Hysteroscopic sterilization using a virtual reality simulator: assessment of learning curve.

STUDY OBJECTIVE To assess the learning curve using a virtual reality simulator for hysteroscopic sterilization with the Essure method. DESIGN Prospective multicenter study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING University and teaching hospital in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS Thirty novices (medical students) and five experts (gynecologists who had performed >150 Essure sterilization procedures). INTERVENTIONS All participants performed nine repetitions of bilateral Essure placement on the simulator. Novices returned after 2 weeks and performed a second series of five repetitions to assess retention of skills. Structured observations on performance using the Global Rating Scale and parameters derived from the simulator provided measurements for analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The learning curve is represented by improvement per procedure. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to analyze learning curves. Effect size (ES) was calculated to express the practical significance of the results (ES ≥ 0.50 indicates a large learning effect). For all parameters, significant improvements were found in novice performance within nine repetitions. Large learning effects were established for six of eight parameters (p < .001; ES, 0.50-0.96). Novices approached expert level within 9 to 14 repetitions. CONCLUSION The learning curve established in this study endorses future implementation of the simulator in curricula on hysteroscopic skill acquisition for clinicians who are interested in learning this sterilization technique.

[1]  M. Bajka,et al.  Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  R. Aggarwal,et al.  Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Construct validity and assessment of the learning curve for the SIMENDO endoscopic simulator , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Evaluation of a new virtual-reality training simulator for hysteroscopy , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  B. Davies,et al.  Robotic surgery , 1993, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[6]  R. Reznick,et al.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  Betty Chou,et al.  Simulators and virtual reality in surgical education. , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[8]  R. Muradore,et al.  Robotic Surgery , 2011, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[9]  C. R. Larsen,et al.  Retention of laparoscopic procedural skills acquired on a virtual-reality surgical trainer , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  M Schijven,et al.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator. , 2003, Surgical endoscopy.

[11]  Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier,et al.  Acquisition of flexible cystoscopy skills on a virtual reality simulator by experts and novices , 2010, BJU international.

[12]  Gang Xu,et al.  A Visitor's Guide to Effect Sizes – Statistical Significance Versus Practical (Clinical) Importance of Research Findings , 2004, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[13]  Elspeth M McDougall,et al.  Validation of surgical simulators. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[14]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Establishing construct validity of a virtual-reality training simulator for hysteroscopy via a multimetric scoring system , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  F. Broekmans,et al.  A virtual reality simulator for hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization micro-inserts: the face and construct validity , 2013, Gynecological Surgery.

[16]  R. Aggarwal,et al.  Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  Gerard S Letterie,et al.  How virtual reality may enhance training in obstetrics and gynecology. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  M. Schijven,et al.  Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review , 2012, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  A. Darzi,et al.  Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship , 2004, Medical education.

[20]  Matthias Harders,et al.  Comparing Automatic Simulator Assessment with Expert Assessment of Virtual Surgical Procedures , 2010, ISMBS.

[21]  B. Goff,et al.  A new curriculum for hysteroscopy training as demonstrated by an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS). , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  Daniel B. Jones,et al.  Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.