Fully developed viscous and viscoelastic flows in curved pipes

Some h-p finite element computations have been carried out to obtain solutions for fully developed laminar flows in curved pipes with curvature ratios from 0.001 to 0.5. An Oldroyd-3-constant model is used to represent the viscoelastic fluid, which includes the upper-convected Maxwell (UCM) model and the Oldroyd-B model as special cases. With this model we can examine separately the effects of the fluid inertia, and the first and second normal-stress differences. From analysis of the global torque and force balances, three criteria are proposed for this problem to estimate the errors in the computations. Moreover, the finite element solutions are accurately confirmed by the perturbation solutions of Robertson & Muller (1996) in the cases of small Reynolds/Deborah numbers. Our numerical solutions and an order-of-magnitude analysis of the governing equations elucidate the mechanism of the secondary flow in the absence of second normal-stress difference. For Newtonian flow, the pressure gradient near the wall region is the driving force for the secondary flow; for creeping viscoelastic flow, the combination of large axial normal stress with streamline curvature, the so-called hoop stress near the wall, promotes a secondary flow in the same direction as the inertial secondary flow, despite the adverse pressure gradient there; in the case of inertial viscoelastic flow, both the larger axial normal stress and the smaller inertia near the wall promote the secondary flow. For both Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids the secondary volumetric fluxes per unit of work consumption and per unit of axial volumetric flux first increase then decrease as the Reynolds/Deborah number increases; this behaviour should be of interest in engineering applications. Typical negative values of second normal-stress difference can drastically suppress the secondary flow and in the case of small curvature ratios, make the flow approximate the corresponding Poiseuille flow in a straight pipe. The viscoelasticity of Oldroyd-B fluid causes drag enhancement compared to Newtonian flow. Adding a typical negative second normal-stress difference produces large drag reductions for a small curvature ratio δ = 0.01; however, for a large curvature ratio δ = 0.2, although the secondary flows are also drastically attenuated by the second normal-stress difference, the flow resistance remains considerably higher than in Newtonian flow. It was observed that for the UCM and Oldroyd-B models, the limiting Deborah numbers met in our steady solution calculations obey the same scaling criterion as proposed by McKinley et al. (1996) for elastic instabilities; we present an intriguing problem on the relation between the Newton iteration for steady solutions and the linear stability analyses.

[1]  T. Hughes,et al.  Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1990 .

[2]  W. Y. Soh,et al.  Fully developed flow in a curved pipe of arbitrary curvature ratio , 1987 .

[3]  N. Phan-Thien,et al.  On the stability of the torsional flow of a class of Oldroyd-type fluids , 1985 .

[4]  Abraham M. Lenhoff,et al.  Flow in curved ducts: bifurcation structure for stationary ducts , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  J. D. Seader,et al.  Fully developed viscous flow in coiled circular pipes , 1973 .

[6]  M. Crochet,et al.  High-order finite element methods for steady viscoelastic flows , 1995 .

[7]  S. Datta Note on the Stability of an Elasticoviscous Liquid in Couette Flow , 1964 .

[8]  Anne M. Robertson,et al.  Flow of Oldroyd-B fluids in curved pipes of circular and annular cross-section , 1996 .

[9]  Y. Joo,et al.  Observations of purely elastic instabilities in the Taylor–Dean flow of a Boger fluid , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  M. Fortin,et al.  A new mixed finite element method for computing viscoelastic flows , 1995 .

[11]  Julio M. Ottino,et al.  Potentialities and limitations of mixing simulations , 1995 .

[12]  Krishnaswamy Nandakumar,et al.  Bifurcation in steady laminar flow through curved tubes , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  A. R. Davies,et al.  On viscoelastic effects in swirling flows , 1991 .

[14]  Kyoji Yamamoto,et al.  Dual solutions of the flow through a curved tube , 1989 .

[15]  Michael D. Graham,et al.  Effect of axial flow on viscoelastic Taylor–Couette instability , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  Ronald G. Larson,et al.  A purely elastic instability in Taylor–Couette flow , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  N. Phan-Thien,et al.  Galerkin/least-square finite-element methods for steady viscoelastic flows , 1999 .

[18]  H. Itō,et al.  Laminar Flow in Curved Pipes , 1969 .

[19]  W. Jones,et al.  The flow of dilute aqueous solutions of macromolecules in various geometries. III. Bent pipes and porous materials , 1976 .

[20]  S. Muller,et al.  The effects of gap width and dilute solution properties on the viscoelastic Taylor-Couette instability , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  D. Griffin,et al.  Finite-Element Analysis , 1975 .

[22]  S. Dennis Calculation of the steady flow through a curved tube using a new finite-difference method , 1980, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  K. Walters,et al.  On the flow of an elastico-viscous liquid in a curved pipe under a pressure gradient , 1963, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  M. Graham,et al.  Stability of viscoelastic shear flows subjected to steady or oscillatory transverse flow , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  Antony N. Beris,et al.  Spectral Calculations of Viscoelastic Flows: Evaluation of the Giesekus Constitutive Equation in Model Flow Problems , 1992 .

[26]  G. McKinley,et al.  Rheological and geometric scaling of purely elastic flow instabilities , 1996 .

[27]  Hassan Aref,et al.  Chaotic advection by laminar flow in a twisted pipe , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  Eric S. G. Shaq PURELY ELASTIC INSTABILITIES IN VISCOMETRIC FLOWS , 1996 .

[29]  Hidesato Ito,et al.  Flow in curved pipes. , 1987 .

[30]  W. R. Dean,et al.  Note on the motion of fluid in a curved pipe , 1959 .

[31]  S. Dennis,et al.  DUAL SOLUTIONS FOR STEADY LAMINAR FLOW THROUGH A CURVED TUBE , 1982 .