Variance in Centrality within Rock Hyrax Social Networks Predicts Adult Longevity

Background In communal mammals the levels of social interaction among group members vary considerably. In recent years, biologists have realized that within-group interactions may affect survival of the group members. Several recent studies have demonstrated that the social integration of adult females is positively associated with infant survival, and female longevity is affected by the strength and stability of the individual social bonds. Our aim was to determine the social factors that influence adult longevity in social mammals. Methodology/Principal Findings As a model system, we studied the social rock hyrax (Procavia capensis), a plural breeder with low reproductive skew, whose groups are mainly composed of females. We applied network theory using 11 years of behavioral data to quantify the centrality of individuals within groups, and found adult longevity to be inversely correlated to the variance in centrality. In other words, animals in groups with more equal associations lived longer. Individual centrality was not correlated with longevity, implying that social tension may affect all group members and not only the weakest or less connected ones. Conclusions/Significance Our novel findings support previous studies emphasizing the adaptive value of social associations and the consequences of inequality among adults within social groups. However, contrary to previous studies, we suggest that it is not the number or strength of associations that an adult individual has (i.e. centrality) that is important, but the overall configuration of social relationships within the group (i.e. centrality SD) that is a key factor in influencing longevity.

[1]  Jeffrey A. Fletcher,et al.  The Kin Composition of Social Groups: Trading Group Size for Degree of Altruism , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[2]  D. Lusseau,et al.  Animal social networks: an introduction , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  J. Krause,et al.  Potential banana skins in animal social network analysis , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[4]  W. Getz,et al.  Hierarchical dominance structure and social organization in African elephants, Loxodonta africana , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Jan A. Randall,et al.  Flexible social structure of a desert rodent, Rhombomys opimus: philopatry, kinship, and ecological constraints , 2005 .

[6]  R. R. Krausz.  Living in Groups , 2013 .

[7]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[8]  R. Connor,et al.  Exploring Animal Social Networks, D.P. Croft, R. James, J. Krause. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press (2008), Pp. viii+192. Price $35.00 paperback , 2009 .

[9]  Illés J. Farkas,et al.  CFinder: locating cliques and overlapping modules in biological networks , 2006, Bioinform..

[10]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[11]  J. Gentle,et al.  Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. , 1990 .

[12]  J. Hoogland.  Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Coteries are Cooperatively Breeding Units , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[13]  C. Packer,et al.  Why Lions Form Groups: Food is Not Enough , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[14]  D.,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR , 2002 .

[15]  R. Estes,et al.  The Behavior Guide to African Mammals: Including Hoofed Mammals, Carnivores, Primates , 1991 .

[16]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[17]  A. Vespignani,et al.  The architecture of complex weighted networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  H. Hoeck.  Population Dynamics, Dispersal and Genetic Isolation in two Species of Hyrax (Heterohyrax brucei and Procavia johnstoni) on Habitat Islands in the Serengeti1,2) , 2010 .

[20]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Eric A. Vance,et al.  Age, musth and paternity success in wild male African elephants, Loxodonta africana , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  David R. Anderson,et al.  AIC MODEL SELECTION IN OVERDISPERSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA' , 1994 .

[23]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Amanda J Lea,et al.  Heritable victimization and the benefits of agonistic relationships , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  J. Silk,et al.  The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  L. Bejder,et al.  A method for testing association patterns of social animals , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Timothy B. Smith,et al.  Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[28]  E. Geffen,et al.  Androgens and social status in female rock hyraxes , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  Elissa Z Cameron,et al.  Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  J Hall Ailsa,et al.  Factors affecting first‐year survival in grey seals and their implications for life history strategy , 2001 .

[31]  Richard J. Barker,et al.  JOINT MODELING OF LIVE-RECAPTURE, TAG-RESIGHT, AND TAG-RECOVERY DATA , 1997 .

[32]  J. Sale.  The Behaviour of the Resting Rock Hyrax in Relation to its Environment , 1970 .

[33]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Constraints on group size in primates and carnivores: population density and day-range as assays of exploitation competition , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  A Griffin,et al.  Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat groups. , 2001, Science.

[35]  Marta B. Manser,et al.  Predation, group size and mortality in a cooperative mongoose, Suricata suricatta. , 1999 .

[36]  Tim Clutton-Brock,et al.  Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. , 2002, Science.

[37]  E. Geffen,et al.  Social status and cortisol levels in singing rock hyraxes , 2008, Hormones and Behavior.

[38]  E. Geffen,et al.  Elevated testosterone levels and social ranks in female rock hyrax , 2006, Hormones and Behavior.

[39]  H. Hoeck.  Demography and competition in Hyrax , 1989, Oecologia.

[40]  M. Zelen,et al.  Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples☆ , 1989 .

[41]  Denis Boyer,et al.  Association networks in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[42]  S. J. Hodge.  Helpers benefit offspring in both the short and long-term in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  S. Creel,et al.  Six ecological factors that may limit African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus , 1998 .

[44]  Croom Helm,et al.  Data Source: Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. Newbury Park, California: SAGE Publications. , 1991 .

[45]  R. Carter.  11 – IT and society , 1991 .

[46]  P. Hoeck,et al.  Flexible Social Organization in Hyrax1) , 2010 .

[47]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society , 2005, Nature.

[48]  Robert M. Seyfarth,et al.  Strong and Consistent Social Bonds Enhance the Longevity of Female Baboons , 2010, Current Biology.

[49]  Jeanne Altmann,et al.  Social Bonds of Female Baboons Enhance Infant Survival , 2003, Science.

[50]  R. Sapolsky.  The Influence of Social Hierarchy on Primate Health , 2005, Science.

[51]  Craig Packer,et al.  Group territoriality and the benefits of sociality in the African lion, Panthera leo , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[53]  D. M. Ha,et al.  A gentle introduction , 2006 .

[54]  T. Clutton‐Brock.  Reproductive success : studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems , 1989 .

[55]  S. M. Ramsay,et al.  Variation in social rank acquisition influences lifetime reproductive success in black-capped chickadees , 2007 .

[56]  T. Clutton‐Brock.  Structure and function in mammalian societies , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies , 1992 .