Seriality in LF Parsing

This paper examines the nature of LF parsing with respect to the number of alternative semantic representations considered simultaneously. Much research on phrase structure parsing suggests that multiple phrase structure representations are considered in parallel as the sentence unfolds, with one ultimately chosen as the correct parse. This paper presents a novel experimental procedure, the Incremental Verification Task (IVT), a technique designed to examine the processing of global ambiguity. We find evidence that although the parser can entertain multiple syntactic alternatives simultaneously, LF parsing is fundamentally different. We suggest that the parser processes LF alternatives in serial, first adhering to the representation that most closely matches the surface structure, and revising only if necessary. keywords: Parsing, Scope Ambiguity

[1]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities , 1993, Cognition.

[2]  Allison Blodgett,et al.  Understanding the Constraints on Syntactic Generation: Lexical Bias and Discourse Congruency Effects on Eye Movements , 2001 .

[3]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Mark Steedman,et al.  On not being led up the garden path : The use of context by the psychological syntax processor , 1985 .

[5]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Ambiguity in context , 1989 .

[6]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[7]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[8]  J. Trueswell THE ROLE OF LEXICAL FREQUENCY IN SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION , 1996 .

[9]  J. Kimball Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .

[10]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[11]  Katy Carlson,et al.  Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Ellipsis Sentences , 2002 .

[12]  Julie E. Boland The Relationship Between Syntactic and Semantic Processes in Sentence Comprehension. , 1997 .

[13]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[14]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Navigating negative quantificational space , 2000 .

[15]  M. Pickering,et al.  Search Strategies in Syntactic Reanalysis , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[16]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  Structural economy in the processing and representation Of gapping sentences , 2005 .

[17]  N. Pearlmutter,et al.  Serial versus Parallel Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[18]  Susanne Lynn Tunstall,et al.  The interpretation of quantifiers : semantics & processing , 1998 .

[19]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 1999 .

[20]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Interaction with autonomy: Multiple Output models and the inadequacy of the Great Divide , 1996, Cognition.