Three-dimensional architecture constructed from a graphene oxide nanosheet–polymer composite for high-flux forward osmosis membranes

Forward osmosis (FO) membrane technology holds significant potential to address the global challenges in sustainable water and energy supply. The development of FO membranes possessing a three-dimensional (3D) architecture with interconnected channels in their support layers remains exceedingly desirable and challenging to overcome the intrinsic internal concentration polarization (ICP) bottleneck in FO water flux. For the first time, a novel 3D interconnected porous architecture is constructed using a graphene oxide (GO) nanosheet–polymer composite via a facile and economic phase-inversion approach, and the as-synthesized GO-polymer 3D architecture is successfully used as the support layer of an FO membrane. This GO-polymer 3D architecture provides shortcut pathways for water molecules to readily pass through, which minimizes support layer tortuosity to 1.55 ± 0.13 (one of the best values in the literature). The minimization of tortuosity significantly reduces the support layer structural parameter and thereby effectively mitigates ICP. As a result, the FO water flux (JW) of the membrane with the GO-polymer 3D architecture reaches 18.3 ± 1.5 L m−2 h−1 (salt rejection: 94.8% ± 1.2%), which is 73% higher than the JW of the membrane with the conventional 1D architecture and 280% times higher than the JW of the commercial HTI CTA FO membrane under the same operating conditions. More importantly, the mechanism for the formation of this 3D architecture is carefully revealed by developing a new theory, i.e. GO-induced phase inversion, for the architecture transformation process. Through systematic study of the 2D GO nanosheets and traditional 0D/1D nanomaterials as membrane building blocks, the unique role of the 2D structural characteristics of GO in forming this 3D membrane architecture is unveiled. This study opens a new door for the construction of 3D architectures using 2D nanomaterials for the development of high performance membranes.

[1]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[2]  M. Pakizeh,et al.  The effect of functionalized SiO2 nanoparticles on the morphology and triazines separation properties of cellulose acetate membranes , 2016 .

[3]  Tongwen Xu,et al.  Graphene oxide modified graphitic carbon nitride as a modifier for thin film composite forward osmosis membrane , 2015 .

[4]  Jijun Zhao,et al.  Graphene oxide: A promising nanomaterial for energy and environmental applications , 2015 .

[5]  L. Francis,et al.  Dispersible Exfoliated Zeolite Nanosheets and Their Application as a Selective Membrane , 2011, Science.

[6]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Water Purification by Membranes: The Role of Polymer Science , 2010 .

[7]  Xiaoxiao Song,et al.  A new nano-engineered hierarchical membrane for concurrent removal of surfactant and oil from oil-in-water nanoemulsion , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[8]  A. Boschetti-de-Fierro,et al.  Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) mixed polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ultrafiltration membranes , 2012 .

[9]  Bo Wang,et al.  Finger-like voids induced by viscous fingering during phase inversion of alumina/PES/NMP suspensions , 2012 .

[10]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .

[11]  N. Hilal,et al.  A review on membrane fabrication: Structure, properties and performance relationship , 2013 .

[12]  Dustin K. James,et al.  New Routes to Graphene, Graphene Oxide and Their Related Applications , 2012, Advanced materials.

[13]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation , 2006 .

[14]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents , 2010 .

[15]  Cong-jie Gao,et al.  Preparation and properties of functionalized carbon nanotube/PSF blend ultrafiltration membranes , 2009 .

[16]  Mohsen Jahanshahi,et al.  Synthesis of novel thin film nanocomposite (TFN) forward osmosis membranes using functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes , 2013 .

[17]  M. Jahanshahi,et al.  Highly porous cellulosic nanocomposite membranes with enhanced performance for forward osmosis desalination , 2016 .

[18]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[19]  C. Faur,et al.  High performance PVDF-TiO2 membranes for water treatment , 2015 .

[20]  Freek Kapteijn,et al.  Metal-organic framework nanosheets in polymer composite materials for gas separation , 2014, Nature materials.

[21]  Xiaoxiao Song,et al.  Nano Gives the Answer: Breaking the Bottleneck of Internal Concentration Polarization with a Nanofiber Composite Forward Osmosis Membrane for a High Water Production Rate , 2011, Advanced materials.

[22]  G. Shi,et al.  Self-assembled graphene hydrogel via a one-step hydrothermal process. , 2010, ACS nano.

[23]  A. Ismail,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane with hydrophilic nanocomposite support to reduce internal concentration polarization , 2014 .

[24]  Andre K. Geim,et al.  The rise of graphene. , 2007, Nature materials.

[25]  Jun Chen,et al.  A Leavening Strategy to Prepare Reduced Graphene Oxide Foams , 2012, Advanced materials.

[26]  Sheng Dai,et al.  Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer graphene. , 2015, Nature nanotechnology.

[27]  Anthony P. Straub,et al.  Thermodynamic limits of extractable energy by pressure retarded osmosis , 2014 .

[28]  Navin K. Rastogi,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges in Application of Forward Osmosis in Food Processing , 2016, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[29]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[30]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[31]  H. Bai,et al.  A new nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane custom-designed for treating shale gas wastewater , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[32]  Yilmaz Yurekli.  Removal of heavy metals in wastewater by using zeolite nano-particles impregnated polysulfone membranes. , 2016, Journal of hazardous materials.

[33]  J S Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Forward osmosis niches in seawater desalination and wastewater reuse. , 2014, Water research.

[34]  Xiaoxiao Song,et al.  Energy recovery from concentrated seawater brine by thin-film nanofiber composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes with high power density , 2013 .

[35]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water , 2012, Nature.

[36]  Zhichao Wu,et al.  A pilot-scale forward osmosis membrane system for concentrating low-strength municipal wastewater: performance and implications , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[37]  E. Singer.  New technologies deliver in treating neurological diseases , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[38]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Forward with osmosis: emerging applications for greater sustainability. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  H. Shon,et al.  Graphene oxide incorporated polysulfone substrate for the fabrication of flat-sheet thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes , 2015 .

[40]  Xiangju Song,et al.  Nanocomposite Membrane with Different Carbon Nanotubes Location for Nanofiltration and Forward Osmosis Applications , 2016 .

[41]  Qing Hua Wang,et al.  Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[42]  Robert Langer,et al.  Small-scale systems for in vivo drug delivery , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  Navin K. Rastogi,et al.  Forward osmosis for the concentration of anthocyanin from Garcinia indica Choisy , 2010 .

[44]  Darren Delai Sun,et al.  A low-energy forward osmosis process to produce drinking water , 2011 .

[45]  MaryTheresa M. Pendergast,et al.  Using nanocomposite materials technology to understand and control reverse osmosis membrane compaction , 2010 .

[46]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[48]  Dan Li,et al.  Biomimetic superelastic graphene-based cellular monoliths , 2012, Nature Communications.

[49]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  Mohsen Jahanshahi,et al.  The effect of SiO2 nanoparticles on morphology and performance of thin film composite membranes for forward osmosis application , 2014 .

[51]  Jan Feijen,et al.  Phase-Separation Processes in Polymer-Solutions in Relation to Membrane Formation , 1996 .

[52]  Tom Depuydt,et al.  Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[53]  P. Sukitpaneenit,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with macrovoid-free and highly porous structure for sustainable water production. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[54]  Zhongyi Jiang,et al.  Tuning the molecular structure, separation performance and interfacial properties of poly(vinyl alco , 2011 .

[55]  Ahmad Fauzi Ismail,et al.  Minimizing structural parameter of thin film composite forward osmosis membranes using polysulfone/halloysite nanotubes as membrane substrates , 2016 .