An Introduction to Active Shape Models

Biomedical images usually contain complex objects, which will vary in appearance significantly from one image to another. Attempting to measure or detect the presence of particular structures in such images can be a daunting task. The inherent variability will thwart naive schemes. However, by using models which can cope with the variability it is possible to successfully analyse complex images. Here we will consider a number of methods where the model represents the expected shape and local grey-level structure of a target object in an image. Model-based methods make use of a prior model of what is expected in the image, and typically attempt to find the best match of the model to the data in a new image. Having matched the model, one can then make measurements or test whether the target is actually present. This approach is a ‘top-down’ strategy, and differs significantly from ‘bottomup’ methods. In the latter the image data is examined at a low level, looking for local structures such as edges or regions, which are assembled into groups in an attempt to identify objects of interest. Without a global model of what to expect, this approach is difficult and prone to failure. A wide variety of model based approaches have been explored (see the review below). This chapter will concentrate on a statistical approach, in which a model is built from analysing the appearance of a set of labelled examples. Where structures vary in shape or texture, it is possible to learn what are plausible variations and what are not. A new image can be interpreted by finding the best plausible match of the model to the image data. The advantages of such a method are that

[1]  Lawrence Sirovich,et al.  Application of the Karhunen-Loeve Procedure for the Characterization of Human Faces , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A Generic System for Image Interpretation Using Flexible Templates , 1992, BMVC.

[3]  Kanti V. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Models in Image Analysis , 1992 .

[4]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Automatic Interpretation and Coding of Face Images Using Flexible Models , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  C J Taylor,et al.  Medical image interpretation: a generic approach using deformable templates. , 1994, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[6]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models and the Shape Approximation Problem , 1995, BMVC.

[7]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  REPRESENTATIONS OF KNOWLEDGE IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[8]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A mixture model for representing shape variation , 1999, Image Vis. Comput..

[9]  Stuart Solloway,et al.  Quantification of Articular Cartilage from MR Images Using Active Shape Models , 1996, ECCV.

[10]  R. Fildes Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B): Gary K. Grunwald, Adrian E. Raftery and Peter Guttorp, 1993, “Time series of continuous proportions”, 55, 103–116.☆ , 1993 .

[11]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[12]  P. J. Burt,et al.  The Pyramid as a Structure for Efficient Computation , 1984 .

[13]  C. Goodall Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .

[14]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Learning to identify and track faces in image sequences , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[15]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A Probabilistic Fitness Measure for Deformable Template Models , 1994, BMVC.

[16]  Kanti V. Mardia,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Shape , 1998 .

[17]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Boundary Finding with Parametrically Deformable Models , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Edition , 1992 .

[19]  David C. Hogg,et al.  Learning Flexible Models from Image Sequences , 1994, ECCV.

[20]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[21]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[23]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Appearance Models , 1998, ECCV.