Solving Problems in Social–Ecological Systems: Definition, Practice and Barriers of Transdisciplinary Research

Translating policies about sustainable development as a social process and sustainability outcomes into the real world of social–ecological systems involves several challenges. Hence, research policies advocate improved innovative problem-solving capacity. One approach is transdisciplinary research that integrates research disciplines, as well as researchers and practitioners. Drawing upon 14 experiences of problem-solving, we used group modeling to map perceived barriers and bridges for researchers’ and practitioners’ joint knowledge production and learning towards transdisciplinary research. The analysis indicated that the transdisciplinary research process is influenced by (1) the amount of traditional disciplinary formal and informal control, (2) adaptation of project applications to fill the transdisciplinary research agenda, (3) stakeholder participation, and (4) functional team building/development based on self-reflection and experienced leadership. Focusing on implementation of green infrastructure policy as a common denominator for the delivery of ecosystem services and human well-being, we discuss how to diagnose social–ecological systems, and use knowledge production and collaborative learning as treatments.

[1]  Obert,et al.  SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY : LANDSCAPE APPROACH AS A PRACTICAL INTERPRETATION OF PRINCIPLES AND IMPLEMENTATION CONCEPTS , 2012 .

[2]  P. Angelstam,et al.  Cultural heritage connectivity. A tool for EIA in transportation infrastructure planning , 2010 .

[3]  Cecilia Waldenström,et al.  The Natural Resource Turn: Challenges for Rural Research and Policy , 2009 .

[4]  C. S. Holling.  Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management , 2005 .

[5]  J. Kuoppala,et al.  Rehabilitation and work ability: a systematic literature review. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  Kjell Andersson,et al.  Connecting Municipal and Regional Level Planning: Analysis and Visualization of Sustainability Indicators in Bergslagen, Sweden , 2013 .

[7]  J. Lynch.  It's not easy being interdisciplinary. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[8]  Panagiotis BALABANIS,et al.  Horizon 2020. , 2012, Nature materials.

[9]  E. Skärbäck.  Landscape planning to promote well being , 2007 .

[10]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Science.

[11]  E. Neumayer.  Weak Versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring The Limits Of Two Opposing Paradigms , 2010 .

[12]  P. Hutton,et al.  The natural resource. , 1990 .

[13]  P. Schantz,et al.  Contributions of Natural Environments to Physical Activity : Theory and Evidence Base , 2009 .

[14]  Robert Y. Cavana,et al.  Systems Thinking and Modelling: Understanding Change and Complexity , 2001 .

[15]  Carmen Mathijssen,et al.  Cees Leeuwis & Rhiannon Pyburn (eds.), Wheelbarrows full of Frogs. Social Learning in Rural Resource Management. , 2005 .

[16]  Robert Dyball,et al.  Social Learning in Environmental Management: Towards a Sustainable Future , 2005 .

[17]  Ü. Mander,et al.  Multifunctional land use: meeting future demands for landscape goods and services , 2007 .

[18]  P. Angelstam,et al.  Two-dimensional gap analysis: a tool for efficient conservation planning and biodiversity policy implementation. , 2003, Ambio.

[19]  A. Pullin,et al.  A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments , 2010, BMC public health.

[20]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Trans-disciplinary research in information systems , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[21]  P. Burridge.  Forests, trees and human health , 2012 .

[22]  Matilda Annerstedt.  Nature and public health - aspects of promotion, prevention, and intervention , 2012 .

[23]  A. Seiler,et al.  Integrating Ecological, Social and Cultural Dimensions in the Implementation of the Landscape Convention , 2013 .

[24]  M. Martuzzi.  The precautionary principle: in action for public health , 2007, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[25]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[26]  George Perkins Marsh,et al.  Man and Nature , 2002 .

[27]  P. Angelstam,et al.  Protecting Forest Areas for Biodiversity in Sweden 1991-2010 : the Policy Implementation Process and Outcomes on the Ground , 2011 .

[28]  B. Armstrong,et al.  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers , 2009, The Lancet.

[29]  Kristin Shrader-Frechette,et al.  Applied Ecology and the Logic of Case Studies , 1994, Philosophy of Science.

[30]  Anthony R. Beech,et al.  Theories of Risk , 2008 .

[31]  A. Bagheri,et al.  Navigating towards sustainable development: A system dynamics approach , 2006 .

[32]  Etiënne A. J. A. Rouwette,et al.  Group Model Building , 2020, System Dynamics.

[33]  S. Daniels,et al.  Working Through Environmental Conflict: The Collaborative Learning Approach , 2001 .

[34]  K. Öhman,et al.  Governing competing demands for forest resources in Sweden , 2011 .

[35]  Matilda Annerstedt.  Transdisciplinarity as an Inference Technique to Achieve a Better Understanding in the Health and Environmental Sciences , 2010, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[36]  R. Derwent,et al.  Late lessons from early warnings: the Precautionary Principle 1896–2000 , 2002 .

[37]  T. Hahn,et al.  Legal Framework for Biosphere Reserves as Learning Sites for Sustainable Development: A Comparative Analysis of Ukraine and Sweden , 2013, AMBIO.

[38]  Robert Axelsson,et al.  Integrative Research and Transdisciplinary Knowledge Production: A Review of Barriers and Bridges , 2010 .

[39]  E. Skärbäck.  Planning for healthful landscape values , 2007 .

[40]  Cecilia Waldenström,et al.  The Natural Resource Turn : Challenges for Rural Areas , 2009 .

[41]  I. Kruhlov,et al.  Measurement, Collaborative Learning and Research for Sustainable Use of Ecosystem Services: Landscape Concepts and Europe as Laboratory , 2013, AMBIO.

[42]  L. Svensson,et al.  Evaluation of Multi-level Social Learning for Sustainable Landscapes: Perspective of a Development Initiative in Bergslagen, Sweden , 2013, AMBIO.

[43]  P. Angelstam,et al.  Targets and tools for the maintenance of forest biodiversity , 2004 .

[44]  N. Birdsall.  Social development is economic development , 1993 .

[45]  C. Pohl,et al.  Handbook of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[46]  Paul Opdam,et al.  Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes , 2006 .

[47]  M. Villard,et al.  Setting conseravtion targets for managed forest landscapes , 2009 .

[48]  R. Howarth,et al.  The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations , 2011 .

[49]  H. Silvis.  The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policymaking , 2012 .

[50]  Hideaki Shiroyama,et al.  Sustainability Science: A Multidisciplinary Approach , 2012 .

[51]  Nam C. Nguyen,et al.  Creating ‘learning laboratories’ for sustainable development in biospheres: A systems thinking approach , 2011 .

[52]  Erik Skärbäck,et al.  Commentary: Landscape Planning to Promote Well Being: Studies and Examples from Sweden , 2007 .

[53]  Kjell Andersson,et al.  Social and Cultural Sustainability: Criteria, Indicators, Verifier Variables for Measurement and Maps for Visualization to Support Planning , 2013, AMBIO.

[54]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[55]  P. Angelstam,et al.  Knowledge Production and Learning for Sustainable Landscapes: Seven Steps Using Social–Ecological Systems as Laboratories , 2013, AMBIO.

[56]  O. Young.  On Environmental Governance: Sustainability, Efficiency, and Equity , 2012 .

[57]  Matthias Bergmann,et al.  Methods for Transdisciplinary Research: A Primer for Practice , 2013 .

[58]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[59]  Leona K. Svancara,et al.  Policy-driven versus Evidence-based Conservation: A Review of Political Targets and Biological Needs , 2005 .

[60]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. , 1996 .

[61]  L. Merabet,et al.  The plastic human brain cortex. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[62]  P. Währborg,et al.  Nature-assisted therapy: Systematic review of controlled and observational studies , 2011, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[63]  J Björk,et al.  Recreational values of the natural environment in relation to neighbourhood satisfaction, physical activity, obesity and wellbeing , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[64]  J. Os,et al.  The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010 , 2011, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[65]  M. Lamers,et al.  Beyond dry feet? Experiences from a participatory water-management planning case in The Netherlands. , 2010 .

[66]  H. Antonson,et al.  Road, forestry and regional planners' work for biodiversity conservation and public participation: a case study in Poland's hotspot regions , 2011 .

[67]  Gary Fry,et al.  Defining concepts and the process of knowledge production in integrative research , 2005 .

[68]  Etiënne A. J. A. Rouwette,et al.  Group Model Building , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[69]  R. Plowright,et al.  Causal inference in disease ecology: investigating ecological drivers of disease emergence , 2008 .

[70]  Donna B. Gilleskie,et al.  Nurse scientists overcoming challenges to lead transdisciplinary research teams. , 2014, Nursing outlook.

[71]  J. Klein.  Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[72]  A. Troy,et al.  Valuing ecosystem services , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[73]  Matthias Bergmann,et al.  Methods for Transdisciplinary Research , 2012 .

[74]  Giacomo Rambaldi,et al.  Participatory Spatial Information Management and Communication in Developing Countries , 2006, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[75]  A. Shvidenko.  Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis , 2005 .

[76]  Kjell Andersson,et al.  Protected Area as an Indicator of Ecological Sustainability? A Century of Development in Europe’s Boreal Forest , 2013, AMBIO.

[77]  J. Farman,et al.  Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000 , 2002 .

[78]  Mika Kautonen,et al.  Balancing Competitiveness and Cohesion in Regional Innovation Policy: The Case of Finland , 2012 .

[79]  Klaus Leidorf.  Environmental Governance, , 2007 .

[80]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Sustainability, efficiency and equity , 1991 .

[81]  Ulrika K. Stigsdotter,et al.  The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration , 2010 .

[82]  S. Brimelow.  Research strategy. , 1998, Nursing management.

[83]  E. Ostrom.  A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[84]  M. Alberti,et al.  Integrating Humans into Ecology: Opportunities and Challenges for Studying Urban Ecosystems , 2003 .

[85]  A. Kaźmierczak,et al.  Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review , 2007 .

[86]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science , 1992 .

[87]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  Series Editor: , 2007 .

[88]  J. Müller,et al.  Evidence-Based Knowledge Versus Negotiated Indicators for Assessment of Ecological Sustainability: The Swedish Forest Stewardship Council Standard as a Case Study , 2013, AMBIO.

[89]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[90]  P. Angelstam,et al.  Green infrastructures and intensive forestry: Need and opportunity for spatial planning in a Swedish rural–urban gradient , 2013 .

[91]  Gary Fry,et al.  From landscape research to landscape planning , 2006 .

[92]  Regeringen och Regeringskansliet.  En skogspolitik i takt med tiden , 2008 .

[93]  Peter J. Barnes.  Capitalism 3.0: A Guide to Reclaiming the Commons , 2006 .

[94]  Camilla Sandström,et al.  Multi-stakeholder collaboration in Russian and Swedish model forest initiatives: adaptive governance toward sustainable forest management? , 2010 .

[95]  Andreas Zetterberg,et al.  Network Based Tools and Indicators for Landscape Ecological Assessments, Planning, and Design , 2009 .

[96]  R. Norgaard.  Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder , 2010 .

[97]  Jens C. Pruessner,et al.  City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans , 2011, Nature.

[98]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[99]  K. Andersson.  Geographic Information Systems as a Tool to Support Monitoring and Assessment of Landscape and Regional Sustainability , 2011 .

[100]  G. Feola.  Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: A review of emerging concepts , 2015, Ambio.

[101]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .