Runoff generation and re-distribution in logged eucalyptus forests, south-eastern Australia

Abstract While pristine forests are traditionally regarded as environments with low runoff and low erosion potential, timber harvesting can dramatically affect surface runoff production, with some important consequences for in-stream water quality. A series of large-scale (300 m 2 ) rainfall simulator experiments on disturbed forest hillslopes, incorporating both snig track (skid trail) and general harvesting areas (GHA), examined runoff generation and redistribution during three sequential simulated storms on 13 sites. The simulated storms represented 30-min rainfall events with recurrence intervals of 2, 10, and 100 y respectively. The 13 sites were selected to represent dominant soil types and ages since disturbance. The snig tracks and GHA are characterised by significantly different soil hydraulic and vegetation properties as reflected in the nature and magnitude of runoff production. Infiltration-excess runoff dominated the snig track areas, while on recently disturbed GHA, runoff was distinctly patchy because of the high degree of spatial variability in saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K s ) and degrees of disturbance. Surface runoff from recently constructed snig tracks was an order of magnitude higher than the neighbouring GHA. Relative differences in runoff production between the two areas declined during extreme rainfall events. Infiltration tests also indicated that a change in the processes and rates of runoff persists for at least 5 y after disturbance. The practice of redistributing concentrated snig track runoff at cross banks was most effective for small storms. However, during more extreme events, the volume of snig track runoff increased and flow velocities and transport distances increased as the hillslope became increasingly saturated. The varying ability of the GHA to generate runoff and absorb concentrated flow from the snig track is likely to be critical in predicting both the initial hydrologic response and the recovery of a small catchment from forest disturbance.

[1]  Pacific Northwest Forest,et al.  Does harvest in west slope Douglas-fir increase peak flow in small forest streams? , 1973 .

[2]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of rainfall‐runoff processes on a hillslope , 1980 .

[3]  D. L. Thomas,et al.  A Physically-Based Forest Hydrology Model I: Development and Sensitivity of Components , 1986 .

[4]  R. Sands,et al.  Compaction of forest soils. A review , 1980 .

[5]  R. Betson,et al.  What is watershed runoff , 1964 .

[6]  P. J. Ryan,et al.  IMPACT OF FOREST HARVESTING ON THE HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES OF SURFACE SOIL , 1996 .

[7]  M. Bonell,et al.  The development of overland flow in a tropical rainforest catchment , 1978 .

[8]  S. Riley.  Effect of clearing and roading operations on the permeability of forest soils, Karuah catchment, New South Wales, Australia , 1984 .

[9]  B. Dickerson.  Soil Compaction After Tree-Length Skidding in Northern Mississippi1 , 1976 .

[10]  Steven D. Warren,et al.  Tracked Vehicle Traffic Effects on the Hydrologic Characteristics of Central Texas Rangeland. , 1993 .

[11]  R. M. Rice,et al.  Logging effects on streamflow: Storm runoff at Caspar Creek in northwestern California , 1990 .

[12]  Keith Loague,et al.  R‐5 revisited: 1. Spatial variability of infiltration on a small rangeland catchment , 1990 .

[13]  R. Dennis Harr,et al.  Changes in storm hydrographs after road building and clear‐cutting in the Oregon Coast Range , 1975 .

[14]  R. Freeze.  A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of one‐dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media , 1975 .

[15]  B. Bridge,et al.  A portable microcomputer-controlled drip infiltrometer. II: Field measurement of sorptivity, hydraulic conductivity and time to ponding , 1985 .

[16]  R. Z. Whipkey.  SUBSURFACE STORMFLOW FROM FORESTED SLOPES , 1965 .

[17]  T. Dunne,et al.  Sediment Production From Forest Road Surfaces , 1984 .

[18]  Robert L. Beschta,et al.  Logging, infiltration capacity, and surface erodibility in Western Oregon. , 1980 .

[19]  R. D. Black,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Runoff Production in Permeable Soils , 1970 .

[20]  B. F. Jackobsen.  Persistence of compaction effects in a forest kraznozem , 1983 .

[21]  Peter Wallbrink,et al.  Preferential Flow and Hydraulic Conductivity of Forest Soils , 1986 .

[22]  R. Ziemer.  Storm flow response to road building and partial cutting in small streams of northern California , 1981 .

[23]  Charles H. Luce,et al.  Parameter identification for a runoff model for forest roads , 1994 .

[24]  Hydrologic effects of a stretch of forest road , 1985 .

[25]  M. Sharma,et al.  Spatial variability of infiltration in a watershed , 1980 .

[26]  G. Grant,et al.  Channel network extension by logging roads in two basins, western Cascades, Oregon , 1996 .

[27]  P. Fanning,et al.  Vegetation banding in arid Western Australia , 1987, Journal of Arid Environments.

[28]  R. Isbell.  Australian Soil Classification , 1996 .

[29]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties , 1973 .

[30]  R. Harr,et al.  Streamflow changes after logging 130‐year‐old Douglas fir in two small watersheds , 1982 .

[31]  M. Bonell.  Progress in the understanding of runoff generation dynamics in forests , 1993 .

[32]  M. Bonell,et al.  The generation and redistribution of overland flow on a massive oxic soil in a eucalypt woodland within the semi-arid tropics of north Australia , 1986 .

[33]  T. Giambelluca,et al.  Importance of rural roads as source areas for runoff in mountainous areas of northern Thailand , 1997 .

[34]  J. Brouwer,et al.  The role of surface water redistribution in an area of patterned vegetation in a semi-arid environment, south-west Niger. , 1997 .

[35]  B. F. Jakobsen,et al.  Compaction of sandy forest soils by forwarder operations , 1985 .

[36]  T. Talsma,et al.  Hydraulic conductivity measurement of forest catchments , 1980 .

[37]  Keith Loague.  R‐5 revisited: 2. Reevaluation of a quasi‐physically based rainfall‐runoff model with supplemental information , 1990 .

[38]  L. A. Bruijnzeel,et al.  Impact of mechanized selective logging of rainforest on topsoil infiltrability in the Upper Segama area, Sabah, Malaysia , 1993 .

[39]  S. Willatt,et al.  Changes in the physical properties of a forest soil following logging , 1987 .

[40]  T. Dunne,et al.  Effects of Rainfall, Vegetation, and Microtopography on Infiltration and Runoff , 1991 .

[41]  E. Steinbrenner,et al.  The Effect of Tractor Logging on Physical Properties of Some Forest Soils in Southwestern Washington1 , 1955 .