Multiphase fluid‐solid coupled analysis of shock‐bubble‐stone interaction in shockwave lithotripsy

A novel multiphase fluid-solid-coupled computational framework is applied to investigate the interaction of a kidney stone immersed in liquid with a lithotripsy shock wave (LSW) and a gas bubble near the stone. The main objective is to elucidate the effects of a bubble in the shock path to the elastic and fracture behaviors of the stone. The computational framework couples a finite volume 2-phase computational fluid dynamics solver with a finite element computational solid dynamics solver. The surface of the stone is represented as a dynamic embedded boundary in the computational fluid dynamics solver. The evolution of the bubble surface is captured by solving the level set equation. The interface conditions at the surfaces of the stone and the bubble are enforced through the construction and solution of local fluid-solid and 2-fluid Riemann problems. This computational framework is first verified for 3 example problems including a 1D multimaterial Riemann problem, a 3D shock-stone interaction problem, and a 3D shock-bubble interaction problem. Next, a series of shock-bubble-stone-coupled simulations are presented. This study suggests that the dynamic response of a bubble to LSW varies dramatically depending on its initial size. Bubbles with an initial radius smaller than a threshold collapse within 1 μs after the passage of LSW, whereas larger bubbles do not. For a typical LSW generated by an electrohydraulic lithotripter (pmax  = 35.0MPa, pmin  =- 10.1MPa), this threshold is approximately 0.12mm. Moreover, this study suggests that a noncollapsing bubble imposes a negative effect on stone fracture as it shields part of the LSW from the stone. On the other hand, a collapsing bubble may promote fracture on the proximal surface of the stone, yet hinder fracture from stone interior.

[1]  Michael R Bailey,et al.  A mechanistic analysis of stone fracture in lithotripsy. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  L. Rayleigh VIII. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity , 1917 .

[3]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Robust and provably second‐order explicit–explicit and implicit–explicit staggered time‐integrators for highly non‐linear compressible fluid–structure interaction problems , 2010 .

[4]  Xiaolin Li,et al.  A Robust Front Tracking Method: Verification and Application to Simulation of the Primary Breakup of a Liquid Jet , 2011, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[5]  Eric Johnsen,et al.  Shock-induced collapse of a gas bubble in shockwave lithotripsy. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Tim Colonius,et al.  Shock-induced collapse of a bubble inside a deformable vessel. , 2013, European journal of mechanics. B, Fluids.

[7]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A computational framework for the simulation of high‐speed multi‐material fluid–structure interaction problems with dynamic fracture , 2015 .

[8]  Rémi Abgrall,et al.  A Simple Method for Compressible Multifluid Flows , 1999, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A higher-order generalized ghost fluid method for the poor for the three-dimensional two-phase flow computation of underwater implosions , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[10]  Tim Colonius,et al.  Simulation of the effects of cavitation and anatomy in the shock path of model lithotripters , 2010, Urological Research.

[11]  Michael R. Bailey,et al.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy , 2005, Urological Research.

[12]  T. Kodama,et al.  Shock wave–bubble interaction near soft and rigid boundaries during lithotripsy: numerical analysis by the improved ghost fluid method , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  B. Matlaga Contemporary surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[14]  H. Sakaguchi,et al.  3D dynamic simulation of crack propagation in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy , 2010 .

[15]  Pei Zhong,et al.  A simple method for fabricating artificial kidney stones of different physical properties , 2010, Urological Research.

[16]  Kevin G. Wang,et al.  Algorithms for interface treatment and load computation in embedded boundary methods for fluid and fluid–structure interaction problems , 2011 .

[17]  Robin O Cleveland,et al.  Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  FIVER: A finite volume method based on exact two-phase Riemann problems and sparse grids for multi-material flows with large density jumps , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[19]  Emil M. Constantinescu,et al.  Multiphysics simulations , 2013, HiPC 2013.

[20]  Kevin G. Wang,et al.  Dynamic implosion of underwater cylindrical shells: Experiments and Computations , 2013 .

[21]  Arthur Seiji Daniel Rallu,et al.  A multiphase fluid-structure computational framework for underwater implosion problems , 2009 .

[22]  A. Szeri,et al.  Dynamics of bubbles near a rigid surface subjected to a lithotripter shock wave. Part 1. Consequences of interference between incident and reflected waves , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Kidney damage in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a numerical approach for different shock profiles , 2009, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[24]  Robin O Cleveland,et al.  Shock wave technology and application: an update. , 2011, European urology.

[25]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Nephrolithiasis Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of staghorn calculi. The American Urological Association Nephrolithiasis Clinical Guidelines Panel. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[26]  B. Sturtevant,et al.  Fracture mechanics model of stone comminution in ESWL and implications for tissue damage. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Computational algorithms for tracking dynamic fluid–structure interfaces in embedded boundary methods , 2012 .

[28]  Christopher S Saigal,et al.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. , 2012, European urology.

[29]  G. Preminger,et al.  A composite kidney stone phantom with mechanical properties controllable over the range of human kidney stones. , 2010, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[30]  S. Mitran,et al.  Experimentally validated multiphysics computational model of focusing and shock wave formation in an electromagnetic lithotripter. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Treatment of kidney stones: current lithotripsy devices are proving less effective in some cases , 2006, Nature Clinical Practice Urology.

[32]  Takahiro Matsuno,et al.  Numerical investigations of shock–bubble interactions in mercury , 2008 .

[33]  Michael L. Calvisi,et al.  Dynamics of bubbles near a rigid surface subjected to a lithotripter shock wave. Part 2. Reflected shock intensifies non-spherical cavitation collapse , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[34]  Bruno Castanié,et al.  Dynamic failure of composite and sandwich structures , 2013 .

[35]  David I. Lee,et al.  Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress? , 2002, Journal of endourology.

[36]  J. Mcateer,et al.  Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  M. L. Calvisi,et al.  Interaction of lithotripter shockwaves with single inertial cavitation bubbles , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  B. Matlaga The need for better decision tools in managing stone disease. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[39]  Xianyi Zeng,et al.  An enhanced FIVER method for multi-material flow problems with second-order convergence rate , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..

[40]  P. Zhong Shock Wave Lithotripsy , 2013 .