Demonstrating the Use of Non-targeted Analysis for Identification of Unknown Chemicals in Rapid Response Scenarios.

Several thousand intentional and unintentional chemical releases occur annually in the U.S., with the contents of almost 30% being of unknown composition. When targeted methods are unable to identify the chemicals present, alternative approaches, including non-targeted analysis (NTA) methods, can be used to identify unknown analytes. With new and efficient data processing workflows, it is becoming possible to achieve confident chemical identifications via NTA in a timescale useful for rapid response (typically 24-72 h after sample receipt). To demonstrate the potential usefulness of NTA in rapid response situations, we have designed three mock scenarios that mimic real-world events, including a chemical warfare agent attack, the contamination of a home with illicit drugs, and an accidental industrial spill. Using a novel, focused NTA method that utilizes both existing and new data processing/analysis methods, we have identified the most important chemicals of interest in each of these designed mock scenarios in a rapid manner, correctly assigning structures to more than half of the 17 total features investigated. We have also identified four metrics (speed, confidence, hazard information, and transferability) that successful rapid response analytical methods should address and have discussed our performance for each metric. The results reveal the usefulness of NTA in rapid response scenarios, especially when unknown stressors need timely and confident identification.

[1]  V. Bartkevičs,et al.  Targeted and non-targeted analysis for the investigation of pesticides influence on wheat cultivated under field conditions. , 2022, Environmental pollution.

[2]  Jeffrey M. Minucci,et al.  Uncertainty estimation strategies for quantitative non-targeted analysis , 2022, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[3]  J. Sobus,et al.  Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization , 2021, Environment international.

[4]  B. Warth,et al.  Nontargeted Analysis Study Reporting Tool: A Framework to Improve Research Transparency and Reproducibility. , 2021, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  D. Helbling,et al.  Evaluation, optimization, and application of three independent suspect screening workflows for the characterization of PFASs in water. , 2021, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[6]  Ivan I. Rusyn,et al.  Analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Bay following a large-scale industrial fire using ion-mobility-spectrometry-mass spectrometry. , 2021, Journal of environmental sciences.

[7]  Seth R. Newton,et al.  A Framework for Utilizing High‐Resolution Mass Spectrometry and Nontargeted Analysis in Rapid Response and Emergency Situations , 2021, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[8]  P. L. Ferguson,et al.  Assessment of emerging polar organic pollutants linked to contaminant pathways within an urban estuary using non-targeted analysis. , 2021, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[9]  S. Fenton,et al.  Reconstructing the Composition of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Contemporary Aqueous Film-Forming Foams. , 2021, Environmental science & technology letters.

[10]  I. Rusyn,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Analytical Techniques for Rapid Oil Spill Identification , 2020, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[11]  I. Rusyn,et al.  Rapid Characterization of Emerging Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Seth R. Newton,et al.  Examining NTA performance and potential using fortified and reference house dust as part of EPA’s Non-Targeted Analysis Collaborative Trial (ENTACT) , 2020, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[13]  Leora Vegosen,et al.  An automated framework for compiling and integrating chemical hazard data , 2020, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[14]  Yinglong J. Zhang,et al.  Massive pollutants released to Galveston Bay during Hurricane Harvey: Understanding their retention and pathway using Lagrangian numerical simulations. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  EPA’s DSSTox database: History of development of a curated chemistry resource supporting computational toxicology research , 2019, Computational toxicology.

[16]  Kamel Mansouri,et al.  Suspect screening and non-targeted analysis of drinking water using point-of-use filters. , 2018, Environmental pollution.

[17]  Seth R. Newton,et al.  Novel Polyfluorinated Compounds Identified Using High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Downstream of Manufacturing Facilities near Decatur, Alabama. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Linking high resolution mass spectrometry data with exposure and toxicity forecasts to advance high-throughput environmental monitoring. , 2016, Environment international.

[19]  K. Fraser,et al.  Non-targeted analysis by LC-MS of major metabolite changes during the oolong tea manufacturing in New Zealand. , 2014, Food chemistry.

[20]  Emma L. Schymanski,et al.  Identifying small molecules via high resolution mass spectrometry: communicating confidence. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.