Conservation of structural fluctuations in homologous protein kinases and its implications on functional sites

Our aim is to explore the similarities in structural fluctuations of homologous kinases. Gaussian Network Model based Normal Mode Analysis was performed on 73 active conformation structures in Ser/Thr/Tyr kinase superfamily. Categories of kinases with progressive evolutionary divergence, viz. (i) Same kinase with many crystal structures, (ii) Within‐Subfamily, (iii) Within‐Family, (iv) Within‐Group, and (v) Across‐Group, were analyzed. We identified a flexibility signature conserved in all kinases involving residues in and around the catalytic loop with consistent low‐magnitude fluctuations. However, the overall structural fluctuation profiles are conserved better in closely related kinases (Within‐Subfamily and Within‐family) than in distant ones (Within‐Group and Across‐Group). A substantial 65.4% of variation in flexibility was not accounted by variation in sequences or structures. Interestingly, we identified substructural residue‐wise fluctuation patterns characteristic of kinases of different categories. Specifically, we recognized statistically significant fluctuations unique to families of protein kinase A, cyclin‐dependent kinases, and nonreceptor tyrosine kinases. These fluctuation signatures localized to sites known to participate in protein‐protein interactions typical of these kinase families. We report for the first time that residues characterized by fluctuations unique to the group/family are involved in interactions specific to the group/family. As highlighted for Src family, local regions with differential fluctuations are proposed as attractive targets for drug design. Overall, our study underscores the importance of consideration of fluctuations, over and above sequence and structural features, in understanding the roles of sites characteristic of kinases. Proteins 2016; 84:957–978. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  N. Srinivasan,et al.  A Gaussian network model study suggests that structural fluctuations are higher for inactive states than active states of protein kinases. , 2015, Molecular bioSystems.

[2]  Narayanaswamy Srinivasan,et al.  Typical and atypical domain combinations in human protein kinases: functions, disease causing mutations and conservation in other primates , 2015 .

[3]  Robert D. Finn,et al.  iPfam: a database of protein family and domain interactions found in the Protein Data Bank , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  Benjamin F. Cravatt,et al.  Functional Interplay between Caspase Cleavage and Phosphorylation Sculpts the Apoptotic Proteome , 2012, Cell.

[5]  L. Johnson,et al.  The structural basis for control of eukaryotic protein kinases. , 2012, Annual review of biochemistry.

[6]  Domenico L Gatti,et al.  Protein phosphorylation and prevention of cytochrome oxidase inhibition by ATP: coupled mechanisms of energy metabolism regulation. , 2011, Cell metabolism.

[7]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Realizing the allosteric potential of the tetrameric protein kinase A RIα holoenzyme. , 2011, Structure.

[8]  Narayanaswamy Srinivasan,et al.  Classification of Protein Kinases on the Basis of Both Kinase and Non-Kinase Regions , 2010, PloS one.

[9]  J. Colicelli,et al.  ABL Tyrosine Kinases: Evolution of Function, Regulation, and Specificity , 2010, Science Signaling.

[10]  Stefan Knapp,et al.  SH2 domains: modulators of nonreceptor tyrosine kinase activity , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[11]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  D-AKAP2 Interacts with Rab4 and Rab11 through Its RGS Domains and Regulates Transferrin Receptor Recycling* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  N. Gough,et al.  Focus Issue: The Protein Dynamics of Cell Signaling , 2009, Science Signaling.

[13]  Lila M. Gierasch,et al.  Sending Signals Dynamically , 2009, Science.

[14]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Protein Dynamism and Evolvability , 2009, Science.

[15]  Kristian Rother,et al.  Voronoia: analyzing packing in protein structures , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  S. Grant Therapeutic Protein Kinase Inhibitors , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[17]  J. Echave,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of protein vibrational dynamics. , 2008, Gene.

[18]  Nathaniel J. Traaseth,et al.  Allosteric cooperativity in protein kinase A , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Mindy I. Davis,et al.  A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  PKA-I Holoenzyme Structure Reveals a Mechanism for cAMP-Dependent Activation , 2007, Cell.

[21]  Mona Singh,et al.  Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation , 2007, Bioinform..

[22]  J. Ferrell,et al.  Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[23]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  Andrew F Neuwald,et al.  The hallmark of AGC kinase functional divergence is its C-terminal tail, a cis-acting regulatory module , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Trupti Joshi,et al.  Quantitative assessment of relationship between sequence similarity and function similarity , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[26]  Bao Q. Pham,et al.  A dynamic mechanism for AKAP binding to RII isoforms of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[27]  A. Konagurthu,et al.  MUSTANG: A multiple structural alignment algorithm , 2006, Proteins.

[28]  L. Šefc,et al.  Protein kinases, their function and implication in cancer and other diseases. , 2006, Folia biologica.

[29]  J. Echave,et al.  Evolutionary Conservation of Protein Backbone Flexibility , 2006, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[30]  I. Bahar,et al.  Normal mode analysis : theory and applications to biological and chemical systems , 2005 .

[31]  Chakra Chennubhotla,et al.  The Gaussian Network Model: Theory and Applications , 2005 .

[32]  Arvin C. Dar,et al.  Higher-Order Substrate Recognition of eIF2α by the RNA-Dependent Protein Kinase PKR , 2005, Cell.

[33]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  PKR and eIF2α: Integration of Kinase Dimerization, Activation, and Substrate Docking , 2005, Cell.

[34]  A. F. Neuwald,et al.  Did protein kinase regulatory mechanisms evolve through elaboration of a simple structural component? , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  Julian Echave,et al.  Exploring the common dynamics of homologous proteins. Application to the globin family. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[36]  I. Bahar,et al.  Coupling between catalytic site and collective dynamics: a requirement for mechanochemical activity of enzymes. , 2005, Structure.

[37]  T. Pawson,et al.  Protein phosphorylation in signaling--50 years and counting. , 2005, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[38]  J. Skolnick,et al.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  L. Wodicka,et al.  A small molecule–kinase interaction map for clinical kinase inhibitors , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[40]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Regulation of protein kinases; controlling activity through activation segment conformation. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[41]  T. Hunter,et al.  The mouse kinome: discovery and comparative genomics of all mouse protein kinases. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  A. Koleske,et al.  How do Abl family kinases regulate cell shape and movement? , 2004, Trends in cell biology.

[43]  Waldemar Celary,et al.  A comparative study on the biology of Macropis fulvipes (Fabricius, 1804) and Macropis europaea Warncke, 1973 (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Melittidae). , 2004, Folia biologica.

[44]  P. Forrer,et al.  PDZK1: I. a major scaffolder in brush borders of proximal tubular cells. , 2003, Kidney international.

[45]  D. Ringe,et al.  Determinants of the Src Homology Domain 3-Like Fold , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[46]  T. Hunter,et al.  The Protein Kinase Complement of the Human Genome , 2002, Science.

[47]  C. Orengo,et al.  One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  D. Barford,et al.  Molecular mechanism for the regulation of protein kinase B/Akt by hydrophobic motif phosphorylation. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[49]  J. Kuriyan,et al.  The Conformational Plasticity of Protein Kinases , 2002, Cell.

[50]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[51]  J. Adams,et al.  Kinetic and catalytic mechanisms of protein kinases. , 2001, Chemical reviews.

[52]  A. Newton,et al.  The Carboxyl Terminus of Protein Kinase C Provides a Switch to Regulate Its Interaction with the Phosphoinositide-dependent Kinase, PDK-1* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  Stefan Dimitrov,et al.  Histone H3 phosphorylation and cell division , 2001, Oncogene.

[54]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Annotation transfer for genomics: measuring functional divergence in multi-domain proteins. , 2001, Genome research.

[55]  D. Higgins,et al.  T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  J. Corbin,et al.  Phosphorylation of phosphodiesterase-5 by cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinase alters its catalytic and allosteric cGMP-binding activities. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[57]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behavior. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[58]  Maria Deak,et al.  Identification of a pocket in the PDK1 kinase domain that interacts with PIF and the C‐terminal residues of PKA , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[59]  T. Hunter,et al.  The protein kinases of Caenorhabditis elegans: a model for signal transduction in multicellular organisms. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Kinase phosphorylation: Keeping it all in the family , 1999, Current Biology.

[61]  T. Hunter,et al.  Protein kinase B/Akt-mediated phosphorylation promotes nuclear exclusion of the winged helix transcription factor FKHR1. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  J. Avruch,et al.  Intracellular signalling: PDK1 – a kinase at the hub of things , 1999, Current Biology.

[63]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Collective motions in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: examination of flexibility and enzyme function. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[64]  Robert L. Jernigan,et al.  Relating structure to function through the dominant slow modes of motion of DNA topoisomerase II , 1999 .

[65]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Vibrational dynamics of transfer RNAs: comparison of the free and synthetase-bound forms. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[66]  A Wlodawer,et al.  Catalytic triads and their relatives. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[67]  A. Murzin How far divergent evolution goes in proteins. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[68]  J. Habener,et al.  Phosphorylation of the cAMP response element binding protein CREB by cAMP-dependent protein kinase A and glycogen synthase kinase-3 alters DNA-binding affinity, conformation, and increases net charge. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[69]  S. Sudarsanam,et al.  Structural diversity of sequentially identical subsequences of proteins: Identical octapeptides can have different conformations , 1998, Proteins.

[70]  K. Axelsen,et al.  Evolution of Substrate Specificities in the P-Type ATPase Superfamily , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[71]  C. Craik,et al.  Evolutionary Divergence of Substrate Specificity within the Chymotrypsin-like Serine Protease Fold* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[72]  I. Bahar,et al.  Gaussian Dynamics of Folded Proteins , 1997 .

[73]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.

[74]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[75]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Functional Malleability of the Carboxyl-terminal Tail in Protein Kinase A , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[76]  P. S. Kim,et al.  Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence , 1996, Nature.

[77]  R F Doolittle,et al.  Convergent evolution: the need to be explicit. , 1994, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[78]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  2.2 A refined crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase complexed with MnATP and a peptide inhibitor. , 1993, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[79]  A. Ullrich,et al.  The SH2 and SH3 domain-containing protein GRB2 links receptor tyrosine kinases to ras signaling , 1992, Cell.

[80]  T Pawson,et al.  SH2 and SH3 domains: elements that control interactions of cytoplasmic signaling proteins. , 1991, Science.

[81]  Gregory A. Petsko,et al.  Mandelate racemase and muconate lactonizing enzyme are mechanistically distinct and structurally homologous , 1990, Nature.

[82]  T. Hunter,et al.  The protein kinase family: conserved features and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains. , 1988, Science.

[83]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation , 1985 .