

We present a full waveform inversion algorithm of downhole array seismogram recordings that can be used to estimate the inelastic soil behavior in situ during earthquake ground motion. For this purpose, we first develop a new hysteretic scheme that improves upon existing nonlinear site response models by allowing adjustment of the width and length of the hysteresis loop for a relatively small number of soil parameters. The constitutive law is formulated to approximate the response of saturated cohesive materials, and does not account for volumetric changes due to shear leading to pore pressure development and potential liquefaction. We implement the soil model in the forward operator of the inversion, and evaluate the constitutive parameters that maximize the cross-correlation between site response predictions and observations on ground surface. The objective function is defined in the wavelet domain, which allows equal weight to be assigned across all frequency bands of the non-stationary signal. We evaluate the convergence rate and robustness of the proposed scheme for noise-free and noise-contaminated data, and illustrate good performance of the inversion for signal-to-noise ratios as low as 3. We finally employ the proposed scheme to downhole array data, and show that results compare very well with published data on generic soil conditions and previous geotechnical investigation studies at the array site. By assuming a realistic hysteretic model and estimating the constitutive soil parameters, the proposed inversion accounts for the instantaneous adjustment of soil response to the level and strain and load path during transient loading, and allows results to be used in predictions of nonlinear site effects during future events.

[1]  Arthur Frankel,et al.  Site response for urban Los Angeles using aftershocks of the Northridge earthquake , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  Michael W. Asten,et al.  Comparisons of shear-wave slowness in the Santa Clara Valley, California using blind interpretations of data from invasive and noninvasive methods , 2008 .

[3]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Nonlinear multiparameter optimization using genetic algorithms; inversion of plane-wave seismograms , 1991 .

[4]  Ahmed-W. Elgamal,et al.  Analysis of Site Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading Using Centrifuge Testing Records , 1996 .

[5]  Ahmed Elgamal,et al.  Identification and modeling of earthquake ground response — I. Site amplification , 1996 .

[6]  J. Bardet,et al.  Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999 reconnaissance report , 2000 .

[7]  Mehmet Baris Darendeli,et al.  Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves , 2001 .

[8]  Grigori Muravskii,et al.  On description of hysteretic behaviour of materials , 2005 .

[9]  S. Elachachi,et al.  An identification procedure of soil profile characteristics from two free field acclerometer records , 2005 .

[10]  Mladen Vucetic,et al.  DEGRADATION OF MARINE CLAYS UNDER CYCLIC LOADING , 1988 .

[11]  G W Housner,et al.  COMPETING AGAINST TIME: REPORT TO GOVERNOR GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN , 1990 .

[12]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Determining the initial states in forward-backward filtering , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  M. Korn,et al.  Incorporation of attenuation into time-domain computations of seismic wave fields , 1987 .

[14]  Jamison H. Steidl,et al.  Attenuation and Velocity Structure for Site Response Analyses via Downhole Seismogram Inversion , 2006 .

[15]  Jean-Michel Renders,et al.  Hybridizing genetic algorithms with hill-climbing methods for global optimization: two possible ways , 1994, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence.

[16]  Wilfred D. Iwan,et al.  On a Class of Models for the Yielding Behavior of Continuous and Composite Systems , 1967 .

[17]  David M. Boore,et al.  Comparison of Phase Velocities from Array Measurements of Rayleigh Waves Associated with Microtremor and Results Calculated from Borehole Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles , 2000 .

[18]  Mourad Zeghal,et al.  Identification and modeling of earthquake ground response — II. Site liquefaction , 1996 .

[19]  Olga V. Pavlenko,et al.  Estimation of Nonlinear Time-dependent Soil Behavior in Strong Ground Motion Based on Vertical Array Data , 2003 .

[20]  P. M. Berg,et al.  Iterative forward and inverse algorithms based on domain integral equations for three-dimensional electric and magnetic objects , 2004 .

[21]  地盤工学会 Special issue on geotechnical aspects of the January 17 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake , 1996 .

[22]  Chin Man Mok,et al.  Inference of Dynamic Shear Modulus from Lotung Downhole Data , 1996 .

[23]  Wei Li,et al.  Site Amplification and Attenuation via Downhole Array Seismogram Inversion: A Comparative Study of the 2003 Miyagi-Oki Aftershock Sequence , 2008 .

[24]  William T. Holmes,et al.  The 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures , 2000 .

[25]  Christopher R. Houck,et al.  Comparison of genetic algorithms, random restart and two-opt switching for solving large location-allocation problems , 1996, Comput. Oper. Res..

[26]  X. Li,et al.  Pore Pressure Response During 1986 Lotung Earthquakes , 1991 .

[27]  Kuo-Liang Wen,et al.  Estimation of Nonlinear Soil Behavior During the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2008 .

[28]  C. M. Mok,et al.  Analysis of ground response data at Lotung large-scale soil- structure interaction experiment site , 1991 .

[29]  Ahmed Elgamal,et al.  LOTUNG DOWNHOLE ARRAY. I: EVALUATION OF SITE DYNAMIC PROPERTIES , 1995 .

[30]  Aria Abubakar,et al.  A robust iterative method for Born inversion , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Pengcheng Liu,et al.  Efficient Modeling of Q for 3D Numerical Simulation of Wave Propagation , 2006 .

[32]  Guy Bonnet,et al.  Nonlinear Viscoelastic Wave Propagation: An Extension of Nearly Constant Attenuation Models , 2009 .

[33]  Rachel E. Abercrombie,et al.  Earthquake source scaling relationships from −1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at 2.5‐km depth , 1995 .

[34]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  A novel framework integrating downhole array data and site response analysis to extract dynamic soil behavior , 2008 .

[35]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  1D TIME-DOMAIN SOLUTION FOR SEISMIC GROUND MOTION PREDICTION , 2001 .

[36]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  System identification estimation of soil properties at the Lotung site , 2000 .

[37]  Kojiro Irikura,et al.  Nonlinear Behavior of Soils Revealed from the Records of the 2000 Tottori, Japan, Earthquake at Stations of the Digital Strong-Motion Network Kik-Net , 2006 .

[38]  Don L. Anderson,et al.  Velocity dispersion due to anelasticity; implications for seismology and mantle composition , 1976 .

[39]  K. Irikura,et al.  Identification of the non-linear behaviour of liquefied and non-liquefied soils during the 1995 Kobe earthquake , 2005 .

[40]  Ahmed Elgamal,et al.  Lotung Downhole Array. II: Evaluation of Soil Nonlinear Properties , 1995 .

[41]  Ahmed Elgamal,et al.  Dynamic Soil Properties, Seismic Downhole Arrays and Applications in Practice , 2001 .

[42]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Use of Exact Solutions of Wave Propagation Problems to Guide Implementation of Nonlinear Seismic Ground Response Analysis Procedures , 2007 .

[43]  Jamison H. Steidl,et al.  Quantifying Nonlinearity Susceptibility via Site-Response Modeling Uncertainty at Three Sites in the Los Angeles Basin , 2008 .

[44]  O. Pavlenko,et al.  Nonlinear Seismic Effects in Soils: Numerical Simulation and Study , 2001 .

[45]  Semih S. Tezcan,et al.  A reconnaissance report for the Romanian earthquake of 4 March 1977 , 1978 .

[46]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  System Identification and its Application to Estimating Soil Properties , 1995 .

[47]  Mladen Vucetic,et al.  Generalized Cyclic-Degradation-Pore-Pressure Generation Model for Clays , 1995 .

[48]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes , 1975 .

[49]  Ronnie Kosloff,et al.  Wave propagation simulation in a linear viscoacoustic medium , 1988 .

[50]  G. Masing,et al.  Eigenspannungen und Verfestigung beim Messing , 1926 .

[51]  T. Hout,et al.  Competing Against Time , 1990 .

[52]  J. Bernard Minster,et al.  Numerical simulation of attenuated wavefields using a Padé approximant method , 1984 .

[53]  P. M. Berg,et al.  The diagonalized contrast source approach: an inversion method beyond the Born approximation , 2005 .

[54]  Jamison H. Steidl,et al.  Inverse analysis of weak and strong motion downhole array data from the Mw7.0 Sanriku-Minami earthquake , 2007 .