Strategies and mechanisms for electronic peer review

We have implemented a peer grading system for review of student assignments over the World Wide Web and used it in approximately eight courses in computing and electrical engineering. Students prepare their assignments and submit them to our Peer Grader (PG) system. Other students are then assigned to review and grade the assignments. The system allows authors and reviewers to communicate, with authors being able to update their submissions. Unique features of our approach include the ability to submit arbitrary sets of Web pages for review, and mechanisms for encouraging careful review of submissions. Electronic peer review facilitates collaborative learning in several ways. First, there is the obvious fact that students can learn from their reviewers' comments. Second, students help each other to improve their communication skills. Third, in team projects, peer review allows team members to be assessed by each other. Finally, peer review makes it possible to break up a large project into small chunks. In fact, new releases of PG are being developed in exactly this way.

[1]  V. Druskat,et al.  Effects and timing of developmental peer appraisals in self-managing work groups. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Christopher Rushton,et al.  Peer Assessment in a Collaborative Hypermedia Environment: A Case Study. , 1993 .

[3]  E.F. Gehringer,et al.  A Web-based computer architecture course database , 2000, 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135).

[4]  Brian P. Mathews,et al.  Assessing Individual Contributions: Experience of Peer Evaluation in Major Group Projects , 1994, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  K. Topping Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[6]  David Kember,et al.  Peer Assessment of an Individual ‘s Contribution to a Group Project , 1993 .

[7]  T Downing,et al.  Learning by cooperative publishing on the World-Wide Web , 1997 .

[8]  Edward F. Gehringer Peer Grading Over The Web: Enhancing Education In Design Courses , 1999 .

[9]  Barbara J. Millis,et al.  Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty , 1997 .

[10]  J. MacAlpine,et al.  Improving and Encouraging Peer Assessment of Student Presentations , 1999 .

[11]  Shirley Earl,et al.  STAFF AND PEER ASSESSMENT ‐ MEASURING AN INDIVIDUAL'S CONTRIBUTION TO GROUP PERFORMANCE , 1986 .

[12]  Francis Lopez-Real,et al.  Peer Assessment of a Group Project in a Primary Mathematics Education Course , 1999 .

[13]  Robert Maranto,et al.  Using “World Series Shares” to Fight Free Riding in Group Projects , 1998, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[14]  Peter M. Kerr,et al.  Peer Grading of Essays in a Principles of Microeconomics Course , 1995 .

[15]  Elizabeth A. Eschenbach,et al.  Web Based Forms For Design Team Peer Evaluations , 1998 .

[16]  Bob Wayne Ford The effects of peer editing/grading on the grammar-usage and theme-composition ability of college freshmen / , 1973 .