A social life cycle assessment model for building construction in Hong Kong

PurposeSocial life cycle assessment (S-LCA) is a relatively new technique that is under rapid development. To further improve the reliability of S-LCA, more case studies and methodologies are of paramount importance. This study aims to develop a S-LCA model for building construction projects in Hong Kong, namely, the Social-impact Model of Construction (SMoC). In this paper, a social life cycle impact assessment (sLCIA) method is developed and a case study of a building construction project in Hong Kong is performed.MethodsThe development of SMoC is composed of three stages. Stage one strives to establish the sLCIA method which includes the characterization, normalization and weighting. In stage two, a questionnaire survey is conducted to collect the weighting factors and to unveil the social impacts of on-site construction practices. Based on that, the SMoC model which consists of a set of functional worksheets is built. In stage three, a case study following the four-phase structure of S-LCA suggested by the UNEP/SETAC guidelines is conducted.Results and discussionOf the selected subcategories, local experts believed that health and safety (worker) is the most important social aspect. The questionnaire survey also suggests that the environmental-friendly on-site construction activities as identified in this research are beneficial to the society in general. However, adoption of precast concrete components can lead to negative impacts on fair salary and local employment, since the precast concrete is normally produced outside Hong Kong. The case study demonstrates that the studied project has positive social impacts in general, while the construction stage performs better than the material stage. The sensitivity analysis indicates that inclusion of environmental-friendly construction practices can significantly improve the social performance of the studied building construction project.ConclusionsThe developed SMoC model and the case study should provide a comprehensive framework of S-LCA for building construction in Hong Kong. Despite being the first attempt of S-LCA in Hong Kong, the results help inform the local industry the social performance of their construction projects from a life cycle perspective.

[1]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Addressing the effect of social life cycle assessments , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[2]  Kaija Leena Saarela,et al.  Global estimates of occupational accidents , 2006 .

[3]  Rajendra Kumar Foolmaun,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Roberto Merli,et al.  Social Life Cycle Assessment as a Management Tool: Methodology for Application in Tourism , 2013 .

[5]  Jessica E. Leahy,et al.  Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[6]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Comparing the midpoint and endpoint approaches based on ReCiPe—a study of commercial buildings in Hong Kong , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  Stefan Salhofer,et al.  Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  Saeed Mansour,et al.  Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[11]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[12]  S. Mathé,et al.  Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[13]  Pauline Feschet,et al.  Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  Carmela Cucuzzella,et al.  Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes , 2010 .

[15]  A. Flysjö,et al.  Socioeconomic indicators as a complement to life cycle assessment—an application to salmon production systems , 2008 .

[16]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment , 2014, Science.

[17]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Social Life Cycle Inventory and Impact Assessment of Informal recycling of Electronic ICT Waste in Pakistan , 2013 .

[18]  E. Neumayer,et al.  Globalization and the Right to Free Association and Collective Bargaining: An Empirical Analysis , 2005 .

[19]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Methodologies for social life cycle assessment , 2008 .