Surrogate modeling and failure surface visualization for efficient seismic vulnerability assessment of highway bridges

Abstract Seismic response and vulnerability assessment of key infrastructure elements, such as highway bridges, often requires a large number of nonlinear dynamic analyses of complex finite element models to cover the predictor parameter space. The substantial computation time may be reduced by using statistical learning techniques to develop surrogate models, or metamodels, which efficiently approximate the complex and implicit relationship between predictor variables, such as bridge design and ground motion intensity parameters, and the predicted bridge component seismic responses (e.g., column and bearing deformations). Addressing the existing disadvantages of unidimensional metamodels and lack of systematic exploration of different metamodeling strategies to predict bridge responses, this study analyzes four different metamodels, namely, polynomial response surface models as a reference to classical surrogate models, along with emerging multivariate adaptive regression splines, radial basis function networks, and support vector machines. These metamodels are used to develop multi-dimensional seismic demand models for critical components of a multi-span simply supported concrete girder bridge class. The predictive capabilities of the metamodels are assessed by comparing cross-validated goodness-of-fit estimates, and benchmark Monte Carlo simulations. Failure surfaces of bridges under seismic loads are explored for the first time to reveal low curvature the multi-dimensional limit state function and confirm the applicability of metamodels. Lastly, logistic regression is employed to develop parameterized fragility models which offer several advantages over “classical” unidimensional fragility curves. The results and methodologies presented in this study can be applied to efficiently estimate bridge-specific failure probabilities during seismic events.

[1]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[2]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[3]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Modelling considerations in probabilistic performance‐based seismic evaluation: case study of the I‐880 viaduct , 2006 .

[4]  G. Box,et al.  On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .

[5]  Jens Gottlieb,et al.  Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization , 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  A review on design, modeling and applications of computer experiments , 2006 .

[7]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Seismic Reliability Assessment of Aging Highway Bridge Networks with Field Instrumentation Data and Correlated Failures, I: Methodology , 2014 .

[8]  Jamie E. Padgett,et al.  Impact of multiple component deterioration and exposure conditions on seismic vulnerability of concrete bridges , 2012 .

[9]  Saeed Gholizadeh,et al.  Optimal Design of Structures for Earthquake Loading by Self Organizing Radial Basis Function Neural Networks , 2010 .

[10]  T. Simpson,et al.  Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria , 2001 .

[11]  EvoCOP,et al.  Evolutionary computation in combinatorial optimization : 11th European conference, EvoCOP 2011, Torino, Italy, April 27-29, 2011 : proceedings , 2011 .

[12]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates , 2001 .

[13]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[14]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[15]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[16]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Uniform Hazard Ground Motions for Mid-America Cities , 2001 .

[17]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Use of response surface metamodels for damage identification of a simple nonlinear system. , 2003 .

[18]  R. L. Hardy Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces , 1971 .

[19]  D. Dey,et al.  A First Course in Linear Model Theory , 2001 .

[20]  Sumeet Dua,et al.  Data Mining for Bioinformatics , 2012 .

[21]  Barry J. Goodno,et al.  Metamodel-based regional vulnerability estimate of irregular steel moment-frame structures subjected to earthquake events , 2012 .

[22]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Dimensionality reduction and visualization of structural reliability problems using polar features , 2012 .

[23]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures , 1999 .

[24]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings , 2009 .

[25]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Analytical Seismic Fragility Curves for Typical Bridges in the Central and Southeastern United States , 2007 .

[26]  Junwon Seo,et al.  Horizontally curved steel bridge seismic vulnerability assessment , 2012 .

[27]  J. Friedman Multivariate adaptive regression splines , 1990 .

[28]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Retrofitted Bridge Fragility Analysis for Typical Classes of Multispan Bridges , 2009 .

[29]  B. G. Nielson Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones , 2005 .

[30]  Jamie E. Padgett,et al.  Aging Considerations in the Development of Time-Dependent Seismic Fragility Curves , 2010 .

[31]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model for California Highway Bridges , 2001 .

[32]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .