Cigarette advertising and promotional strategies in retail outlets: results of a statewide survey in California

OBJECTIVE To examine the extent and types of cigarette advertising materials in stores and to assess tobacco company compliance with the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA). DESIGN A cross-sectional analysis of a random sample of 586 stores that sold cigarettes. SETTING US state of California. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Trained data collectors classified cigarette advertising materials by type (signs, displays, functional items), location (interior or exterior), and placement (below 3 feet (1 m) or near candy). RESULTS California retail outlets featured 17.2 (SD 16.1) tobacco advertising materials on average, and 94% of stores featured at least some advertising. About 85% of these were within 4 feet (1.3 m) of the counter. About 50% of the stores had ads at or below 3 feet, and 23% had cigarette product displays next to candy. In violation of the MSA, 3% of stores featured signs with cartoons and 11% had large exterior signs. CONCLUSIONS Tobacco companies are aggressively using stores to market cigarettes. Moreover, the spirit of the MSA—to protect children from cigarette advertising—has not been realised. Future studies should monitor industry use of this venue and assess the impact of exposure to cigarette advertising materials in stores on adult smokers and youth.

[1]  G. Giovino,et al.  Changes at the Point-of-Sale for Tobacco Following the 1999 Billboard Ban , 2000 .

[2]  P. P. Aitken,et al.  Reinforcing effects of cigarette advertising on under-age smoking. , 1990, British journal of addiction.

[3]  Control Program. Tobacco COntrol in California: Who's winning the war? An evaluation of the Tobacco Control Program, 1989-1996. Final Report. A report to the California Department of Health Services. , 1998 .

[4]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  USA: price cuts and point of sale ads follow tax rise , 1999, Tobacco control.

[5]  Rachel Jones Neurobiology of addiction: Leader of the pack , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  K. Warner Selling smoke : cigarette advertising and public health , 1986 .

[7]  M. Siegel,et al.  Outdoor tobacco advertising in six Boston neighborhoods. Evaluating youth exposure. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  J. Flora,et al.  Seventh graders' self-reported exposure to cigarette marketing and its relationship to their smoking behavior. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[9]  M. Zeller,et al.  The Food and Drug Administration's regulation of tobacco products. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[11]  Todd Rogers,et al.  Community Mobilization to Reduce Point-of-Purchase Advertising of Tobacco Products , 1995, Health education quarterly.

[12]  K. Cummings,et al.  Tobacco advertising in retail stores. , 1991, Public health reports.

[13]  Msa,et al.  Changes at the Point-of-Sale for Tobacco Following the 1999 Billboard Ban , 2000 .

[14]  K. Warner,et al.  The emerging market for long-term nicotine maintenance. , 1997, JAMA.

[15]  D Shopland,et al.  Does tobacco advertising target young people to start smoking? Evidence from California. , 1991, JAMA.

[16]  W. Grove Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[17]  S. Schinke,et al.  Preventing tobacco use among young people. , 1986, Health & social work.

[18]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Trends in adolescent smoking initiation in the United States: is tobacco marketing an influence? , 1997, Tobacco control.