An improved discrete system model for form error control in surface grinding

Abstract Grinding remains as one of few choices being able to machine very hard materials to deliver ultra high precision at high material removal rate for efficiency. Effective models are needed for precision control of the machining process. So far, few studies on form error prediction have been reported. Machining usually begins with partial removal of workpiece surface. Without in-process sensing, system parameters could not be accurately determined nor surface form information thus preventing us from modeling for precision control. In this study, an improved discrete system model and an in-process sensing technique have been proposed to address the partial removal and precision control problems. Models for partial removal, full removal, and sparking out conditions have been established. Form error assessment in the partial removal stage has been investigated. It is found that the grinding constant is able to reflect changes in machining conditions and is able to represent machining capability. A larger grinding constant will mean a reduced size reduction. Further studies of the grinding constant are necessary. For the accurate estimation of the grinding constant, two approaches are proposed. The iterative approach was found more suitable and convergent. The proposed models and in-process sensing technique were validated through experimental testing in terms of workpiece surface form profile yn(x,z0), average size reduction cn, surface form error Epvn and normal grinding force Fnn. Through detailed examination and comparative studies, the proposed models and in-process sensing technique offered significant improvements ranging from approximately 16.9% to 23%, compared with the existing models. Except the grinding force, which was indirectly measured through a voltage measurement approach, the overall relative errors between the theoretical results and the experimental results under full removal conditions were found ranged from 2.08% to 6.87%, indicating the improved precision prediction capabilities of the proposed system model. The experimental results can be used as a set of references for further studies to offer performance assessment, precision prediction, process planning, and process condition monitoring for this important precision machining process.

[1]  Nong Zhang,et al.  Dynamic model of the grinding process , 2005 .

[2]  Steven Y. Liang,et al.  Feed rate optimization and depth of cut control for productivity and part parallelism in grinding , 1999 .

[3]  Yongsheng Gao,et al.  A discrete system model for form error control in surface grinding , 2010 .

[4]  Yongsheng Gao,et al.  Control of the traverse grinding process using dynamically active workpiece steadies , 1993 .

[5]  Yongsheng Gao,et al.  An in-process form error measurement system for precision machining , 2010 .

[6]  Thomas R. Kurfess,et al.  Adaptive pole-zero cancellation in grinding force control , 1999, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[7]  Ichiro Inasaki,et al.  Monitoring Systems for Grinding Processes , 2006 .

[8]  P. Venkateswara Rao,et al.  A new chip-thickness model for performance assessment of silicon carbide grinding , 2004 .

[9]  Yunn-Shiuan Liao,et al.  A thermal model of the wet grinding process , 2000 .

[10]  Fengfeng Xi,et al.  Modeling and predicting surface roughness of the grinding process , 2002 .

[11]  W. Rowe,et al.  Handbook of Machining with Grinding Wheels , 2006 .

[12]  Yongsheng Gao,et al.  Experimental Validation of a Dynamic Workpiece Steady Control Method for Traverse Grinding , 1998 .

[13]  David L. Trumper,et al.  High-precision magnetic levitation stage for photolithography , 1998 .

[14]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Multiscale functional analysis of wear: A fractal model of the grinding process , 2005 .

[15]  Steven Y. Liang,et al.  Grinding force and power modeling based on chip thickness analysis , 2007 .

[16]  David L. Trumper,et al.  Design of a rotary fast tool servo for ophthalmic lens fabrication , 1999 .

[17]  Ichiro Inasaki,et al.  Tribology of Abrasive Machining Processes , 2004 .

[18]  Roman Szewczyk,et al.  Recent Advances in Mechatronics , 2007 .

[19]  Stephen Malkin,et al.  Grinding Technology: Theory and Applications of Machining with Abrasives , 1989 .

[20]  M. Weck,et al.  Dynamic Behaviour of Cylindrical Traverse Grinding Processes , 2001 .

[21]  Lihui Wang,et al.  Condition monitoring and control for intelligent manufacturing , 2006 .

[22]  T. Horng Modeling and simulation of material removal in planarization process , 2008 .

[23]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  Surfaces and their Measurement , 2002 .

[24]  Development of an In-process Form Error Measurement System for Surface Grinding , 2009 .

[25]  Jinyuan Tang,et al.  Modeling and experimental study of grinding forces in surface grinding , 2009 .

[26]  A.G. Mamalis,et al.  Development of an Expert System of Diamond Grinding of Superhard Polycrystalline Materials Considering Grinding Wheel Relief , 2001 .

[27]  Dilip Kumar Pratihar,et al.  Prediction of grinding power and surface finish - a GA-fuzzy approach , 2004, Integr. Comput. Aided Eng..