Acute downregulation of miR-155 at wound sites leads to a reduced fibrosis through attenuating inflammatory response.

Fibrosis, tightly associated with wound healing, is a significant symptomatic clinical problem. Inflammatory response was reported to be one of the reasons. MiR-155 is relatively related with the development and requirement of inflammatory cells, so we thought reduce the expression of miR-155 in wound sites could improve the quality of healing through reduce inflammatory response. To test this hypothesis, locally antagonizing miR-155 by directly injecting antagomir to wound edge was used to reduce the expression of miR-155. We found wounds treated with miR-155 antagomir had an obvious defect in immune cells requirements, pro-inflammatory factors IL-1β and TNF-α reduced while anti-inflammatory factor IL-10 increased. With treatment of miR-155 antagomir, the expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), Col1 and Col3 at wound sites all reduced both from mRNA levels and protein expressions. Wounds injected with antagomir resulted in the structure improvement of collagen, the collagen fibers were more regularly arranged. Meanwhile the rate of healing did not change significantly. These results provide direct evidences that miR-155 play an important role in the pathogenesis of fibrosis and show that miR-155 antagomir has the potential therapy in prevention and reduction of skin fibrosis.

[1]  S. Mckercher,et al.  Wound Healing in the PU.1 Null Mouse—Tissue Repair Is Not Dependent on Inflammatory Cells , 2003, Current Biology.

[2]  David Baltimore,et al.  MicroRNA-155 is induced during the macrophage inflammatory response , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  M. Goebeler,et al.  Chemokines in cutaneous wound healing , 2001, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[4]  A. Pivarcsi,et al.  MicroRNAs and immunity: novel players in the regulation of normal immune function and inflammation. , 2008, Seminars in cancer biology.

[5]  Paul Martin,et al.  Wound Healing--Aiming for Perfect Skin Regeneration , 1997, Science.

[6]  Anita B. Roberts,et al.  Mice lacking Smad3 show accelerated wound healing and an impaired local inflammatory response , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[7]  C. Croce,et al.  miR-155: On the Crosstalk Between Inflammation and Cancer , 2009, International reviews of immunology.

[8]  Zihua Hu,et al.  MicroRNA targets in immune genes and the Dicer/Argonaute and ARE machinery components. , 2008, Molecular immunology.

[9]  Brian Stramer,et al.  Wound healing and inflammation: embryos reveal the way to perfect repair. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  R. Ross,et al.  The role of the macrophage in wound repair. A study with hydrocortisone and antimacrophage serum. , 1975, The American journal of pathology.

[11]  N. Rajewsky,et al.  Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’ , 2005, Nature.

[12]  A. Mescher,et al.  Regeneration or scarring: An immunologic perspective , 2003, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[13]  R. Martinez-Nunez,et al.  MicroRNA-155 Modulates the Pathogen Binding Ability of Dendritic Cells (DCs) by Down-regulation of DC-specific Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-3 Grabbing Non-integrin (DC-SIGN)* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  J. Stenvang,et al.  Silencing of microRNA-155 in mice during acute inflammatory response leads to derepression of c/ebp Beta and down-regulation of G-CSF , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  J. Pfeilschifter,et al.  Large and sustained induction of chemokines during impaired wound healing in the genetically diabetic mouse: prolonged persistence of neutrophils and macrophages during the late phase of repair. , 2000, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[16]  Paul P M van Zuijlen,et al.  Differences in collagen architecture between keloid, hypertrophic scar, normotrophic scar, and normal skin: An objective histopathological analysis , 2009, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[17]  Paul Martin,et al.  Inflammatory cells during wound repair: the good, the bad and the ugly. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[18]  J. Brockes,et al.  Regeneration, tissue injury and the immune response , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[19]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  Requirement of bic/microRNA-155 for Normal Immune Function , 2007, Science.

[20]  A. Mescher,et al.  Regenerative capacity and the developing immune system. , 2005, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[21]  S. O'Kane,et al.  Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  L. DiPietro,et al.  Accelerated wound closure in neutrophil‐depleted mice , 2003, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[23]  R. Ogawa,et al.  Keloid and hypertrophic scar: neurogenic inflammation hypotheses. , 2008, Medical hypotheses.

[24]  N. Mukaida,et al.  Accelerated wound healing in tumor necrosis factor receptor p55‐deficient mice with reduced leukocyte infiltration , 2002, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[25]  Domenico Coppola,et al.  MicroRNA-155 Is Regulated by the Transforming Growth Factor β/Smad Pathway and Contributes to Epithelial Cell Plasticity by Targeting RhoA , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.