A fuzzy model for evaluating metal detection equipment at airport security screening checkpoints

Every passenger who travels by air is exposed to security screening. As part of this procedure, the passenger typically is screened by a walk-through metal detector. Such a device should effectively detect prohibited metal items while simultaneously ensuring adequate throughput at the security screening checkpoint. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate both these factors when selecting an appropriate walk-through metal detector and its parameters. However, while it is easy to measure passenger throughput, it is much more difficult to determine the effectiveness of a detector, which is a subjective concept.This paper presents a quantitative method for evaluating the effectiveness of walk-through metal detectors. Since the evaluation is subjective and based on incomplete and imprecise input information, a fuzzy inference method is used, where the input values are expressed as linguistic variables. The research presented in this paper involved field measurements of the sensitivity of walk-through metal detectors and a survey of experts in order to correctly determine the detector sensitivity values. The model for evaluating walk-through metal detectors is implemented in FUGAS (Fuzzy Gate Assessment System), which was tested at the Katowice-Pyrzowice Airport in Poland. The experimental results demonstrate that a fuzzy inference system can be very effective at assisting airport managers in selecting and configuring the equipment used at airport security screening checkpoints.

[1]  Alexandre G. de Barros,et al.  Quantitative analysis of passenger and baggage security screening at airports , 2007 .

[2]  Arthur Gerstenfeld,et al.  A decision-analysis approach for optimal airport security , 2011, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[3]  Li Lin,et al.  Simulation-based Selectee Lane queueing design for passenger checkpoint screening , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Sheldon H. Jacobson,et al.  Optimal Aviation Security Screening Strategies With Dynamic Passenger Risk Updates , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Jacek Skorupski,et al.  A fuzzy reasoning system for evaluating the efficiency of cabin baggage screening at airports , 2015 .

[6]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  Jose Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez,et al.  A mathematical framework for passenger screening optimization via a multi-objective evolutionary approach , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[8]  Ilker Akgun,et al.  Fuzzy integrated vulnerability assessment model for critical facilities in combating the terrorism , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Chieh-Yuan Tsai,et al.  A decision rules approach for improvement of airport service quality , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Jacek Skorupski,et al.  Multi-criteria group decision making under uncertainty with application to air traffic safety , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Stefano Panzieri,et al.  Fuzzy dynamic input-output inoperability model , 2011, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[12]  S. Agaian,et al.  A New Concept of Airport Security Screening , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security.

[13]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Paul P. Wu,et al.  A review of models and model usage scenarios for an airport complex system , 2013 .

[15]  Paul P. Wu,et al.  Scenarios for a complex systems airport modelling framework , 2013 .

[16]  Alan Kirschenbaum.  The cost of airport security: The passenger dilemma , 2013 .

[17]  Rongfang Liu,et al.  Improving airport security screening checkpoint operations in the US via paced system design , 2011 .

[18]  Coen Van Gulijk,et al.  Trusting technology: Security decision making at airports , 2012 .

[19]  Youn Chul Choi,et al.  Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Identifying Relative Importance of Factors to Improve Passenger Security Checks at Airports , 2006 .

[20]  O. Wetter,et al.  Imaging in airport security: Past, present, future, and the link to forensic and clinical radiology , 2013 .

[21]  Jacek Skorupski,et al.  A fuzzy system to support the configuration of baggage screening devices at an airport , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of airport security: Are airports too safe? , 2014 .

[23]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Risk-informed decision support for assessing the costs and benefits of counter-terrorism protective measures for infrastructure , 2010, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[24]  Martin Moser,et al.  Information Technology Security Threats to Modern e-Enabled Aircraft: A Cautionary Note , 2014, J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst..

[25]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy expert systems and fuzzy reasoning , 2004 .

[26]  F. Mannering,et al.  Airport Security Screening and Changing Passenger Satisfaction: An Exploratory Assessment , 2006 .

[27]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  A hazard-based analysis of airport security transit times , 2013 .

[28]  Wolfgang Koch,et al.  Combined person tracking and classification in a network of chemical sensors , 2008, 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[29]  Tamara L. Ansons,et al.  Airport security measures and their influence on enplanement intentions: Responses from leisure travelers attending a Canadian University , 2014 .

[30]  Nicholas G. Paulter,et al.  Users' Guide for Hand-Held and Walk-Through Metal Detectors , 2001 .