Bus Arrival Time Modeling Based on Auckland Data

Inaccurate bus arrival time predictions are counterproductive to changing transport habits and promoting public transport use. This research sought to improve the bus passenger experience in terms of bus arrival time prediction by investigating various time series and regression-based techniques suitable for bus arrival time modeling. The models developed in the current study included: random walk with drift, multivariate linear regression, decision tree, artificial neural networks, and gene expression programming models. Historic automatic vehicle location and passenger flow data obtained for four bus routes spanning Auckland city, in both travel directions, were used as model inputs. Specifically, 10 independent variables were incorporated in the regression models, with distance between bus stops being the most significant predictor for bus travel time. Research results indicated that time series models outperformed regression techniques, with the time series artificial neural network being the most successful of the seven models developed. Moreover, the alternative models all performed significantly better than the prediction engine currently utilized by an Auckland bus company for arrival time prediction. However, these results require corroboration with manually collected field data, on account of the quality concerns afflicting the raw data reported by the transport company.

[1]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  A genetic algorithm-based method for improving quality of travel time prediction intervals , 2011 .

[2]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Simplifying decision trees , 1987, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Alejandro Tirachini,et al.  Median Busways versus Mixed-Traffic: Estimation of Bus Travel Time under Different Priority Conditions with Explicit Modelling of Delay at Traffic Signals , 2015 .

[4]  Swanirbhar Majumder,et al.  Gene Expression Programming , 2021, Research Anthology on Multi-Industry Uses of Genetic Programming and Algorithms.

[5]  Michael J Demetsky,et al.  SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC FLOW PREDICTION: NEURAL NETWORK APPROACH , 1994 .

[6]  Prakash Ranjitkar,et al.  Approximation and Short-Term Prediction of Bus Dwell Time using AVL Data , 2013 .

[7]  Steven I-Jy Chien,et al.  ESTIMATION OF BUS ARRIVAL TIMES USING APC DATA , 2004 .

[8]  Prakash Ranjitkar,et al.  BUS DWELL TIME MODELLING USING DECISION TREE BASED METHODS (Manuscript TRB number 14-3512) , 2014 .

[9]  Haitham Al-Deek,et al.  Travel-Time Prediction for Freeway Corridors , 1999 .

[10]  Lester A Hoel,et al.  Transportation Infrastructure Engineering: A Multimodal Integration , 2007 .

[11]  R. Lewis An Introduction to Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Analysis , 2000 .

[12]  Vencatachellum,et al.  Evaluation of stage 1 of Auckland's signal pre-emption and real time passenger information system , 2003 .

[13]  Sergio A. Lugo-Serrato,et al.  Transit Capacity and Quality-of-Service Manual: Applications to Mexican Transit Systems , 2008 .

[14]  Guoqiang Peter Zhang,et al.  Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[15]  S. Green How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[16]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  PREDICTION MODEL OF BUS ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE TIMES USING AVL AND APC DATA , 2004 .

[17]  Prakash Ranjitkar,et al.  Estimation of bus dwell time using univariate time series models , 2015 .

[18]  Lelitha Vanajakshi,et al.  Comparison of Model Based and Machine Learning Approaches for , 2014 .

[19]  Soroush Rashidi,et al.  Bus Dwell Time and Travel Time Modelling Using Data Mining Methods , 2014 .

[20]  Oded Cats,et al.  Real-time bus departure time predictions: Vehicle trajectory and countdown display analysis , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).