Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment to engage students and increase their desire to learn

The authors have previously reported the effectiveness of using self and peer assessment to improve learning outcomes by providing opportunities to practise, assess and provide feedback on students’ attribute development. Despite this work and the research of others, we have found a significant number of students perceive self and peer assessment to be an instrument to facilitate fairness focusing on its freerider deterrent capacity, rather than providing opportunities for reflection and feedback to complete the learning cycle. It is the authors’ intention that all students would benefit, both from the reflective nature of self and peer assessment and the feedback it provides, and for these benefits to be seen as valuable and desirable so that students are eager to participate. In this paper we report investigating the use of self and peer assessment multiple times for different purposes within a single subject. In particular, we examine whether providing students with multiple opportunities to practise and receive feedback in different contexts encourages peer learning, increases engagement and students’ desire to learn.

[1]  Jo McKenzie,et al.  SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  John G. Hedberg,et al.  Engaging students with higher order learning (or not): insights into academic practice , 2008 .

[3]  Keith Willey,et al.  Completing the Learning Cycle: The Role of Formative Feedback When Using Self and Peer Assessment to Improve Teamwork and Engagement , 2006 .

[4]  Keith Willey,et al.  Improving teamwork and engagement: the case for self and peer assessment , 2006 .

[5]  Anne Gardner,et al.  Improvements in the self and peer assessment tool SPARK: Do they improve learning outcomes? , 2008 .

[6]  Chris Rust,et al.  A social constructivist assessment process model: how the research literature shows us this could be best practice , 2005 .

[7]  Judy Goldfinch,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A PEER ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE FOR OBTAINING INDIVIDUAL MARKS ON A GROUP PROJECT , 1990 .

[8]  Judy Goldfinch,et al.  Further Developments in Peer Assessment of Group Projects , 1994 .

[9]  D. Boud,et al.  Rethinking assessment in higher education : learning for the longer term , 2007 .

[10]  N. Falchikov,et al.  Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks , 2000 .

[11]  Anne Gardner,et al.  Using self and peer assessment for professional and team skill development: do well functioning teams experience all the benefits? , 2008 .

[12]  Anne Gardner,et al.  Using self assessment to integrate graduate attribute development with discipline content delivery , 2008 .