Protrusion and actin assembly are coupled to the organization of lamellar contractile structures.

Directed cell migration requires continuous cycles of protrusion of the leading edge and contraction to pull up the cell rear. How these spatially distributed processes are coordinated to maintain a state of persistent protrusion remains unknown. During wound healing responses of epithelial sheets, cells along the wound edge display two distinct morphologies: 'leader cells' exhibit persistent edge protrusions, while the greater majority of 'follower cells' randomly cycle between protrusion and retraction. Here, we exploit the heterogeneity in cell morphodynamic behaviors to deduce the requirements in terms of cytoskeleton dynamics for persistent and sporadic protrusion events. We used quantitative Fluorescent Speckle Microscopy (qFSM) to compare rates of F-actin assembly and flow relative to the local protrusion and retraction dynamics of the leading edge. Persistently protruding cells are characterized by contractile actomyosin structures that align with the direction of migration, with converging F-actin flows interpenetrating over a wide band in the lamella. Conversely, non-persistent protruders have their actomyosin structures aligned perpendicular to the axis of migration, and are characterized by prominent F-actin retrograde flows that end into transverse arcs. Analysis of F-actin kinetics in the lamellipodia showed that leader cells have three-fold higher assembly rates when compared to followers. To further investigate a putative relationship between actomyosin contraction and F-actin assembly, myosin II was inhibited by blebbistatin. Treated cells at the wound edge adopted a homogeneously persistent protrusion behavior, with rates matching those of leader cells. Surprisingly, we found that disintegration of actomyosin structures led to a significant decrease in F-actin assembly. Our data suggests that persistent protrusion in these cells is achieved by a reduction in overall F-actin retrograde flow, with lower assembly rates now sufficient to propel forward the leading edge. Based on our data we propose that differences in the protrusion persistence of leaders and followers originate in the distinct actomyosin contraction modules that differentially regulate leading edge protrusion-promoting F-actin assembly, and retraction-promoting retrograde flow.

[1]  T. Pollard,et al.  Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments , 2003, Cell.

[2]  J. Kolega.  The role of myosin II motor activity in distributing myosin asymmetrically and coupling protrusive activity to cell translocation. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[3]  Klemens Rottner,et al.  The lamellipodium: where motility begins. , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[4]  D. Taylor,et al.  A fluorescent protein biosensor of myosin II regulatory light chain phosphorylation reports a gradient of phosphorylated myosin II in migrating cells. , 1995, Molecular biology of the cell.

[5]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth , 1988, Neuron.

[6]  K. Rottner,et al.  Assembling an actin cytoskeleton for cell attachment and movement. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[7]  G. Danuser,et al.  Quantitative fluorescent speckle microscopy of cytoskeleton dynamics. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[8]  P. Forscher,et al.  Myosin drives retrograde F-actin flow in neuronal growth cones. , 1997, Neuron.

[9]  Miguel Vicente-Manzanares,et al.  Actin and α-actinin orchestrate the assembly and maturation of nascent adhesions in a myosin II motor-independent manner , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[10]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Differential Transmission of Actin Motion Within Focal Adhesions , 2007, Science.

[11]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Fluctuations of intracellular forces during cell protrusion , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[12]  Juliet Lee,et al.  Slipping or gripping? Fluorescent speckle microscopy in fish keratocytes reveals two different mechanisms for generating a retrograde flow of actin. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[13]  G. Danuser,et al.  Probing f-actin flow by tracking shape fluctuations of radial bundles in lamellipodia of motile cells. , 2000, Biophysical Journal.

[14]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Myosin IIA regulates cell motility and actomyosin–microtubule crosstalk , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Cofilin activity downstream of Pak1 regulates cell protrusion efficiency by organizing lamellipodium and lamella actin networks. , 2007, Developmental cell.

[16]  John G. Collard,et al.  Rac Downregulates Rho Activity: Reciprocal Balance between Both Gtpases Determines Cellular Morphology and Migratory Behavior , 1999 .

[17]  P. Vallotton,et al.  Simultaneous mapping of filamentous actin flow and turnover in migrating cells by quantitative fluorescent speckle microscopy. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Actin-Based Cell Motility and Cell Locomotion , 1996, Cell.

[19]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion , 2009, Nature.

[20]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. I. Movements of the leading edge. , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[21]  K. Hahn,et al.  Designing biosensors for Rho family proteins — deciphering the dynamics of Rho family GTPase activation in living cells , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  Timothy J Mitchison,et al.  Dissecting Temporal and Spatial Control of Cytokinesis with a Myosin II Inhibitor , 2003, Science.

[23]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[24]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[25]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Lamellipodial Actin Mechanically Links Myosin Activity with Adhesion-Site Formation , 2007, Cell.

[26]  C. Waterman-Storer,et al.  Spatiotemporal Feedback between Actomyosin and Focal-Adhesion Systems Optimizes Rapid Cell Migration , 2006, Cell.

[27]  Jake M. Hofman,et al.  Nonmuscle myosin IIA-dependent force inhibits cell spreading and drives F-actin flow. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Gary G. Borisy,et al.  Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm , 1999, Current Biology.

[29]  C. Waterman-Storer,et al.  Dual-wavelength fluorescent speckle microscopy reveals coupling of microtubule and actin movements in migrating cells , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  G. Danuser,et al.  Regional variation of microtubule flux reveals microtubule organization in the metaphase meiotic spindle , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  Shu Chien,et al.  Effects of cell tension on the small GTPase Rac , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  J. Heath,et al.  Cell to substratum contacts of chick fibroblasts and their relation to the microfilament system. A correlated interference-reflexion and high-voltage electron-microscope study. , 1978, Journal of cell science.

[34]  Tom Shemesh,et al.  Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: a physical mechanism. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Keith Burridge,et al.  Rho Kinase Differentially Regulates Phosphorylation of Nonmuscle Myosin II Isoforms A and B during Cell Rounding and Migration* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  C. Waterman-Storer,et al.  Converging Populations of F-Actin Promote Breakage of Associated Microtubules to Spatially Regulate Microtubule Turnover in Migrating Cells , 2002, Current Biology.

[38]  W. T. Chen.  Mechanism of retraction of the trailing edge during fibroblast movement , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  I M Gelfand,et al.  Rho-dependent formation of epithelial “leader” cells during wound healing , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.

[41]  Pekka Lappalainen,et al.  Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[42]  S. J. Smith,et al.  Actions of cytochalasins on the organization of actin filaments and microtubules in a neuronal growth cone , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  A. Ridley,et al.  The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling , 1992, Cell.

[44]  Timothy J. Mitchison,et al.  Identification of Novel Graded Polarity Actin Filament Bundles in Locomoting Heart Fibroblasts: Implications for the Generation of Motile Force , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  John G. Collard,et al.  Rac regulates phosphorylation of the myosin-II heavy chain, actinomyosin disassembly and cell spreading , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[46]  Y. Wang,et al.  Exchange of actin subunits at the leading edge of living fibroblasts: possible role of treadmilling , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[48]  D. Taylor,et al.  Gradients in the concentration and assembly of myosin II in living fibroblasts during locomotion and fiber transport. , 1993, Molecular biology of the cell.

[49]  Rizwan U. Farooqui,et al.  Multiple rows of cells behind an epithelial wound edge extend cryptic lamellipodia to collectively drive cell-sheet movement , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[50]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[51]  K. Rottner,et al.  Interplay between Rac and Rho in the control of substrate contact dynamics , 1999, Current Biology.

[52]  G. Danuser,et al.  Two Distinct Actin Networks Drive the Protrusion of Migrating Cells , 2004, Science.

[53]  E. Schaefer,et al.  Paxillin phosphorylation at Ser273 localizes a GIT1–PIX–PAK complex and regulates adhesion and protrusion dynamics , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[54]  N. K. Wessells,et al.  MICROFILAMENTS AND CELL LOCOMOTION , 1971, The Journal of cell biology.

[55]  T. Svitkina,et al.  Myosin II filament assemblies in the active lamella of fibroblasts: their morphogenesis and role in the formation of actin filament bundles , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[56]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. II. "RRuffling". , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[57]  G. Danuser,et al.  Morphodynamic profiling of protrusion phenotypes. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[58]  Thomas D Pollard,et al.  Regulation of actin filament assembly by Arp2/3 complex and formins. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[59]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Periodic Lamellipodial Contractions Correlate with Rearward Actin Waves , 2004, Cell.

[60]  G Danuser,et al.  Periodic patterns of actin turnover in lamellipodia and lamellae of migrating epithelial cells analyzed by quantitative Fluorescent Speckle Microscopy. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[61]  N. Balaban,et al.  Calculation of forces at focal adhesions from elastic substrate data: the effect of localized force and the need for regularization. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[62]  Live cell imaging of F-actin dynamics via Fluorescent Speckle Microscopy (FSM). , 2009, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.