Investigation of Prediction Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Parameter Stability of Large-Scale Propagation Path Loss Models for 5G Wireless Communications

This paper compares three candidate large-scale propagation path loss models for use over the entire microwave and millimeter-wave (mmWave) radio spectrum: the alpha-beta-gamma (ABG) model, the close-in (CI) free-space reference distance model, and the CI model with a frequency-weighted path loss exponent (CIF). Each of these models has been recently studied for use in standards bodies such as 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) and for use in the design of fifth-generation wireless systems in urban macrocell, urban microcell, and indoor office and shopping mall scenarios. Here, we compare the accuracy and sensitivity of these models using measured data from 30 propagation measurement data sets from 2 to 73 GHz over distances ranging from 4 to 1238 m. A series of sensitivity analyses of the three models shows that the four-parameter ABG model underpredicts path loss when relatively close to the transmitter, and overpredicts path loss far from the transmitter, and that the physically based two-parameter CI model and three-parameter CIF model offer computational simplicity, have very similar goodness of fit (i.e., the shadow fading standard deviation), exhibit more stable model parameter behavior across frequencies and distances, and yield smaller prediction error in sensitivity tests across distances and frequencies, when compared to the four-parameter ABG model. Results show the CI model with a 1-m reference distance is suitable for outdoor environments, while the CIF model is more appropriate for indoor modeling. The CI and CIF models are easily implemented in existing 3GPP models by making a very subtle modification - by replacing a floating non-physically based constant with a frequency-dependent constant that represents free-space path loss in the first meter of propagation. This paper shows this subtle change does not change the mathematical form of existing ITU/3GPP models and offers much easier analysis, intuitive appeal, better model parameter stability, and better accuracy in sensitivity tests over a vast range of microwave and mmWave frequencies, scenarios, and distances, while using a simpler model with fewer parameters.

[1]  E. Violette,et al.  Millimeter-wave propagation at street level in an urban environment , 1988 .

[2]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Indoor Office Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models at 28 and 73 GHz for Ultra-Dense 5G Wireless Networks , 2015, IEEE Access.

[3]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter-Wave Omnidirectional Path Loss Data for Small Cell 5G Channel Modeling , 2015, IEEE Access.

[4]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Propagation measurements and models for wireless communications channels , 1995, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[5]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Local multipath model parameters for generating 5G millimeter-wave 3GPP-like channel impulse response , 2015, 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[6]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models for Future Wireless Communication System Design , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[7]  Luis M. Correia,et al.  Characterisation of propagation in 60 GHz radio channels (invited) , 2004 .

[8]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice (2nd Edition) by , 2012 .

[9]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter Wave Channel Modeling and Cellular Capacity Evaluation , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[10]  Lassi Hentila,et al.  WINNER II Channel Models , 2009 .

[11]  M. Salazar-Palma,et al.  Further validation of an electromagnetic macro model for analysis of propagation path loss in cellular networks using measured drive test data , 2014, 2014 IEEE-APS Topical Conference on Antennas and Propagation in Wireless Communications (APWC).

[12]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  3-D Millimeter-Wave Statistical Channel Model for 5G Wireless System Design , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[13]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Broadband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Models Using Adaptive-Beam Antennas for Outdoor Urban Cellular Communications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[14]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  What Will 5G Be? , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[15]  Yi Wang,et al.  Indoor 5G 3GPP-like channel models for office and shopping mall environments , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[16]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Probabilistic Omnidirectional Path Loss Models for Millimeter-Wave Outdoor Communications , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[17]  Jose Luis Garcia,et al.  Ultra wideband channel model for indoor environments , 2003, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[18]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter-Wave Enhanced Local Area Systems: A High-Data-Rate Approach for Future Wireless Networks , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[19]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  A Prediction Study of Path Loss Models from 2-73.5 GHz in an Urban-Macro Environment , 2015, 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[20]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Five disruptive technology directions for 5G , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[21]  M. Salazar-Palma,et al.  Further Validation of an Electromagnetic Macro Model for Analysis of Propagation Path Loss in Cellular Networks Using Measured Driving-Test Data , 2014, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[22]  Huan Nguyen,et al.  Path Loss, Shadow Fading, and Line-of-Sight Probability Models for 5G Urban Macro-Cellular Scenarios , 2015, 2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[23]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Path loss models for 5G millimeter wave propagation channels in urban microcells , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[24]  A. Lozano,et al.  What Will 5 G Be ? , 2014 .

[25]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Coverage and Rate Analysis for Millimeter-Wave Cellular Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[26]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Mimo for millimeter-wave wireless communications: beamforming, spatial multiplexing, or both? , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[27]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter-Wave Cellular Wireless Networks: Potentials and Challenges , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  Dajana Cassioli,et al.  Millimeter waves channel measurements and path loss models , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[29]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Omnidirectional path loss models in New York City at 28 GHz and 73 GHz , 2014, 2014 IEEE 25th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communication (PIMRC).

[30]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter-wave distance-dependent large-scale propagation measurements and path loss models for outdoor and indoor 5G systems , 2015, 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[31]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter-Wave 60 GHz Outdoor and Vehicle AOA Propagation Measurements Using a Broadband Channel Sounder , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[32]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Propagation Path Loss Models for 5G Urban Micro- and Macro-Cellular Scenarios , 2015, 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[33]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work! , 2013, IEEE Access.

[34]  Kyungwhoon Cheun,et al.  Millimeter-wave beamforming as an enabling technology for 5G cellular communications: theoretical feasibility and prototype results , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[35]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  An Empirical Study of Urban Macro Propagation at 10, 18 and 28 GHz , 2016, 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[36]  M. Hata,et al.  Empirical formula for propagation loss in land mobile radio services , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[37]  Yeon-Jea Cho,et al.  Synchronous channel sounder using horn antenna and indoor measurements on 28 GHz , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking (BlackSeaCom).

[38]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications , 2014 .

[39]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  73 GHz millimeter wave propagation measurements for outdoor urban mobile and backhaul communications in New York City , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[40]  Yi Wang,et al.  5G 3GPP-Like Channel Models for Outdoor Urban Microcellular and Macrocellular Environments , 2016, 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[41]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  38 GHz and 60 GHz angle-dependent propagation for cellular & peer-to-peer wireless communications , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[42]  P. Vainikainen,et al.  Experimental Propagation Channel Characterization of mm-Wave Radio Links in Urban Scenarios , 2012, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[43]  Geir Løvnes,et al.  Channel sounding measurements at 59 GHz in city streets , 1994, 5th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Wireless Networks - Catching the Mobile Future..

[44]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  28 GHz and 73 GHz millimeter-wave indoor propagation measurements and path loss models , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW).

[45]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[46]  Yoshihisa Kishiyama,et al.  Experimental mm wave 5G cellular system , 2014, 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).